Skip to main content
Log in

The Top-Down Strategy for Building EuroWordNet: Vocabulary Coverage, Base Concepts and Top Ontology

  • Published:
Computers and the Humanities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes two fundamental aspects in the process of building of the EuroWordNet database. In EuroWordNet we have chosen for a flexible design in which local wordnets are built relatively independently as language-specific structures, which are linked to an Inter-Lingual-Index (ILI). To ensure compatibility between the wordnets, a core set of common concepts has been defined that has to be covered by every language. Furthermore, these concepts have been classified via the ILI in terms of a Top Ontology of 63 fundamental semantic distinctions used in various semantic theories and paradigms. This paper first discusses the process leading to the definition of the set of Base Concepts, and the structure and the rationale of the Top Ontology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvar M. (ed.) Diccionario General Ilustrado de la Lengua Española VOX. Barcelona: Biblograf S.A., 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agirre E. and G. Rigau. “Word Sense Disambiguation using Conceptual Density”. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING'96). Copenhagen, 1996.

  • Bateman, J., B. Magnini and J. Rinaldi. “The Generalised Upper Model”. Proceedings of ECAI. 1994.

  • Boersma, P. The Sift Lexical Database, Sift LRE 62030, Deliverable D10b. University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, D.R. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gangemi, A., G. Steve and F. Giacomelli. “Onions: An Ontological Methodology for Taxonomic Knowledge Integration”. In Proceedings of Workshop on Ontological Engineering, ECAI'96. Budapest, 1996, pp. 29–40.

  • Guarino, N. “Semantic Matching: Formal Ontological Distinctions for Information Organization, Extraction, and Integration”. In Information Extraction: A Multidisciplinary Approach to an Emerging Information Technology. Ed. M. T. Pazienza, Springer Verlag, 1997, pp. 139–170.

  • Gruber, T. R. Ontolingua: a Mechanism to Support Portable Ontologies. Report KSL 91-66. Stanford University, 1992.

  • Knight, K. and S. Luk. “Building a Large-Scale Knowledge Base for Machine Translation”. Proceedings of AAAI'94. 1994.

  • Lakoff, G. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenat, D. and R. Guha. Building Large Knowledge-based Systems. Representation and Inference in the CYC Project. Addison Wesley, 1990.

  • Levin, B. English Verb Classes and Alternations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, J. Semantics. London: Cambridge University Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin W. and J. Tops. Groot woordenboek Engels-Nederlands. Utrecht: Van Dale Lexicografie, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G., R. Beckwith, C. Fellbaum, D. Gross and K. Miller. Five Papers on WordNet. CSL Report 43. Cognitive Science Laboratory, Princeton University, 1990.

  • Procter, P. (ed.) Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English. Harlow and London: Longman, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pustejovsky, J. “The Syntax of Event Structure”. Cognition, 41 (1991), 47–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pustejovsky, J. The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E. “Human Categorisation”. In Studies in Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol. I. Ed. N. Warren, London: Academic Press, 1977, pp. 1–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, J. (ed.) Collins COBUILD English Dictionary. London: Harper Collins Publishers, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sowa, J. Knowledge Representation: Logical, Philosophical, and Computational Foundations. Boston: PWS Publishing Co., forthcoming.

  • Vendler, Z. Linguistics and Philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verkuyl, H. On the compositional Nature of the Aspects. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verkuyl, H. “Aspectual Classes and Aspectual Distinctions”. Linguistics and Philosiphy, 12 (1989), 39–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vossen P. and A. Bon. Building a Semantic Hierarchy for the Sift Project, Sift LRE 62030, Deliverable D20b. University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vossen, P. (ed.) Encoding the Semantic Relations for basic Nouns and Verbs. Deliverable D010D011. LE-4002. Amsterdam, 1997.

  • VOX-HARRAP'S Diccionario Esencial Español-Inglés Inglés-Español. Barcelona: Biblograf S.A., 1992.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rodríguez, H., Climent, S., Vossen, P. et al. The Top-Down Strategy for Building EuroWordNet: Vocabulary Coverage, Base Concepts and Top Ontology. Computers and the Humanities 32, 117–152 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1001169525131

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1001169525131

Navigation