Skip to main content
Log in

Introduction of Relative Abundance Distribution (RAD) Indices, Estimated from the Rank-Frequency Diagrams (RFD), to Assess Changes in Community Diversity

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Quantifying a relative abundance distribution based on thesampling of a set of species is a widespread problem in ecology.A number of diversity indices have been proposed and used in numerous works in spite of a lack of statistical characteristics and tests of comparison. The relative abundancedistribution can also be described using rank-frequency diagrams but fitting these diagrams to mathematical models such as the Zipf-Mandelbrot model remains problematic. Strong correlation between the Zipf-Mandelbrot model parameters prevent their estimation by optimization algorithm. In light of this, new indices of sampled communities are introduced here. These indices are two linear regression slopes estimated from rank-frequency diagrams. The numerous statistical studies that have been carried out on linear regression models are used to compare sampled communities. These new indices possesscharacteristic properties with an ecological meaning.Correlations between these indices, the Zipf-Mandelbrot modelparameters and an evenness diversity index are examined. Anecological application is made using entomological data as anexample. This example consists of a transect from the edge of apond to a dry forest along which 60,000 insects were sampledfrom six different sampling stations. Using the new indicesdescribed here, station C, located at the edge of that areasubject to influence from the pond, is differentiated from theother stations. This station would seem to present the lowestdegree of niche diversity and the lowest evenness, and recent observations confirm the deterioration of this station.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altesor, A., Di Landro, E., May, H. and Ezcurra, E.: 1998, Long-term species change in a Uruguayan grassland, J. Veget. Sci. 9, 173-180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoki, I.: 1995, Diversity and rank-abundance relationship concerning biotic compartments, Ecol. Modelling 82, 21-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, P., Amanieu, M., Lam Hoi, T. and Lasserre, G.: 1998, Application du modéle de distribution d'abondance de Mandelbrot à l'estimation des captures dand l'étang de Thau, J. Cons. Int. Explo. Mer 44, 235-246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bersier, L. F. and Sugihara, G.: 1997, Species abundance pattern: the problem of testing stochastic models, J. Amin. Ecol. 66, 769-774.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burel, F., Baudry, J., Butet, A., Clergeau, P., Delettre, Y., Le Coeur, D., Dubs, D., Morvan, N., Paillat, G., Petit, S., Thenail, C., Brunel, E. and Lefeuvre, J.C.: 1998, Comparative biodiversity along a gradient of agricultural landscapes, Acta Oecol. 19(1), 47-60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camargo, J. A.: 1996, Spatiotemporal variations in species diversity to assess environmental impacts on aquatic communities: the use of biomass data versus density data, Environ. Monit. Assess. 34, 271-287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, N., Gason, A. S. H. and Poore, G. C. B.: 1997, High species richness in the shallow marine waters of south-east Australia, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 154, 17-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Draper, N. R. and Smith, H.: 1966, Applied Regression Analysis, Wiley and Sons, New York, 256 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, J. M.: 1977, Some methods for the statistical analysis of samples of benthic invertebrates, Scientific Publications of the Freshwater Biological Association, Ambleside, UK, 153 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, J. F.: 1988, Structural and functional diversity in temperate forests, in E. O. Wilson (ed.), Biodiversity, National Academy Press, Washington, pp. 166-175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromentin, J. M., Dauvin, J. C., Ibanez, F., Dewarumez, J. M. and Elkaim, B.: 1997, Long-term variations of four macrobenthic community structures, Oceanol. Acta 20(1), 43-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frontier, S.: 1976, Utilisation des diagrammes rang-fréquence dans l'analyse des écosystèmes, J. Rech. Ocean. 1, 35-48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frontier, S.: 1985, Diversity and structure in aquatic ecosystems, Mar. Biol. Ann. Rev. 23, 253-312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston, K. J.: 1994, Rarity, Chapman and Hall, London, 192 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston, K. J.: 1996, Biodiversity, Blackwell, Oxford, 395 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston, K. J. and Mound, L. A.: 1993, Taxonomy, hypothesis testing and the biodiversity crisis, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lon. B. 251, 139-142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gimaret-Carpentier, C., Pélissier, R., Pascal, J. P. and Houllier, F.: 1998, Sampling strategies for the assessment of tree species diversity, J. Veget. Sci. 9, 161-172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, R. G.: 1986, Theories and models of species abundance, Amer. Nat. 128, 879-899.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutcheson, K.: 1970, A test for comparing diversities based on the Shannon formula, J. Theor. Biol. 29, 151-154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kevan, P. G., Greco, C. F. and Belaoussoff, S.: 1997, Log-normality of biodiversity and abundance in diagnosis and measuring of ecosystemic health: pesticide stress on pollinators on blueberry heaths, J. Appl. Ecol. 34, 1122-1136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam Hoi, L., Amanieu, M. and Lasserre, G.: 1984, Notes sur l'ajustement du modèle de distribution d'abondances de Mandelbrot par la méthode des moindres carrés non linéaires, Acta Oecol. 