Abstract
The transition from the traditional to the representational theory of measurement around the turn of the century was accompanied by little sustained criticism of the former. The most forceful critique was Bertrand Russell's 1897 Mind paper, ‘On the relations of number and quantity’. The traditional theory has it that real numbers unfold from the concept of continuous quantity. Russell's critique identified two serious problems for this theory: (1) can magnitudes of a continuous quantity be defined without infinite regress; and (2) can additive relations between such magnitudes exist if magnitudes are not divisible? The present paper shows how the traditional theory answers these questions and compares the traditional and representational theories as contributions to our understanding of the logic of application.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Anderson, J.: 1963, Studies in Empirical Philosophy, Angus and Robertson, Sydney.
Armstrong, D. M.: 1978a, Nominalism and Realism, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Armstrong, D. M.: 1978b, A Theory ofUniversals, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Armstrong, D. M.: 1987, ‘Comments on Swoyer and Forge’ in J. Forge (ed.), Measurement, Realism and Objectivity, pp. 311–317, Reidel, Holland.
Armstrong, D. M.: 1989, Universals, Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.
Bigelow, J.: 1988, The Reality of Numbers: A Physicalist's Philosophy of Mathematics, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Birkhoff, G.: 1948, Lattice Theory, American Mathematical Society, New York.
Bostock, D.: 1979, Logic and Arithmetic, Volume 2: Rational and Irrational Numbers, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Campbell, N. R.: 1920, Physics, the Elements, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Couturat, L.: 1896, De l'Infini Mathématique, Félix Alcan, Paris.
Dedekind, R.: 1872, Essays on the Theory of Numbers (trans. W. W. Beman), Open Court, Chicago.
De Morgan, A.: 1836, The Connexion of Number and Magnitude, Taylor and Walton, London.
Doignon, J.-P.: 1993, ‘Geometry is Measurement but Measurement Theory is More than Geometry', Journal of Mathematical Psychology 37, 472–476.
Dummett, M.: 1991, Frege: Philosophy of Mathematics, Duckworth, London.
Forrest, P. and D. M. Armstrong: 1987, ‘The Nature of Number', Philosophical Papers 16, 165–186.
Frege, G.: 1884, Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik, Wilhelm Koebner, Breslau.
Frege, G.: 1903, Grundgesetze der Arithmetik, Volume 2, Georg Olms, Hildesheim.
Griffin, N.: 1991, Russell's Idealist Apprenticeship, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Griffin, N. and A. C. Lewis (eds.): 1990, The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, Volume 2, Unwin Hyman, London.
Hager, P. J.: 1994, Continuity and Change in the Development of Russell's Philosophy, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Heath, T. L.: 1908, The Thirteen Books of Euclid's Elements, Volume 2, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Helmholtz, von H.: 1887, ‘An Epistemological Analysis of Counting and Measurement', in R. Kahl (ed.), Selected Writings of Hermann von Helmholtz, Wesleyan University Press, Connecticut.
Hölder, O.: 1901, ‘Die Axiome der Quantität und die Lehre vom Mass', Berichte über die Verhandlungen der Königlich Sachsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig, Mathematische-Physicke Klasse, 53, 1–64.
Hylton, P.: 1990, Russell, Idealism, and the Emergence of Analytical Philosophy, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Jarrard, H. G. and D. B. McNeill: 1992, Dictionary of Scientific Units, sixth edition, Chapman and Hall, London.
Krantz, D. H., R. D. Luce, P. Suppes, and A. Tversky: 1971, Foundations of Measurement, Volume 1, Academic Press, New York.
Luce, R. D.: 1985, ‘Mathematical Modeling of Perceptual, Learning, andCognitive Processes', in S. Koch and D. E. Leary (eds.), A Century of Psychology as Science, pp. 654–677, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Luce, R. D., Krantz, D. H., Suppes, P., and Tversky, A.: 1990, Foundations of Measurement, Volume 3, Academic Press, San Diego.
Luce, R. D. and J. W. Tukey: 1964, ‘Similtaneous Conjoint Measurement: A New Type of Fundamental Measurement', Journal of Mathematical Psychology 1, 1–27.
Michell, J.: 1990, An Introduction to the Logic of Psychological Measurement, Erlbaum, New Jersey.
