Abstract
Non-destructive methods for determining the biomass and leaf area of individual trees throughout their growing cycle are an essential tool in agroforestry research, but must be capable of providing reliable estimates despite the influence that management strategies such as pruning may have on tree form. In the present study, allometric methods involving measurements of the diameter of all branches provided reliable estimates of canopy leaf area and biomass for grevillea trees (Grevillea robusta A. Cunn.; Proteaceae) grown as poles, but proved unsuitable for routine measurements because of their time-consuming nature. An alternative, less laborious method based on measurements of trunk cross-sectional area immediately below the first branch of the canopy provided satisfactory allometric estimates of leaf area and canopy biomass. Trunk biomass was determined from measurements of tree height and diameter at breast height using established methodology based on the assumption that trunk volume may be calculated using a quadratic paraboloid model; biomass was determined as the product of trunk volume and the specific gravity of the wood. The theoretical basis, development and validation of allometric methods for estimating tree growth are discussed and their wider applicability to other agroforestry systems is assessed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boland DJ, Brooker MIH, Chippendale GM, Hall N, Hyland BPM, Johnston RD, Kleinig DA and Turner JD (1984) Forest Trees of Australia. Nelson. CSIRO, Melbourne, 687 pp
Cannell MGR (1984) Woody biomass of forest stands. For Ecol Manage 8: 299–312
Chapman JW and Gower ST (1991) Aboveground production and canopy dynamics in sugar maple and red oak trees in South Western Wisconsin. Can J For Res 21: 1533–1543
Farnsworth KD and Vangardingen PR (1995) Allometric analysis of sitka spruce branches – mechanical versus hydraulic design principles. Trees – Structure and Function 10: 1–12g
Fownes JH and Harrington RA (1990) Modeling growth and optimal rotations of tropical multipurpose trees using unit leaf rate and leaf-area index. J Appl Ecol 27: 886–896
Friend AD, Stevens AK, Knox RG and Cannell MGR (1997) A process-based, terrestrial biosphere model of ecosystem dynamics (Hybrid v3.0). Ecol Model 95: 249–287
Harrington RA and Fownes JH (1995) Predicting spacing effects on the growth and optimal rotations of tropical multipurpose trees. Agric Syst 50: 377–390
Howard SB (1997) Resource Capture and Productivity of Agroforestry Systems in Kenya. PhD Thesis, University of Nottingham, UK
Jaenicke H (1991) Development of Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Wit under salinity stress. An agroecological study with regard to nitrogen metabolism. PhD Thesis, Technische Universitäet, Darmstadt, Germany
Kalinganire A and Hall JB (1993) Growth and biomass production of young Grevillea robusta provenances in Rwanda. For Ecol Manage 62: 73–84
King DA (1996) Allometry and life-history of tropical trees. Trop Ecol 12: 25–44
Langstrom B and Hellqvist C (1991) Effects of different pruning regimes on growth and sapwood area of Scots pine. For Ecol Manage 44: 239–254
Lott JE (1998) Resource Capture and Use in Semi-arid Overstorey Agroforestry Systems. PhD Thesis, University of Nottingham, UK
Lott JE, Howard SB, Ong CK and Black CR (2000a) Long term productivity of a Grevillea robusta-based agroforesty system in semi-arid Kenya I Tree growth. For Ecol Man (in press)
Lott JE, Howard SB, Ong CK and Black CR (2000b) Long term productivity of a Grevillea robusta-based agroforesty system in semi-arid Kenya II Crop growth and system productivity. For Ecol Man (in press)
Margolis HA, Gagnon RR, Pothier D and Pineau M (1988) The adjustment of growth, sapwood area, heartwood area, and sapwood saturated permeability of balsam fir after different intensities of pruning. Can J For Res 18: 723–727
Mencuccini M and Grace J (1995) Climate influences the leaf-area sapwood area ratio in Scots pine. Tree Physiol 15: 1–10
Natarajan K, Paliwal K and Gnanam A (1988) Biomass and leaf area relationships in Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Wit. Photosynthetica 22: 105–107
Nikinmaa E (1993) Analyses of the growth of Scots Pine: matching structure with function. Acta For Fenn 235: 1–68
Nygren P, Rebottaro S and Chavarria R (1993) Application of the pipe model-theory to nondestructive estimation of leaf biomass and leaf area of pruned agroforestry trees. Agrofor Syst 23: 63–77
O'Brien ST, Hubbell SP, Spiro P, Condit R and Foster RB (1995) Diameter, height, crown, and age relationships in 8 neotropical tree species. Ecol 76: 1926–1939
Ong CK, Khan AAH, Black CR, Lott JE, Howard SB, Wallace JS, Jackson NA and Smith DM (2000) Productivity, microclimate and water use in Grevillea robusta-based agroforestry systems on hillslopes in semi-arid Kenya. Agric Ecosys Env (in press)
Penner M and Deblonde G (1996) The relationship between leaf-area and basal area growth in jack and red pine trees. For Chron 72: 170–175
Rennolls K (1994) Pipe-model theory of stem-profile development. For Ecol Manage 69: 41–55
Shinozaki K, Yoda K, Hozumi K and Kira T (1964) A quantitative analysis of plant form: The pipe model theory. II. Further evidence of the theory and its application in forest ecology. Jpn J Ecol 14: 133–139
Valentine HT (1985) Tree-growth models-derivations employing the pipe-model theory. Theor Biol 117: 579–585
Waring RH, Schroeder PE and Oren R (1982) Application of the pipe model-theory to predict canopy leaf area. Can J For Res 12: 556–560
Whittaker RH and Marks PL (1975) Methods of assessing terrestrial productivity. In: Leith H and Whittaker RH(eds) Primary Production in the Biosphere, pp 105–118. Springer-Verlag, New York
Woods KD, Feiveson AH and Botkin DB (1991) Statistical error analysis for biomass density and leaf area index estimation. Can J For Res 21: 974–989
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lott, J., Howard, S., Black, C. et al. Allometric estimation of above-ground biomass and leaf area in managed Grevillea robusta agroforestry systems. Agroforestry Systems 49, 1–15 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006330830109
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006330830109