Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Prevention of nosocomial infection in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) through the use of selective digestive decontamination

  • Published:
European Journal of Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: To assess the effectiveness of selective digestive decontamination (SDD) on the control of nosocomial infection (NI) in critically ill pediatric patients. Design: A prospective, randomized, non-blinded and controlled clinical microbiology study. Setting: The pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) of a tertiary level pediatric university hospital. Criteria for inclusion: Patients 1 month to 14 years old, who underwent some kind of manipulation or instrumentation (mechanical ventilation, vascular cannulation, monitoring of intracranial pressure, thoracic or abdominal drainage, bladder catheterization, peritoneal dialysis, etc.) and/or presented a neurological coma requiring a stay in the PICU of 3 or more days. Patients: Over a period of 2 years, 244 patients met the inclusion criteria; 18 patients were withdrawn because of protocol violation. The treatment group comprised 116 patients and the control group, 110 patients. Intervention: The treatment group received a triple therapy of colimycin, tobramycin and nystatin administered orally or via nasogastric tube every 6 hours. All patients with mechanical ventilation or immune-depression received decontamination treatment of the oropharyngeal cavity with hexitidine (Oraldine® 0.5 mg/ml) every 6–8 hours in accordance with the PICU's conventional protocol. Method: Up to 10 types of nosocomial infection were diagnosed following criteria of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). The severity and manipulation of the patients on admission was assessed using the therapeutic intervention scoring system (TISS) and multi-organ system failure scores (MOSF). Measurements and main results. Univariant analysis: SDD did not significantly reduce the incidence of NI, antibiotic use, the length of stay, or mortality; although a small percentage of respiratory and urinary tract infections was detected, catheter-related bacteremia was the most common infection. Multivariant analysis: Controlling the risk factors for each child through log regression showed that SDD acted as a protective factor for more than 90% of the sample with respect to the appearance of respiratory and urinary tract infections, reducing the risk of such infections to 1/5 and 1/3, respectively. Conclusions: SDD was effective in controlling respiratory and urinary tract infections in children admitted to the PICU, but it did not reduce the incidence of other types of nosocomial infection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Welliver R, McLaughlin S. Unique epidemiology of nosocomial infection in a children's hospital. Am J Dis Child 1984; 138: 131–135.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Daschner F, Saal E. Nosocomial infections in a children's hospital. Results of a prospective study covering 3 1/2 years. Monatsschr Kinderheilkd 1981; 1129: 578–580.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Derter OP. Nosocomial infection in a children's hospital. A retrospective study. J Hyg Epidemiol Mierobiol Immunol 1986; 30: 149–153.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Klein BS, Perloff WH, Maki DG. Reduction of nosocomial infection during pediatric intensive care by protective isolation. N Engl J Med 1986; 320: 1714–1721.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Donowitz LG. High risk of nosocomial infection in the pediatric critical care patient. Crit Care Med 1986; 14: 26–28.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Milliken J, Tait GA, Ford-Jones E, et al. Nosocomial infections in a pediatric intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 1988; 16: 233–237.

