Abstract
Ditransitive verbs such as send and give appear in two distinct structures in English, the double object and the to-dative constructions. It is well known that the two differ semantically and syntactically. In some recent works, it is suggested that the semantic differences observed by Bresnan (1978), Oehrle (1976) and others, and the structural properties noted by Barss and Lasnik (1986), Larson (1988), and others, can both be captured by postulating an extra head for the Double Object Construction (DOC, e.g., Marantz (1993), Harley (1995), Pylkkänen (2002)). This head, which corresponds to the applicative head in Bantu languages, takes the goal as its specifier and relates it either to the VP that contains the verb and the theme (Marantz (1993)), or directly to the theme (Pylkkänen (2002)). The applicative head contributes the meaning distinct to the DOC, and it gives rise to the hierarchical structure noted by Barss and Lasnik. This applicative head is missing in the to-dative so that this construction has an argument structure distinct from the DOC. In this paper, we will look at the corresponding construction(s) in Japanese. Unlike English, Japanese appears to have only one structure, in which the goal is marked with the dative and the theme with the accusative case marking. The goal-theme order is assumed to be the basic order (Hoji (1985), Takano (1998), Yatsushiro (1998, 2003)). The only variation is that the theme can occur before the goal, but this is viewed simply as an instance of optional scrambling. We will give arguments that the difference between English and Japanese is only apparent. With close scrutiny, we find that the two argument structures corresponding to the DOC and the to-dative in English exist in Japanese.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Aikawa, Takako (1995) “Remarks and Replies: 'Reflexivity' by Reinhart and Reuland (1993),” ms., MIT.
Aldridge, Edith (2001) “Hentai Kanbun Perspective on Short Scrambling,” Journal of East Asian Linguistics 10, 169-200.
Anagnostopoulou, Elena (1999) “On Clitics, Feature Movement and Double Object Alternations,” NELS 29, Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the Northeast Linguistic Society, University of Delaware, Papers from the Poster Session, pp. 40-55.
Anagnostopoulou, Elena (2003) The Syntax of Ditransitives, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin/New York.
Aoun, Joseph and Yen-hui Audrey Li (1989) “Constituency and Scope,” Linguistic Inquiry 20, 141-172.
Barss, Andrews and Howard Lasnik (1986) “A Note on Anaphora and Double Objects,” Linguistic Inquiry 17, 347-354.
Bresnan, Joan (1978) Class notes (as quoted in Gropen et al. 1989).
Bresnan, Joan (1982) The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Bresnan, Joan and Tatiana Nikitina (2003) “Categoricity and Gradience in the Dative Alternation.” ms., Stanford University, paper presented at MIT on May 4, 2003.
Bruening, Benjamin (2001) “QR Obeys Superiority: Frozen Scope and ACD,” Linguistic Inquiry 4, 275-343.
Chomsky, Noam (1981) Lectures on Government and Binding, Dordrecht, Foris.
Chomsky, Noam. (1993) “Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory,” in K. Hale and S. J. Keyser (eds.), The View from Building 20, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 1-52.
Chomsky, Noam (2001) “Derivation by Phase,” in M. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 1-52.
Cuervo, Cristina, in press, “Structural Asymmetry but Same Word Order: the Dative Alternation in Spanish,” in A. M. di Sciullo (ed.), Symmetry in Grammar, Benjamins, Amsterdam.
Fukui, Naoki (1993) “Parameter and Optionality in a Grammar,” Linguistic Inquiry 24, 399-420.
Gropen, Jess, Steven Pinker, Michelle Hollander, Richard Goldberg, and Ronald Wilson (1989) “The Learnability and Acquisition of the Dative Alternation in English,” Language 65, 203-257.
Haig, John (1980) “Some Observations on Quantifier Floating in Japanese,” Linguistics 18, 11-12 (237-238), 1065-1083.
Harley, Heidi (1995) Subjects, Events, and Licensing, PhD dissertation, MIT.
Hoji, Hajime (1985) Logical Form Constraints and Configurational Structures in Japanese, PhD dissertation, University of Washington.
Hoji, Hajime (1995) “Demonstrative Binding and Principle B,” Proceedings of the Northeast Linguistic Society 25, 255-271.
Hornstein, Norbert (1995) Logical Form, Blackwell, Oxford.
Johnson, Kyle, and Satoshi Tomioka (1997) “Lowering and Mid-size Clauses,” in G. Katz, S.-S. Kim, and H. Winhart (eds.), Reconstruction: Proceedings of the 1997 Tübingen Workshop, Universität Stuttgart and Universität Tübingen, pp. 185-206.
Kishimoto, Hideki (2001) “The Role of Lexical Meanings in Argument Encoding: Double Object Verbs in Japanese,” Gengo Kenkyu [Language Research] 120, 35-65.
Kitagawa, Yoshihisa (1994) “Shells, Yolks, and Scrambled E.g.s,” NELS 24, Proceedings of the 24th Conference of the Northeast Linguistic Society, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, pp. 221-239.
Koizumi, Masatoshi (1995) Phrase Structure in Minimalist Syntax, PhD dissertation, MIT.
Kratzer, Angelika (1996) “Severing the External Argument from its Verb,” in J. Rooryck and L. Zaring (eds.), Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 109-137.
Kubo, Miori (1992) Japanese Syntactic Structures and Their Constructional Meanings, PhD dissertation, MIT.
