Skip to main content
Log in

Performance Measurement in the Belgian Document Ordering and Delivery System Impala

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper deals with performance measures and performance indicators in the Impala electronic document ordering and delivery system for research libraries in Belgium and compares these with some international standards as, e.g., the ProLib/PI study commissioned by the European Commission.

Performance measures:

• Costs (clearinghouse principle)

• Number of ILL requests made to other libraries

• Number of ILL requests made to other libraries without success

• Number of ILL requests made to other libraries with success

• Number of ILL requests received from other libraries

• Number of ILL requests received from other libraries and not satisfied

• Number of ILL requests received from other libraries that were satisfied

• Frequency asked titles

Performance indicators:

• Success rate

• Borrowing-lending ratio per library

• Response times, split into several segments of the ILL-procedure

The article concludes with some indications for quality measurement in electronic document delivery where Impala will be able to measure the real supply times as perceived by the end user.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. Wressell (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2nd Northumbria International Conference on Performance Measurement in Libraries and Information Services held at Longhurst Management and Training Centre, Longhurst Hall, Northumberland, England, 7 to 11 September 1997, Newcastle upon Tyne, University of Northumbria at Newcastle. Department of Information and Library Management, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Impala http://lib.ua.ac.be/IMPALA/

  3. J. Van Borm, Impala: le système belge de commande électronique de documents, Lectures, 88 (1996) 28-35.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Antilope http://lib.ua.ac.be/ANTILOPE/

  5. F. Bakken, I. Nilsen, Charging in document delivery and interlending: the Scandinavian scene and surrounding discussion, In: Gould, S. (Ed.), Charging for document delivery and interlending, Boston Spa: IFLA Programme for Universal Availability of Publications, 1997, 31-34.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Van Borm, From interlibrary lending statistics to clearinghouse: the use of ILL statistics in Belgium, Scientometrics, 25 (1992) 89-100.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Ward et al., Library performance indicators and library management tools, European Commission, DGXIII-E3, Brussels-Luxembourg, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  8. ISO 11620: information and documentation — library performance indicators, London, ISO Secretariat.

  9. K. G. Saur, Measuring quality: international guidelines for performance measurement in academic libraries, IFLA publications, 76, 1996.

  10. HEFCE, The effective academic library: a framework for evaluating the performance of UK academic libraries, London, HEFCE, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  11. H. Moore, Measuring performance in public libraries — a draft manual, UNESCO 1989 (PGI-89/WS/3).

  12. DECIDE http://www.efc.co.uk/DECIDE/REPORT/DECIDETP.HTM

  13. DECIMAL http://www.mmu.ac.uk/h-ss/dic/research/decimal.htm

  14. EQLIPSE http://www.dcu.ie/library/eqlipse

  15. MINSTREL http://elsa.dmu.ac.uk/minstrel/

  16. CAMILE http:www.staff.dmu.ac.uk/~camile/

  17. M. Jackson, Measuring the performance of interlibrary loan operations in North American research and academic libraries, In: Gould, S. (Ed.), Charging for document delivery and interlending, Boston Spa: IFLA Programme for Universal Availability of Publications, 1997, 17-22.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. E. Jackson, Measuring the performance of interlibrary loan operations in North American research and college libraries, Washington D.C., Association of Research Libraries, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  19. H. Bjarno, Cost finding and performance measures in the ILL management, Interlending and Document Supply, 22(2) (1994) 8-11.

    Google Scholar 

  20. S. Gould (Ed.), Charging for document delivery and interlending, Boston Spa: IFLA Programme for Universal Availability of Publications, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  21. R. Huse et al., Interlibrary lending, Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 27 (1995) 237-239.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Measuring the performance of document supply, Boston Spa, IFLA International Office for UAP, 1987.

  23. J. Willemse, Improving interlending through goal setting and performance measurement, Interlending and Document Supply, 21(1) (1995) 13-17.

    Google Scholar 

  24. ASIDIC, Survey of document delivery service 1996: Report, ASIDIC, Athens (Georgia), 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  25. EUSIDIC-EUROLOG, Survey of document delivery services in Europe 1996: Report, EUSIDIC-EUROLOG, London, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  26. J. Van Borm, J. Corthouts R. Philips, Performance measurement in document delivery: the case of Impala, the Belgian document ordering system, In: P. Wressell et al. (Eds), Proceedings of the 2nd Northumbria International Conference on Performance Measurement in Libraries and Information Services held at Longhurst Management and Training Centre, Longhurst Hall, Northumberland, England, 7 to 11 September 1997, Newcastle upon Tyne, University of Northumbria at Newcastle. Department of Information and Library Management, 1998, Newcastle upon Tyne, 1998, 441-451.

    Google Scholar 

  27. R. Rousseau, H. D. L. Vervliet, A prediction of the potential interlending demand in the European Community, Libri, 40(4) (1990) 278-294.

    Google Scholar 

  28. M. B. Line, Co-operation: The triumph of hope over experience? Interlending and Document Supply, 25(2) (1997) 64-72.

    Google Scholar 

  29. M. E. Jackson, Measuring the performance, op. cit., p. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  30. J. Kleiner, A. Hammaker, Libraries 2000: transforming libraries using document delivery, needs assessment, and networked resources, College and Research Libraries, 58(4) (1997) 355-374.

    Google Scholar 

  31. M. B. Line, Access as a substitute for holdings: false ideal or costly reality? Interlending and Document Supply, 23(2) (1995) 28-30.

    Google Scholar 

  32. M. Montgomery, The virtual collection and its impact on traditional document delivery services, In: S. Gould and D. Johnson (Eds), Interlending and Document Supply: Resource sharing possibilities and barriers, 1998, pp 209-215.

  33. F. Williams, Electronic document delivery, Ariadne, 10 (1997) http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue10/edd/

  34. VirLib http://lib.ua.ac.be/VIRLIB/

  35. A. Spoiden, J. Van Borm, Le prêt inter-bibliothèques belge entre dans l'ėre des nouvelles technologies: VIRLIB-PROVIRLIB, Cahiers de la documentation, (2) (1999) 59-65.

  36. L. Waaijers, Opinion paper: towards a new system of scholarly communication, Interlending and Document Supply, 25(2) (1997) 77-78.

    Google Scholar 

  37. J. Watkins, Copyright issues in libraries: global concerns, local solutions, Boston Spa, IFLA Office for Universal Availability of Publications, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  38. S. Norman, Copyright issues in document supply, In: S. Gould and D. Johnson (Eds), Interlending and document supply: Resource sharing possibilities and barriers, 1998, pp 77-87.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Borm, J., Corthouts, J. & Philips, R. Performance Measurement in the Belgian Document Ordering and Delivery System Impala. Scientometrics 47, 207–225 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005630824825

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005630824825

Keywords

Navigation