    Google Scholar 

  7. EPIC Study Co-ordinator: Nosocomial infection in ICU in 1992. A European perspective. Intensive Care World 1992; 92: 24–25.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brown RB, Stechenberg B, Sandsm M, et al. Infections in a pediatric intensive care unit. Am J Dis Child 1987; 141: 267–270.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rodríguez P, Herruzo R, Alvarado F, et al. Estudio prospectivo de la infección hospitalaria en una unidad de cuidados intensivos pediátricos. An C Intensivos 1988; 3: 35–39.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wenzell RP. The evolving art and science of hospital epidemiology. J Infect Dis 1986; 153: 462–470.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Stoutenbeek CP, Van Saene HKF, Miranda DR, et al. The effect of selective decontamination of the digestive tract on colonization and infection rate in multiple trauma patients. Intensive Care Med 1984; 10: 185–192.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stoutenbeck CP, Van Saene HKF, Miranda DR, et al. The effect of oropharyngeal decontamination using topical nonabsorbable antibioties on the incidence of nosocomial respiratory tract infections in multiple trauma patients. J Trauma 1984; 27: 357–364.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Unerti K, Ruckdeschel G, Selbmann H, et al. Prevention of colonization and respiratory infections in longterm ventilated patient by local antimierobial prophylaxis. Intensive Care Med 1987; 13: 106–113.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Van Uffelen R, Rommes J, Van Saene H. Preventing lower airway colonization and infection in mechanically ventilated patients. Crit Care Med 1987; 15: 99–102.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wiesner R, Hermans P, Rakela J, et al. Selective bowel decontamination to prevent gram-negative bacterial and fungal infection following orthotopic liver transplantation. Transplant Proc 1987; 19: 2420–2423.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kerver A, Rommes J, Mevissen-Verhage E, et al. Prevention of colonization and infection in critically patients: A prospective randomized study. Crit Care Med 1988; 16: 1087–1093.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Aerdtz SJA, Van Dalen R, Clasener HAL, et al. Prophylaxis of infection by selective decontamination in mechanically ventilated patients. Drugs 1988; 35(S2): 97–99.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ledingham IM, Eastaway AT, McKay IC, et al. Triple regimen of selective decontamination of the digestive tract, systemic cefotaxime and microbiological surveillance for prevention of acquired infection in intensive care. Lancet 1988; i: 785–790.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zandstra DF, Stoutenbeek CP, Van Saene HK, et al. Selective decontamination of the digestive tract improves survival in patients receiving differential lung ventilation. Intensive Care Med 1988; 15: 15–18.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ulrich C, Harinck de Weerd JE, Bakker NC, et al. Selective decontamination of the digestive tract with norfloxacin in the prevention of ICU-acquired infections: A prospective randomized study. Intensive Care Med 1989; 15: 424–431.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mc Clenlland P, Murray A, Williams P, et al. Reducing sepsis in severe combined acute renal and respiratory failure by selective decontamination of the digestive tract. Crit Care Med 1990; 18: 935–939.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tetteroo G, Wagenvoort J, Castelein A, et al. Selective decontamination to reduce gram-negative colonization and infections after oesophageal resection. Lancet 1990; 335: 704–707.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Flaherty J, Nathan C, Kabins S, et al. Pilot trial of selective decontamination for prevention of bacterial infection in an intensive care unit. J Infect Dis 1990; 162: 1393–1397.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Godart J, Guillaume G, Reverdy ME, et al. Intestinal decontamination in a polyvalent ICU. A double blind study. Intensive Care Med 1990; 16: 1307–1311.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rodríguez Roldán J, Altuna Cuesta A, López A, et al. Prevention of nosocomial lung infection in ventilated patients: Use of an antimierobial pharyngeal nonabsorbable paste. Crit Care Med 1990; 18: 1239–1242.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sydow M, Burchardi H, Crozier TA, et al. Prospective study of infection and mortality rates in critically ill patients during DSD regimen. In: Van Saene HKF, Stoutenbeek CP, Lawin P, Ledingham I McA (eds), Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Brun-Buisson C, Legrand P, Rauss A, et al. Intestinal decontamination for control of nosocomial multiresistant gram-negative bacilli. Ann Intern Med 1989; 110: 873–880.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Aerdts SJ, Van Dalen R, Clasener HAL, et al. Prophylaxis of infection by selective decontamination in mechanically ventilated patients. A preliminary report. Drugs 1988; 35(S2): 97–99.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gastinne H, Wolff M, Delatour F, et al. A controlled trial in intensive care units of selective decontamination of the digestive tract with nonabsorbable antibioties. N Engl J Med 1992; 326: 594–599.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zobel G, Kuttnig M, Grubbauer HM, et al. Reduction of colonization and infection rate during pediatric intensive care by selective decontamination of the digestive tract. Crit Care Med 1991; 19: 1242–1246.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Aerdts SJ, Van Dalen RV, Clasener HAL, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis of respiratory tract infection in mechanically ventilated patients. A prospective, blinded, randomized trial of the effect of a novel regimen. Chest 1991; 100: 783–791.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hartenauer U, Thulig B, Diemer W, et al. Effect of selective flora suppression on colonization, infection, and mortality in eritically ill patients. A one-year, prospective consecutive study. Crit Care Med 1991; 19: 463–474.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hammond JM, Pottgieter PD, Saunders GL, et al. Double-blind study of selective decontamination of the digestive tract in intensive care. Lancet 1992; 340: 5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Selective Decontamination of the Digestive Tract Trialists Collaborative Group. Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of selective decontamination of the digestive tract. Br Med J 1993; 307: 525–532.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hammond JM, Potgieter PD, Saunders GL. Selective decontamination of the digestive tract in multiple trauma patients. Is there a role? Results of a prospective, double-blind, randomized trial. Crit Care Med 1994; 22: 33–39.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Bion JF, Badger L, Crosby HA, et al. Selective decontamination of the digestive tract reduces Gram-negative pulmonary colonization but not systemic endotoxemia in patients undergoing elective liver transplantation. Crit Care Med 1994; 22: 40–49.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Deitch EA, Maejima K, Berg R. Effect of oral antibiotics and bacterial overgrowth on the translocation of the GI tract microflora in burned rats. J Trauma 1985; 25: 385–392.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wells CL, Jechorek RP, Erlandsen SL. Evidence for the translocation of Enterococcus faecalis across the mouse intestinal tract. J Infect Dis 1990; 162: 82–90.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Redan JA, Rush BJ, McCullough JN, et al. Organ distribution of radiolabeled enteric Escherichia coli during and after hemorrhagic shock. Ann Surg 1990; 211: 663–668.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Keene AR, Cullen DJ. Therapeutic intervention scoring system: Update 1983. Crit Care Med 1983; 11: 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wilkinson JD, Pollack MM, Ruttimann UE, et al. Outcome of pediatrie patients with multiple organ system failure. Crit Care Med 1986; 14: 271–274.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Garner JS, Jarvis WR, Emori TG, et al. CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988. Am J Infect Control 1988; 16: 128–140.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Schaberg DR, Culver DH, Gaynes RP. Major trends in the mierobial aetiology of nosocomial infection. Am J Med 1991; 91(S3B): 72–75.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Gómez EC, Markowsky SJ, Rotschafer JC. Selective decontamination of the digestive tract in intensive care patients: review and commentary. Ann Pharmacother 1992; 26: 963–975.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Fink MP. Selective digestive decontamination: A gut issue for the nineties. Crit Care Med 1992; 20: 559–562.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Deitch EA. Selective decontamination of the gut. Is it enough? Crit Care Med 1990; 18: 1043–1044.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Servicio de Cuidados Intensivos Pediátricos Hospital Infantíl La Paz, Spain

    Francisco Ruza, Francisco Alvarado, Miguel A. Delgado, Santos García, Paloma Dorao & Federico Goded

  2. Catedra de Medicina Preventiva y Salud Publica de la Universidad Autónomica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain

    Rafael Herruzo

Authors
  1. Francisco Ruza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Francisco Alvarado
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rafael Herruzo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Miguel A. Delgado
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Santos García
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Paloma Dorao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Federico Goded
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ruza, F., Alvarado, F., Herruzo, R. et al. Prevention of nosocomial infection in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) through the use of selective digestive decontamination. Eur J Epidemiol 14, 719–727 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007487330893

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007487330893

Search

Navigation