Kuroda, S.-Y. (1971) “Remarks on the Notion of Subject with Reference to Words like also, even, or only, Illustrating Certain Manners in which Formal Systems are Employed as Auxiliary Devices in Linguistic Descriptions Part II,” in Annual Bulletin 4. Logopedics and Phoniatrics Research Institute, University of Tokyo, 127-152 (Reprinted in Papers in Japanese Linguistics 11, 157-202.)
Kuroda, S.-Y. (1993) “On the Scope Principle and Scope Ambiguities in Japanese,” ms., University of California, San Diego, and Kanda University of International Studies.
Larson, Richard (1988) “On the Double Object Construction,” Linguistic Inquiry 19, 335-391.
Mahajan, Anoop (1990) The A/A-bar Distinction and Movement Theory, PhD dissertation, MIT.
Marantz, Alec (1993) “Implications of Asymmetries in Double Object Construction,” in S. Mchombo (ed.), Theoretical Aspect of Bantu Grammar, CSLI Publications, Stanford, California, pp. 113-150.
Mazurkewich, Irene and Lydia White (1984) “The Acquisition of the Dative Alternation: Unlearning Overgeneralizations.” Cognition 16, 261-283.
McGinnis, Martha (1998) Locality in A-movement, PhD dissertation, MIT.
McGinnis, Martha (2002) “Object Asymmetries in a Phase Theory of Syntax,” in J. T. Jensen and G. van Herk (eds.), Proceedings of the 2001 CLA Annual Conference, Cahiers Linguistiques d'Ottawa, pp. 133-144.
Miyagawa, Shigeru (1989) Structure and Case Marking in Japanese, Syntax and Semantics 22, Academic Press, New York.
Miyagawa, Shigeru (1995) “Scrambling as an Obligatory Movement,” Proceedings of the Nanzan Conference on Japanese Linguistics and Language Teaching, Nanzan University, Nagoya, Japan.
Miyagawa, Shigeru (1996) “Word Order Restrictions and Nonconfigurationality,” in M. Koizumi, M. Oishi, and U. Sauerland (eds.), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 29: Formal Approaches to Japanese Linguistics 2, pp. 117-141.
Miyagawa, Shigeru (1997) “Against Optional Scrambling,” Linguistic Inquiry 28, 1-26.
Miyagawa, Shigeru (2003) “QR/Scrambling Correlations and the Notion of Phase,” ms., MIT. Nakayama, S. (1982) On English and Japanese Pronouns, M.A. thesis, University of Tokyo.
Oerhle, Richard (1976) The Grammatical Status of the English Dative Alternation, PhD dissertation, MIT.
Pesetsky, David (1995) Zero Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge.
Pesetsky, David (1998) “Some Optimality Principles of Sentence Pronunciation,” in P. Barbosa et. al. (eds.), Is the Best Good Enough? Optimality and Competition in Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 337-383.
Pinker, Steven (1989) Learnability and Cognition: the Acquisition of Argument Structure, MIT Press, Cambridge.
Pylkkänen, Liina (2002) Introducing Arguments, PhD dissertation, MIT.
Reinhart, Tanya (1983) Anaphora and Semantic Interpretation, Croom Helm, London.
Richards, Norvin (1997) “Competition and Disjoint Reference,” Linguistic Inquiry 28, 178-186.
Richards, Norvin (2001) “An Idiomatic Argument for Lexical Decomposition,” Linguistic Inquiry 32, 183-192.
Rizzi, Luigi (1986) “On Chain Formation,” in H. Borer (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 19: The Syntax of Pronominal Clitics, Academic Press, New York.
Saito, Mamoru (1992) “Long Distance Scrambling in Japanese,” Journal of East Asian Linguistics 1, 69-118.
Saito, Mamoru and Hajime Hoji (1983) “Weak Crossover and Move á in Japanese,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1, 245-259.
Saito, Mamoru and Naoki Fukui (1998) “Order in Phrase Structure and Movement,” Linguistic Inquiry 29, 439-474.
Shibatani, Masayoshi (1978) “Mikami Akira and the Notion of 'subject' in Japanese Grammar,” in J. Hinds and I. Howard (eds.), Problems in Japanese Syntax and Semantics, Kaitakusha, Tokyo.
Snyder, William (1992) “Chain-formation and Crossover,” ms., MIT.
Tada, Hiroaki (1993) A/A ' Partition in Derivation, PhD dissertation, MIT.
Takano, Yuji (1998) “Object Shift and Scrambling,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16, 817-889.
Takezawa, Koichi (2000) “Kuukan-hyoogen-no Tougoron-Kou-to jutsubu-no Tairitsu-ni Motozuku Apuroochi [The syntax of location expressions-an approach based on the tension between the predicate and the clause],” in S. Aoki and K. Takezawa (eds.), Kuukann Hyoogenn-to Bunpoo [Location expressions and grammar], Kurosio, Tokyo.
Watanabe, Akira (1996) “Nominative-Genitive Conversion and Agreement in Japanese: A Cross-linguistic Perspective,” Journal of East Asian Linguistics 5, 373-410.
Yatsushiro, Kazuko (1998) “Structure within VP in Japanese,” in D. Silva (ed.), Proceedings of Japanese-Korean Linguistics 8, CSLI, Stanford, pp. 501-514.
Yatsushiro, Kazuko (2003) “VP Internal Scrambling,” Journal of East Asian Linguistics 12, 141-170.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Miyagawa, S., Tsujioka, T. Argument Structure and Ditransitive Verbs in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 13, 1–38 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JEAL.0000007345.64336.84
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JEAL.0000007345.64336.84