Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of pH and Dose on Nasal Absorption of Scopolamine Hydrobromide in Human Subjects

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Purpose. The present study was conducted to evaluate theeffects of formulation pH and dose on nasal absorption of scopolaminehydrobromide, the single most effective drug available for the prevention ofnausea and vomiting induced by motion sickness.

Methods. Human subjects received scopolamine nasally at adose of 0.2 mg/0.05 mL or 0.4 mg/0.10 mL, blood samples were collected atdifferent time points, and plasma scopolamine concentrations were determinedby LC-MS/MS.

Results. Following administration of a 0.2 mg dose, theaverage Cmax values were found to be 262 ± 118, 419± 161, and 488 ± 331 pg/mL for pH 4.0, 7.0, and 9.0formulations, respectively. At the 0.4 mg dose the average Cmaxvalues were found to be 503 ± 199, 933 ± 449, and 1,308± 473 pg/mL for pH 4.0, 7.0, and 9.0 formulations, respectively. At a0.2 mg dose, the AUC values were found to be 23,208 ± 6,824, 29,145± 9,225, and 25,721 ± 5,294 pg.min/mL for formulation pH 4.0,7.0, and 9.0, respectively. At a 0.4 mg dose, the average AUC value wasfound to be high for pH 9.0 formulation (70,740 ± 29,381 pg.min/mL)as compared to those of pH 4.0 (59,573 ± 13,700 pg.min/mL) and pH 7.0(55,298 ± 17,305 pg.min/mL) formulations. Both the Cmaxand AUC values were almost doubled with doubling the dose. On the otherhand, the average Tmax values decreased linearly with a decreasein formulation pH at both doses. For example, at a 0.4 mg dose, the averageTmax values were 26.7 ± 5.8, 15.0 ± 10.0, and 8.8± 2.5 minutes at formulation pH 4.0, 7.0, and 9.0, respectively.

Conclusions. Nasal absorption of scopolamine hydrobromidein human subjects increased substantially with increases in formulation pHand dose.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. American Hospital Formulatory Service (AHFS) 95 Drug Information. American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Inc., Bethesda, MD, 1995, pp. 801–804.

  2. A. Garybiel. Prevention and treatment of space sickness in shuttleorbiter missions. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 50:171–176 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. D. Wood and A. Garybiel. Evaluation of 16 anti-motion sickness drugs under controlled laboratory conditions. Aerospace Med. 39:131–134 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  4. H. I. Chinn, R. W. Hyde, and J. R. Milch. Prevention and treatment of motion sickness by intranasal medication. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 90:666–669 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  5. L. Putcha, N. M. Cintron, J. Tsui, J. M. Vanderploeg, and W. G. Kramer. Pharmacokinetics and oral bioavailability of scopolamine in normal subjects. Pharm. Res. 6:481–485 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  6. N. M. Cintron and Y. A. Chen. A sensitive radioreceptor assay for determining scopolamine concentrations in plasma. J. Pharm. Sci. 76:328–332 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Shaw and J. Urquhart. Programmed systemic delivery by the transdermal route. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2:208–211 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Y. W. Chien and S. F. Chang. Intranasal drug delivery for systematic medications. In S. D. Bruck (ed), Critical Reviews in Therapeutic Drug Career Systems, CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton FL, 1987, pp. 67–194.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Tonndorf, H. I. Chinn, and J. E. Lett. Absorption from nasal mucous membrane: Systemic effect of hyoscine following intranasal administration. Ann. Otol., Rhinol., Laryngol. 62:630–641 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. W. Hyde, J. Tonndorf, and H. E. Chinn. Absorption from the nasal mucous membrane. Ann. Otol., Rhinol., Laryngol. 62:957–968 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Gibaldi and D. Perrier. Pharmacokinetics, 2nd ed., Marcel Dekker, New York (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. Kagatani, N. Inaba, M. Fukui, and T. Sonobe. Nasal absorption kinetic behavior azetirelin and its enhancement by acylcarnitines in rats. Pharm. Res. 15:77–81 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  13. H. Nomura, S. Akamisaka, and K. Maruyama. Effects of dosing solution on the nasal absorption of non-glycosylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in rats. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 19:1490–1493 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  14. N. Shimoda, Y. Maitani, Y. Machida, and T. Nagai. Effects of dose, pH, and osmolarity on intranasal absorption of recombinant human erythropoetin in rats. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 18:734–739 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. A. Hussain, R. Bawarshi-Nasar, and C. H. Huang. Physicochemical considerations in intranasal drug administrations. In Y. W. Chien (ed), Transnasal Systemic Medications, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1985, pp. 121–137.

    Google Scholar 

  16. T. Ohwaki, H. Ando, S. Watanabe, and Y. Miyake. Effects of dose, pH, and osmolarity on nasal absorption of secretin. J. Pharm. Sci. 74:550–552 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. Hirai, T. Ikenaga, and T. Maatsuzawa. Nasal absorption of insulin in dogs. Diabates. 27:296–299 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ahmed, S., Sileno, A.P., deMeireles, J.C. et al. Effects of pH and Dose on Nasal Absorption of Scopolamine Hydrobromide in Human Subjects. Pharm Res 17, 974–977 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007551927177

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007551927177

Navigation