Abstract
The spatial characterisation and vertical analysis are together considered important to evaluate structure of forested landscapes. In recent years, increased human impacts have resulted in changes in landscape and structure of the forest ecosystem. The present study is aimed to analyse impacts of disturbance on landscape structure using satellite remote sensing and a geographic information system (GIS) in Madhav National Park of India. The Landsat TM data have been used to identify vegetation types. The patch characteristics of the vegetation like size, shape, porosity and patch density have been studied. The physical and humanmade features have divided the national park in three zones. These zones are also utilised as management zones by the State Forest Department. The study indicates that the central zone is distinctly different from the south and north zones. The patch size and porosity have been found to be most important parameters to discriminate differences in the ecological status of three different zones of the park. The patchiness and shape provide supportive information and characterise the patches of the zones. The structural analysis of the vegetation revealed effect on species diversity and biomass distribution in the different disturbance regimes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beals, E. W. 1985. Bray-curtis ordination: An effective strategy for analysis of multivariate ecological data. Adv. Ecol. 14: 1-55.
Blair, R. M. & Brunett, L. E. 1976. Phytosociological changes after timber harvest in the southern in a southern pine ecosystem. Ecology 57: 18-32.
Cain, S. 1938. The species area curve. Am. Midl. Nat. 19: 573-581.
Champion, H. G. & Seth, S. K. 1968. Revised classification of forest types of India. Manager Publication, Government of India, Delhi Cole, G. A. 1983. Textbook of Limnology, 3rd ed. Mosby, St. Louis.
Curtis, J. T. & McIntosh, R. P. 1950. The interrelations of certain analytic and synthetic phytosociological characters. Ecology 31: 434-455.
Domoghue Daniel N. M. & Shenan, I. 1987. A preliminary assess-ment of Landsat TM imagery for mapping vegetation and sedi-ment distribution in Wash Estury. Int. J. Remote Sensing 8(7): 1101-1008.
Forman, T. T. R. & Godron, M. 1986. Landscape Ecology. John Wiley and Sons Publications, New York.
Grame, M. 1980. Best shape for nature reserves. Nature 286: 630-632.
Gordon, B. Bonnan 1991. Seasonal and annual carbon fluxes in a boreal forest landscape. J. Geophys. Res. 96(D9): 17 329-17 338.
Hack, B., Bryant, N. & Stevans, A. 1987. An assessment of Landsat MSS and TM data for urban landcooover digital classification. Remote Sensing Environ. 21: 201-213.
Hall, R. J., Dams R. V. & Lyseng, L. N. 1991. Forest cut cover map-ping from SPOT satellite data. Int. J. Remote Sensing 12(11): 2193-2204.
Hendrix, W. G., Fabos, J. Gy. & Price, J. E. 1988. An ecological approach to landscape planning using Geographic Infromation Technology. Landscape Urban Planning 15: 211-225.
Horn, H. S. 1968. The adaptive significance of colonial nesting in the Brewers Blacckbird (Euphogus Cyanocephalus). Ecology 49: 682-694.
Kershaw, K. A. 1975. Quantitative and Dynamic Plant Ecology. Elsevier, New York.
Lovejoy, S. 1982. Area perimeter, relation for rain and could areas. Science 16: 185-187.
Lynch, J. F. & Whigham, D. F. 1984. Effects of forest fragmentation on breeding bird communities in Maryland, USA. Biol. Conserv. 28: 287-324.
Marcot, B. G. & Meretsky, V. J. 1983. Shaping stands to enhance habitat diversity. J. For. 81: 527-528.
Margalef, F. R. 1958. Information theory in ecology. Gen. Syst. 3: 36-71.
Oliver, C. D. & Larson, B. C. 1990. Forest Stand Dynamics. Biolo-gical Resource Management Series. McGraw Hill, Inc.
Phillips, E. A. 1959. Methods of Vegetation Study. Henri Holt Co., Inc.
Pielou, E. C. 1966. The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections.J. Theor. Biol. 13: 131-144.
Prasad, S. N., Goyal, S. P., Roy, P. S. & Singh, S. 1994. Changes in wild ass (Equushemionus Khur) habitat conditions in Little Rann of Kutch, Gujrat from a remote sensing perspective. Int. J. Remote Sensing 15(16): 3155-3164.
Rodgers, W. A. & Panwar, S. H. 1988. Biogeographical classification of India. New Forest, Dehradun. 341 pp.
Roy, P. S., Saxena, K. G. & Pant, D. N. 1986. Analysis of vegetation types using satellite remote sensing techniques for wildlife hab-itat evaluation in Kanha National Park. Proc. of seminar-cum-workshop on wildlife habitat evaluation using remote sensing techniques. Eds. Kamat, D. S. & Panwar, H. S.
Roy, P. S., Ravan, S. A., Singh, I. J. & Singh S. 1993. Approach for terrestrial biomass estimation using satellite remote sensing. I. Monoculture plantation in Tarai region of Uttar Pradesh. Global Change Studies, Scientific report, ISRO-GPB-SR-42-92.
Shannon, C. E. & Weaver, W. 1963. The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
Simpson, E. H. 1949. Measurement of diversity. Nature 163: 688.
Slatkin, M. 1974. Competition and regional coexixtance. Ecology 55: 128-134.
Singh, K. P. 1968. Litter production and nutrient turnover in decidu-ous forest of Varanasi. Proc. Symp Recent Adv. Tropical Eco-logy. Eds. Misra, R. & Gopal, B.
Singh, K. P. & Misra, R. 1979. Structure and functioning of nat-ural modified, and silvicultural ecosystems of Eastern Uttar Pradesh. Final Technical Report (1975-1978). MAB research project Banaras Hindu University. 73 p.
Troll, C. 1971. Landscape Ecology (Geoecology) and Bio-ceonology-a terminology study. Geoforum 8: 43-46.
Vistousek, P. 1984. Litterfall, nutrient cycling and nutrient limita-tions in tropical forest. Ecology 65: 285-298.
Weins, J. A., Stenseth, N. C., Van Horne, B. & Ims, R. A. 1993.Ecological mechanisms and landscape ecology. Oikos 66: 369-380.
Whittaker, R. H. 1965. Branch dimensions and estimation of branch production. Ecology 46: 365-370.
William, D. L. & Nelson, R. F. 1986. Use of remotely sensed data for assessing forest stand conditions in eastern United States. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing E-24: 130-138.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ravan, S.A., Roy, P. Satellite remote sensing for ecological analysis of forested landscape. Plant Ecology 131, 129–141 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009731608350
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009731608350