Skip to main content
Log in

Differences in seedling growth characteristics among provenances of Aegilops speltoides Tausch

  • Published:
Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Differences in physiological characteristics were analysed among accessions/provenances of Aegilops speltoides and between these accessions and the Triticum aestivum cultivar Sparta. The seedlings were cultivated for 21 days in Hoagland 3 nutrient solution. At the end of the experiment, shoot and root dry matter was determined and total plant dry mass and shoot to root ratio were calculated. Daily measurements of the leaf length were used for the calculation of the leaf growth rate and phyllochron intervals. Finally, leaf area of individual leaf blades and the nitrogen content of the whole plant were determined. With few exceptions, no statistically significant differences among accessions of Ae. speltoides were found. Compared to these accessions, T. aestivum cv. Sparta produced considerably more dry matter. This was mainly due to larger leaf blade area, while net assimilation rates were similar. It was concluded that the variability among Aegilops provenances is of minor importance and any of the tested accessions could be used as a representative of Aegilops speltoides for further experiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Dvořák, J. & L. Nátr, L, 1971. Carbon dioxide compensation points of Triticum and Aegilops species. Photosynthetica 5: 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dvořák, J., P. di. Terlizi, H.B. Zhang & P. Resta, 1993. The evolution of polyploid wheats: identification of the A genome donor species. Genome 36: 21–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dvořák, J. & H.B. Zhang, 1990. Variation in repeated nucleotide sequences sheds light on the phylogeny of the wheat B and G genomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87: 9640–9644.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunstone, R.L., R.M. Gifford & L.T. Evans, 1973. Photosynthetic characteristics of modern and primitive wheat species in relation to ontogeny and adaptation to light. Austr. J. Biol. Sci. 26: 295–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J.R., 185. A comparison of the photosynthetic properties of flag leaves from Triticum aestivum and T. monococcum. In: Jeffcoat B., A.F. Hawkins & A.D. Stead (Eds), Regulation of Sources and Sinks in Crop Plants. Monograph 12. British Plant Growth Regulator Group. Bristol, pp. 111-125.

  • Evans, L.T. & R.L. Dunstone, 1970. Some physiological aspects of evolution in wheat. Austr. J. Biol. Sci. 23: 725–741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, K., 1980. Zur Taxonomie und Nomenklatur der Gattung Aegilops L. Feddes Repert. 91(4): 225–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook, G.P., A.J. Key & R.M. Leech, 1984. Biochemistry of photosynthesis in species of Triticum of differing ploidy. Plant Physiology 74: 12–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holubec, V., H. Havlíčková, R. Hanušová & E. Kostkanová, 1993. Evaluation of Aegilops collection for aphid infestation, rust and powdery mildew resistance and quality. In: A.B. Damania (Ed), Biodiversity and Wheat Improvement. ICARDA, J.Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 375–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, M.A. & S. Tsunoda, 1970. Evolutionary trends in leaf photosynthesis and related leaf characters among cultivated wheat species and its wild relatives. Jap. J. Breed. 20: 133–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambers, H., 1987. Does variation in photosynthetic rate explain variation in growth rate and yield? Netherlands J. Agric. Sci. 35: 505–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miglietta, F., 1989. Effect of photoperiod and temperature on leaf initiation rates in wheat (Triticum spp.). Field Crops Res. 21: 121–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, R. & E.R. Sears, 1967. The cytogenetics of wheat and its relatives. In: Quisenberry, K.S. & L.P. Reitz (eds), Wheat and wheat improvement, CSSA, Madison, pp. 19–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, C., T. Suzuki, K. Kasai, Y. Kubota, C. Yamagami & N. Mori, 1991. Cytoplasmic variability in wheat and its related species revealed by photosynthetic and respiratory characteristics. Proc. H. Kihara Memorial Int. Symp. on Cytoplasmic Engineering in Wheat. Yokohama, pp. 195–204.

  • Nátr, L., 1988. Shoot/root ratio during the early heterotophic growth of barley as influenced by mineral nutrition. Plant and Soil 111: 237–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nátr, L., 1997. The effect of nitrogen on dry matter allocation in young spring barley plants (Hordeum vulgare L.). Scientia Agric. Bohem. 28: 7–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, J.R., 1984. A model of canopy development in winter wheat. J. Agric. Sci. 102: 383–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slageren, M.W. van, 1994. Wild wheats: a monograph of Aegilops L. and Amblyopyrum (Jaub. et Spach) Eig (Poaceae). ICARDA and Wageningen Agric. University, 512 pp.

  • Tesařová, J. & L. Nátr, 1990. Phyllochron and winter barley leaf growth rate. Biol. Plantarum 32: 450–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uprety, D.C., M.C. Ghildiyal & G.S. Sirohi, 1987. Photosynthesis among cultivated and wild genotypes within ploidy levels in wheat. Ind. J. Agric. Sci. 57(8): 601–604.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

černohorská, J., Holubec, V., Zvára, K. et al. Differences in seedling growth characteristics among provenances of Aegilops speltoides Tausch. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 46, 119–125 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008697013728

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008697013728

Navigation