Abstract
Algorithms for estimating root length by image analysis should lead to results that have no systematic error (bias), be insensitive to preferential root orientation, valid across a wide range of sample sizes and adjust for overlap between roots in samples, to reduce the effort needed in spreading out root systems. We propose a new algorithm that forms a compromise between small bias and robustness (insensitivity to variation in sample size and preferential root orientation), and provide a simple way of dealing with root overlap. Image analysis was performed on a Macintosh computer using the public domain NIH Image program. The digital image of the root was processed to get the thinned image (skeleton). The numbers of orthogonally and diagonally connected pairs of pixels (N o and N d, respectively) in the skeleton were counted separately and used for length (L) calculation. A new length calculation equation was introduced so that the effect of orientation on length calculation was minimized; L=[N d 2+(N d+N o/2)2]1/2+N o/2. The maximum error due to orientation of a single line was evaluated for an ideal line, and the analysis revealed that the new equation was less affected by orientation than previous equations. Copper wire and rice (Oryza sativa L.) roots containing both primary and fine secondary root were measured manually and with image analysis. The two methods showed good agreement within 1.5%. The proposed image analysis method yielded length estimates with CV from 0.23 to 0.88%, which was lower than the CVs of the line-intersect method. Moreover, the lengths of overlapping samples were calculated correctly because the image analysis method distinguished an overlapping pixel from a thinned image, while the calculation with the line-intersect method showed underestimation because overlaps were not considered in that method.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Box J E Jr 1996 Modern methods for root investigations. In Plant Roots: the Hidden Half. Eds Y Waisel A Eshel and U Kafkafi. Marcel Dekker, New York, USA.
Chikushi J, Yoshida S and Eguchi H 1990 A new mtehod for measurement of root length by image processing. Biotronics 19, 129–135.
Berntson G M 1992 A computer program for characterizing root system branching patterns. Plant Soil 140, 145–149.
Dorst L and Smeulders A W M 1987 Length estimators for digitized contours. Comput. Vision Graphics Image Process. 40, 311–333.
Ewing R P and Kaspar T C 1995 Accurate perimeter and length measurement using an edge chord algorithm. J. Comput. Assist. Microsc. 7, 91–100.
Farrell R E, Walley F L, Lukey A P and Germida J J 1993 Manual and digital line-intercept methods of measuring root length: a comparison. Agron. J. 85,1233–1237.
Freeman H 1970 Boundary encoding and processing. In Picture Processing and Psychopictorics. Eds B S Lipkin and A Rosenfeld. pp 241–266. Academic Press, New York, USA.
Glasbey C A and Horgan G W 1995 Image Analysis for the Biological Sciences. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, 164 p.
Harris G A and Campbell G S 1989 Automated quantification of roots using simple image analyzer. Agron. J. 81, 935–938.
Kaspar T C and Ewing R P 1997 ROOTEDGE: software for measuring root length from desktop scanner images. Agron. J. 89, 932–940.
Kirchhof G 1992 Measurement of root length and thickness using a hand held computer scanner. Field Crops Res. 29, 79–88.
Krstansky J J and Henderson G S 1989 Computerized measurement of fine root length using a desktop image scanner. In Agronomy abstracts. p 307. ASA, Madison, WI, USA.
Kulpa Z 1977 Area and perimeter measurement of blobs in discrete binary pictures. Comput. Vision Graphics Image Process. 6, 434–454.
Lebowitz R J 1988 Digital image analysis measurement of root length and diameter. Environ. Exp. Bot. 28, 267–273.
Montanari U 1970 A note on minimal length polygonal approximation to a digitized contour. Commun. ACM 13, 41–47.
Murphy S L and Smucker A J M 1995 Evaluation of video image analysis and line-intercept methods for measuring root system of alfalfa and ryegrass. Agron. J. 87, 865–868.
Newman E I 1966 A method of estimating the total root length in a sample. J. Appl. Ecol. 3, 139–145.
Pan W L and Bolton R P 1991 Root Quantification by edge discrimination using a desktop scanner. Agron. J. 83, 1047–1052.
Rasband W S and Bright D S 1995 A public domain image processing program for the Macintosh. Microbeam Anal. 4, 137–149.
Richards D, Goubran F H, Garwoli W N and Daly M W. 1979 A machine for determining root length. Plant Soil 52, 69–76.
Russ J C 1994 The Image Processing Handbook, 2nd ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 155 p.
Smit A L, Sprangers J F C M, Sablik P W and Groenwold J 1994 Automated measurement of root length with a three-dimensional high-resolution scanner and image analysis. Plant Soil 158, 145–149.
Smucker A J M, Ferguson J C, DeBruyn W P, Belford R K and Ritchie J T 1987 Image analysis of video-recorded plant root systems. In Minirhizotron Observation Tubes: Methods and Applications for Measuring Rhizosphere Dynamics. Ed. H M Taylor. pp 67–80. ASA Special Publication No. 50. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, USA.
Tanaka S, Yamauchi S and Kono S 1995 Easily accessible method for root length measurement using an image analysis system. Jpn. J. Crop Sci. 64(1), 144–147.
Tennant D 1975 A test of a modified line-intersect method of estimating root length. J. Ecol. 63, 95–1001.
Vossepoel A M and Smeulders A W M 1982 Vector code probability and metrication error in the representation of straight lines of finite length. Comput. Graphics Image Process. 20, 347–364.
Zoon F C and P H Van Tienderen 1990 A rapid quantitative measurement of root length and root branching by microcomputer image analysis. Plant Soil 126, 301–308.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kimura, K., Kikuchi, S. & Yamasaki, Si. Accurate root length measurement by image analysis. Plant and Soil 216, 117–127 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004778925316
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004778925316