5, 159-167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leps, J.: 1993, Taylor' power law and the measurement of variation of the size of populations in space in time, Oïkos 68, 349-356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig, J. A. and Reynolds, J. F.: 1988, Statistical Ecology. A Primer on Methods and Computing, Wiley, New-York, 337 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macchiato, M. F., Ragosta, M., Cosmi, C. and Lo Porto, A.: 1992, A method in multivariate statistics to analyze ecosystems starting from their species composition, Ecol. Modelling 62, 285-310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magurran, A. E.: 1988, Ecological Diversity and its Measurements, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 179 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot, B.: 1977, Fractals, Form, Chance and Dimension, Freeman and Co, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot, B.: 1982, The Fractal Geometry of Nature, Freeman and Co, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • McArthur, R. H.: 1957, On the relative abundance of species, Proceedings of the National Academy og Sciences of the USA 43, 283-295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. C.: 1993, Insect natural history, multi-species interactions and biodiversity in ecosystems, Biodiv. Conserv. 2, 233-241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motomura, I.: 1947, Further notes on the law of geometrical progression of the population density in animal association, Physiol. Ecol. 1, 55-60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naeem, S. and Hawkins, B. A.: 1994, Minimal community structure: How parasitoids divide resources, Ecology 75(1), 79-85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss, R. F.: 1990, Indicators for Monitoring Biodiversity: A Hierarchical Approach, Concer. Biol. 4(4), 355-364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patil, G. P. and Taillie, C.: 1982, Diversity as a concept and its measurement, J. Am. Stat. Ass. 77, 548-561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peet, R. K.: 1975, Relative diversity indices, Ecology 56, 496-498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pielou, E. C.: 1966, Shannon' formula as a measure of specific diversity: its use and misuse, Amer. Nat. 100, 463-465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pielou, E. C.: 1969, An Introduction to Mathematical Ecology, Wiley-Interscience, New York, 320 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pielou, E. C.: 1975, Ecological Diversity, Wiley Interscience, New-York, 165 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, F. W.: 1948, The commonness and rarity of species, Ecology 29, 254-283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, F. W.: 1962, The canonical distribution of commonness and rarity, Ecology 39, 185-215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qinghong, L.: 1995, A model for species diversity monitoring at community level and its applications, Environ. Monit. Assess. 34, 271-287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, M. and Couturier, G.: 1966, Les plateaux colorés en écologie entomologique, Annals de la Société Entomologique de France 2, 361-370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W. K.: 1989, ANOVA-like similarity analysis using expected species shared, Biometrics 45, 873-881.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somerfield, P. J. and Clarke, K. R.: 1995, Taxonomic levels in marine communities revisited, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 127, 113-119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snedecor, G. W. and Cochran, W. G.: 1967, Statistical Methods, Ames, Iowa, 503 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soulé M. E. and Wilcox, B. A.: 1980, Conservation Biology, Sinauer, Sunderland, 395 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southwood, T. R. E.: 1978, Ecological methods with particular reference to the study of insects populations, Chapman and Hall, London, 524 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spellerberg, I. F.: 1991, Monitoring Ecological Change, University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman, D. and Downing, J. A.: 1994, Biodiversity and stability in grasslands, Nature 367, 363-365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tokeshi, M.: 1990, Niche apportionment or random assortment: species abundance patterns revisited, J. Anin. Ecol. 59, 1129-1146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tokeshi, M.: 1993, Species Abundance Patterns and Community Structure, Adv. Ecol. Res. 24, 111-186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M. G. and Gardner, R. H.: 1991, Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology, Springer-Verlag, New-York, 458 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weither, E. and Boylen, C. W.: 1994, Patterns and prediction of alpha and beta diversity of aquatic plants in Adirondack lakes, Can. J. Bot. 72, 1797-1804.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P. H. and Gaston, K. J.: 1994, Measuring more of biodiversity: can higher-taxon richness predict wholesale species richness? Biol. Conserv. 67, 211-217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. B.: 1991, Methods for fitting dominance/diversity curves, J. Veget. Sci. 2, 35-46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. B. and Citay, S. H.: 1995, Community structure and assembly rules in a dune slack: Variance in richness, guild proportionality, biomass constancy and dominance/diversity relations, Vegetatio 116, 93-106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. B., Wells, T. C. E., Trueman, I. C., Jones, G., Atkinson, M. D., Crawley, M. L., Dodd, M. E. and Silvertown, J.: 1996, Are there assembly rules for plant species abundance? An investigation in relation to soil resources and successional trends, J. Ecol. 84, 527-538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. B., Gitay, H., Steel, J. B. and King, W. M.: 1998, Relative abundance distributions in plant communities: effects of species richness and of spatial scale, J. Veget. Sci. 9, 213-220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar, J. H.: 1984, Biostatistical analysis, Prentice-Hall International Editions, Englewood Cliffs, 718 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zipf, G. K.: 1965, Human behavior and principle of least effort, Addison-Wesley, Cambridge and Hefner, New York, 195 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Mouillot.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mouillot, D., Lepretre, A. Introduction of Relative Abundance Distribution (RAD) Indices, Estimated from the Rank-Frequency Diagrams (RFD), to Assess Changes in Community Diversity. Environ Monit Assess 63, 279–295 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006297211561

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006297211561

Navigation