Skip to main content
Log in

Predatory Behavior in Dominant Arboreal Ant Species: The Case of Crematogaster sp. (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

  • Published:
Journal of Insect Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Crematogaster sp. is a dominant arboreal ant species that captures and retrieves very large prey. Hunting workers forage collectively thanks to short-range recruitment. They detect prey by contact, then rapidly attack, seizing small prey by the body and large prey by a leg. In this study, almost all the active prey were spread-eagled by several workers, even when small enough to permit a single worker to easily master them. While certain workers spread-eagled the prey, others deposited venom on the prey body using their spatulated sting (topical action of the venom). The well-developed arolia on the pretarsus of workers' legs have crucial importance for the success of prey capture (spread-eagling) and transport in an arboreal habitat. These results are compared with those known for other arboreal-dwelling generalist predator ant species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Adams, E. S. (1994). Territory defense by the ant Azteca trigona: Maintenance of an arboreal ant mosaic. Oecologia 97: 202-208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dejean, A. (1987). Effect of prey size on predatory behavior of Serrastruma serrula (Hymenoptera: Formicidae, Myrmicinae). Sociobiology 13: 295-306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dejean, A. (1990). Prey capture strategy of the african weaver ant. In Vander Meer, R. K., Jaffe, K., and Cedeno, A. (eds.), Applied Myrmecology, a World Pespective, Vol. 43, Westview Press, Boulder, pp. 472-481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dejean, A., and Corbara, B. (1998). Study of different foraging paths of the predatory Neotropical ponerine ant Pachycondyla (DNeoponera) villosa (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Sociobiology 32: 409-426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dejean, A., Lenoir, A., and Godzinska, E. J. (1994). The hunting behavior of Polyrhachis laboriosa, a non-dominant arboreal ant of the African equatorial forest (Hymenoptera: Formicidae, Formicinae). Sociobiology 23: 293-313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dejean, A., McKey, D., Gibernau, M., and Belin-Depoux, M. (2000). The arboreal ant mosaic in a Cameronian rainforest. Sociobiology 35: 403-423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federle,W., Rohrseitz, K., and Hölldobler, B. (2000). Attachment forces of ants measured with a centrifuge: Better “wax-runners” have a poorer attachment to a smooth surface.J. Exp. Biol. 203: 505-512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeland, J., Crozier, R. H., and Marc, J. (1982). On the occurrence of arolia in ant feet. J. Aust. Entomol. Soc. 21: 257-262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler, B., and Lumdsen, C. J. (1980). Territorial strategies in ants. Science 210: 732-739.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler, B., and Wilson, E. O. (1978). The multiple recruitment systems of the African weaver ant Oecophylla longinoda (Latreille) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 3: 19-60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler, B., and Wilson, E. O. (1990). The Ants, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenne, M., Schatz, B., Durand, J.-L., and Dejean, A. (2000). Hunting strategy of a generalist ant species proposed as a biological agent against termites. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 94: 31-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majer, J.D. (1993). Comparison of the arboreal ant mosaic in Ghana, Brasil, Papua New Guinea and Australia: Its structure and influence of ant diversity. In LaSalle, J., and Gauld, I. D. (eds.), Hymenoptera and Biodiversity, CAB International, Wallingford, pp. 115-141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orivel, J., and Dejean, A. (1999). L'adaptation `a la vie arboricole chez les fourmis. Ann. Biol. 38: 1-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orivel, J., Souchal, A., Cerdan, P., and Dejean, A. (2000). Prey capture behavior of the arboreal ponerine ant Pachycondyla goeldii (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 35: 131-140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, W. R. (1989). Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43: 223-225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatz, B., Lachaud, J. P., and Beugnon, G. (1997). Graded recruitment and hunting strategies linked to prey weight and size in the ponerine ant Ectatomma ruidum. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 40: 337-349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traniello, J. F. A. (1989). Foraging strategies of ants. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 34: 191-210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wojtusiak, J., Godzinska, E. J., and Dejean, A. (1995). Capture and retrieval of very large prey by workers of the African weaver ant, Oecophylla longinoda (Latreille 1802). Trop. Zool. 8: 309-318.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alain Dejean.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Richard, FJ., Fabre, A. & Dejean, A. Predatory Behavior in Dominant Arboreal Ant Species: The Case of Crematogaster sp. (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Journal of Insect Behavior 14, 271–282 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007845929801

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007845929801

Navigation