Michell, J.: 1993a, ‘Numbers, Ratios, and Structural Relations', Australasian Journal of Philosophy 71, 325–332.
Michell, J.: 1993b, ‘The Origins of the Representational Theory of Measurement: Helmholtz, Hölder, and Russell', Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 74, 185–206.
Michell, J.: 1994, ‘Numbers as Quantitative Relations and the Traditional Theory of Measurement', British Journal for Philosophy of Science 45, 389–406.
Michell, J.: 1995, ‘Further Thoughts on Realism, Representationalism, and the Foundations of Measurement Theory', Journal of Mathematical Psychology 39, 243–247.
Michell, J. and Ernst, C.: 1996, ‘The Axioms of Quantity and the Theory of Measurement, Part I', an English translation of Hölder (1901), Part I. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 40, 235–252.
Michell, J. and Ernst, C.: 1994, ‘The Axioms of Quantity and the Theory of Measurement, Part II', an English translation of Hölder (1901), Part II. Submitted for publication.
Mill, J. S.: 1843, A System of Logic, J. W. Parker, London.
Mundy, B.: 1987, ‘The Metaphysics of Quantity', Philosophical Studies 51, 29–54.
Nagel, E.: 1932, ‘Measurement', Erkenntnis 2, 313–333.
Narens, L.: 1985, Abstract Measurement Theory, MIT Press, Massachusetts.
Narens, L. and R. D. Luce: 1986, ‘Measurement: the Theory of Numerical Assignments', Psychological Bulletin 99, 166–180.
Narens, L. and R. D. Luce: 1990, ‘Three Aspects of the Effectiveness of Mathematics in Science', in R. E. Mirkin (ed.), Mathematics and Science, pp 122–135, World Scientific Press, Singapore.
Newton, I.: 1728, ‘Universal Arithmetic', in D. T. Whiteside (ed., 1967), The Mathematical Works of Isaac Newton, Volume 2, pp. 2–134, Johnson Reprint Corp., New York.
Nierderée, R.: 1992, ‘What do Numbers Measure? A New Approach to Fundamental Measurement', Mathematical Social Sciences 24, 237–76.
Pap, A.: 1959, ‘Are Physical Magnitudes Operationally Definable?', in C. W. Churchman and P. Ratoosh (eds.), Measurement: Theories and Definitions, pp. 177–191, Wiley, New York.
Quine, W. V.: 1941, ‘Whitehead and Modern Logic', in P. A. Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of Alfred North Whitehead, pp. 125–163, Northwestern University Press, Chicago.
Quinton, A.: 1973, The Nature of Things, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Russell, B.: 1897, ‘On the Relations of Number and Quantity', Mind 6, 326–341.
Russell, B.: 1901, ‘On the Notion of Order', Mind 10, 30–51.
Russell, B.: 1903, Principles of Mathematics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Russell, B.: 1919, Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy, Routledge, London.
Russell, B.: 1959, My Philosophical Development, George Allen and Unwin, London.
Stevens, S. S.: 1946, ‘On the Theory of Scales of Measurement', Science 103, 667–680.
Stevens, S. S.: 1951, ‘Mathematics, Measurement and Psychophysics', in S. S. Stevens (ed.), Handbook of Experimental Psychology, pp. 1–49, Wiley, New York.
Suppes, P.: 1951, ‘A Set of Independent Axioms for Extensive Quantities’, Portugaliae Mathematica 10, 163–172.
Suppes, P. and, H, Zinnes: 1963, ‘Basic Measurement Theory', in R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush and B. Galanter (eds.), Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, Volume 1, pp. 1–76, Wiley, New York.
Swoyer, C.: 1987, ‘The Metaphysics of Measurement', in J. Forge (ed.), Measurement, Realism and Objectivity, pp. 235–90, Reidel, Holland.
Swoyer, C.: 1991, ‘Structural Representation and Surrogative Reasoning', Synthese 87, 449–508.
Whitehead, A. N. and B. Russell: 1913, Principia mathematica, Volume 3, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Michell, J. BERTRAND RUSSELL'S 1897 CRITIQUE OF THE TRADITIONAL THEORY OF MEASUREMENT. Synthese 110, 257–276 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004985226963
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004985226963