Skip to main content
Log in

A New Probabilistic Induction Method

  • Published:
Journal of Automated Reasoning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Knowledge acquisition by interviewing a domain expert is one of the most problematic aspects of the development of expert systems. As an alternative, methods for inducing concept descriptions from examples have proven useful in eliminating this bottleneck. In this paper, we propose a probabilistic induction method (PIM), which is an improvement of the Chan and Wong method, for detecting relevant patterns implicit in a given data set. PIM uses the technique of residual analysis and several heuristics to effectively detect complex relevant patterns and to avoid the problem of combinatorial explosion. A reasonable trade-off between the induction time and the classification ratio is achieved. Moreover, PIM quickly classifies unknown objects using classification rules converted from the positively relevant patterns detected. Three experiments are conducted to confirm the validity of PIM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cendrowska, J.: PRISM: An algorithm for inducing modular rules, Int. J. Man–Machine Studies 27(1987), 349–370.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chan, K. C. C. and Wong, A. K. C.: Automatic construction of expert systems from data: A statistical approach, Proc. IJCAI’89 Workshop on Knowledge Discovery in Databases, 1989.

  3. Chan, K. C. C. and Wong, A. K. C.: Performance analysis of a probabilistic inductive learning system, in Proc. 5th Int. Conf. Machine Learning, 1990, pp. 16–23.

  4. Clark, P. and Niblett, T.: The CN2 induction algorithm, Machine Learning 3(1989), 261–283.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fillmer, J. F., Mellichamp, J. M., Miller, D. M., and Narayanan, S.: An expert system for wide area network component configuration, Expert Systems9(1) (1992), 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gisolfi, A. and Balzano, W.: Constructing and consulting the knowledge base of an expert system shell, Expert Systems 10(1) (1993), 29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Grimm, F. and Bunke, H.: An expert for the selection and application of image processing subroutines, Expert Systems 10(2) (1993), 61–71.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Haberman, S. J.: The analysis of residuals in cross-classified tables, Biometrics 29(1973), 205–220.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hong, T. P.: A Study of Parallel Processing and Noise Management on Machine Learning, Ph.D. dissertation, National Chiao-Tung University, Taiwan, R.O.C., Jan. 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hong, T. P. and Tseng, S. S.: Learning concept in parallel based upon the strategy of version space, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 6(6) (1994), 857–867.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hou, R. H.: A New Probabilistic Inductive Learning Method, Master’s thesis, National Chiao-Tung University, Taiwan, R.O.C., June 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jackson, A. H.: Machine learning, Expert Systems5(2) (1988), 132–149.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kodratoff, Y. and Michalski, R. S.: Machine Learning: An Artificial Intelligence Approach, Vol. 3, Toiga, Palo Alto, CA, 1990.

  14. Michalski, R. S., Carbonell, J. G., and Mitchell, T. M.: Machine Learning: An Artificial Intelligence Approach, Vol. 1, Toiga, Palo Alto, CA, 1983.

  15. Michalski, R. S., Carbonell, J. G., and Mitchell, T. M.: Machine Learning: An Artificial Intelligence Approach, Vol. 2, Toiga, Palo Alto, CA, 1984.

  16. Mingers, J.: An empirical comparison of pruning methods for decision tree induction, Machine Learning 4(1989), 319–342.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Quinlan, J. R.: Learning efficient classification procedures and their application to chess end games, in Machine Learning: An Artificial Intelligence Approach, Vol. 1, Toiga, Palo Alto, CA, 1983, pp. 463–482.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Quinlan, J. R.: The effect of noise on concept learning, in Machine Learning: An Artificial Intelligence Approach, Vol. 2, Toiga, Palo Alto, CA, 1984.

  19. Quinlan, J. R.: Simplifying decision trees, Int. J. Man–Machine Studies 27(1987), 221–234.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Safavian, S. R. and Landgrebe, D.: A survey of decision tree classifier methodology, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 21(3) (1991), 660–674.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Smyth, P. and Goodman, R. M.: An information theoretic approach to rule induction from database, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering4(21) (1992), 301–316.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wang, C. H. and Tseng, S. S.: A brain tumor diagnostic system with automatic learning abilities, in 3rd IEEE Symp. Computer-Based Medical Systems Conf., 1990, pp. 313–320.

  23. Witten, L. H. and Macdonald, B. A.: Using concept learning for knowledge acquisition, Int. J. Man–Machine Studies 29(1988), 171–196.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hou, RH., Hong, TP., Tseng, SS. et al. A New Probabilistic Induction Method. Journal of Automated Reasoning 18, 5–24 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005726727996

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005726727996

Navigation