Abstract
Agroforestry systems usually are examined for their biological components and somewhat for economic feasibility but rarely for their sociocultural merits. A relatively young agroforestry system was examined in view of sociocultural, biological, and economic factors through the use of decision matrices. Decision criteria were used to evaluate an agroforestry system against two alternative landuse options, a corn-soybean rotation and renting the land to an agricultural producer. Economic, sociocultural, environmental, and risk criteria were considered simultaneously with a scaled Z-statistic and then compared by using four weighting schemes. When all criteria were weighted equally, the agroforestry system had the greatest Z-score (3.4), indicating the better alternative. Placing weights on economic criteria resulted with renting the land being the best alternative (Z-score 6.6). When sociocultural factors were weighted alone, or when greater weights were placed on sociocultural factors along with moderate weights on economic and risk factors, or when community weighted objectives were used, the introduced agroforestry system had the greatest Z-scores (11.5, 6.3, and 1.1, respectively). Use of weighted decision criteria allowed for sensitivity analysis between alternatives to be explored. This is especially important when using techniques that have a greater emphasis on economic parameters that are not equally important or appropriate cross-culturally. Use of decision matrices provides a more comprehensive method for comparing the multiple, interactive, and long-term benefits of the agroforestry system and competing land uses.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adamowicz W, Beckley T, MacDonald DH, Just L, Luckert M, Murray E and Phillips W (1994) In search of forest resource values of aboriginal peoples: the applicability of nonmarket valuation techniques. Rural Econ. Staff Paper 94-08. University of Alberta. Edmonton, Canada
Arnold JM (1983) Economic consideration in agroforestry projects. Agroforestry Syst 1: 299–311
Campbell GE and Lottes J (1989) The analysis of agroforestry in Illinois. Forestry Research Report No. 89-2, Agricultural Experiment Sta University Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Canham HO (1990) Decision matrices and weighting summation valuation in forest land planning. North J Appl For 7: 77–79
Messerschmidt DA (1991) Rapid rural appraisal for community forestry: the RA process and rapid diagnostic tools. Technical Paper No. TP 91/2. Institute of Forestry, Nepal
Nair PK (1993) An introduction to agroforestry. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
Price C (1995) Economic evaluation of financial and non-financial costs and benefits in agroforestry development and the value of sustainability. Agroforestry Syst 30: 75–86
Rule LC, Colletti JP, Faltonson RR, Rosacker J and Ausborn D (1995) Evaluating conversion of cropland. Jour of For Econ 1: 329–346
Scoones I and McCracken J (1989) Participatory rural appraisal in Wollo: peasant association planning for natural resource management. London: IIED
Sinden JA and Worrell AC (1979) Unpriced values. Wiley, New York
Smith DH (1994) The issue of compatibility between cultural integrity and economic development among Native American tribes. Amer Indian Cult Res J 18: 177–205
Swinkels R Franzel S and Shepherd K (1994) Economic analysis of on-farm improved fallows in Western Kenya. ICRAF training notes: May 1994. Nairobi, Kenya: ICRAF
Szymanski MB, Whitewing L and Colletti JP (1998) The use of participatory rural appraisal methodologies to link indigenous knowledge and landuse decisions among the Winnegago Tribe of Nebraska. Indigenous Knowledge Monitor 6(2): 3–6
United States Department of Interior (1977) Handbook for Habitat Evaluation Procedures. Fish and Wildlife Service. Pub. 132. Washington, DC
Van Kooten CG (1995) Can nonmarket values be used as indicators of forest sustainability? The For Chron 71: 702–711
Walker DH, Sinclair FL and Thapa B (1995) Incorporation of indigenous knowledge and perspectives in agroforestry development. Agroforestry Syst 30: 235–248
Winpenny JT (1991) Values for the environment: A guide to economic appraisal. Overseas Development Institute, London
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Szymanski, M., Colletti, J. Combining the socio-economic-cultural implications of community owned agroforestry: The Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska. Agroforestry Systems 44, 227–239 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006298627257
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006298627257