Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T07:06:49.778Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Family Inventory of Needs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 June 2021

Zeynep Sağlam
Affiliation:
Health Science Faculty, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey
Zeliha Koç*
Affiliation:
Health Science Faculty, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey
*
Author for correspondence: Zeliha Koç, Health Science Faculty, Ondokuz Mayıs University, University Campus, 55312 Samsun, Turkey. E-mail: zelihaceren@hotmail.com

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this methodological study was to test the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Family Inventory of Needs.

Methods

The universe of the study consisted of 300 family members of inpatients hospitalized in the palliative care units of four hospitals in northern Turkey between April 12, 2019 and December 30, 2019. The translation process was performed in multiple stages using the forward–backward translation model. The reliability of the Family Inventory of Needs was evaluated using the Cronbach α reliability coefficient and item-total score correlations. Exploratory factor analyses were applied to examine the factor structure of the scale and its construct validity. To test the time invariance of the scale, the relationships between the scores obtained from the first and second applications were examined using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results

The Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin value of the Family Inventory of Needs was found to be 0.893. The items of the Family Inventory of Needs were found to explain 45.23% of the total variance in scores. The Turkish form of the scale consisted of the importance and fulfillment subdimensions, and had 19 items. The ICCs of the test–retest scores of the importance and fulfillment subdimensions of the Family Inventory of Needs were found to be, respectively, ICC = 1.000 and ICC = 0.730 with a positive, linear, and highly significant relationship between the scores. The item-total score correlation coefficients of the scale were found to vary between 0.920 and 0.908 in the importance subdimension, and between 0.930 and 0.922 in the fulfillment subdimension.

Significance of results

The Turkish version of the Family Inventory of Needs was found to be a valid and reliable measurement tool that can be safely used with the family members of Turkish inpatients.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Areia, NP, Major, S and Relvas, AP (2017) Measuring family needs of people living with cancer. Portuguese validation and descriptive studies of the family inventory of needs. European Journal of Oncology Nursing 30, 2228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beaton, DE, Bombardier, C, Guillemin, F, et al. (2000) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 25(2), 31863191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buzgova, R, Spatenkova, N, Fukasova-Hajnova, E, et al. (2016) Assessing needs of family members of inpatients with advanced cancer. European Journal of Cancer Care 25, 592599.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fridriksdottir, N, Sigurdardottir, V and Gunnarsdottir, S (2006) Important needs of families in acute and palliative care settings assessed with the family inventory of needs. Palliative Medicine 20, 425432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fridriksdottir, N, Sævarsdottir, P, Halfdanardottir, SI, et al. (2011) Family members of cancer patients: Needs, quality of life and symptoms of anxiety and depression. Acta Oncologica 50, 252258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Girgis, A, Lambert, S, Johnson, C, et al. (2013) Physical, psychosocial, relationship, and economic burden of caring for people with cancer: A review. Journal of Oncology Practice 9(4), 197202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hashemi, M, Irajpour, A and Taleghani, F (2018) Caregivers needing care: The unmet needs of the family caregiversof end-of-life cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 26, 759766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, PL, Aranda, S and Kristjanson, LJ (2004) Meeting the supportive needs of family caregivers in palliative care: Challenges for health professionals. Journal of Palliative Medicine 7(1), 1925.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hudson, P, Zordan, R and Trauer, T (2011) Research priorities associated with family caregivers in palliative care: International perspectives. Journal of Palliative Medicine 14(4), 397401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Izquierdo, I, Olea, J and Abad, FJ (2014) Exploratory factor analysis in validation studies: Uses and recommendations. Psicothema 26(3), 395400.Google ScholarPubMed
Karagöz, Y (2017). SPSS ve Amos Uygulamalı Nitel- Nicel Karma Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri Ve Yayın Etiği. Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık Eğitim ve Danışmanlık Tic. Ltd. Şti., 1. Baskı, pp. 24–39 (in Turkish).Google Scholar
Kristjanson, LJ and Aoun, S (2004) Palliative care for families: Remembering the hidden patients. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 49(6), 359365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kristjanson, LJ, Atwood, J and Degner, LF (1995) Validity and reliability of the family inventory of needs (FIN): Measuring the care needs of families of advanced cancer patients. Journal of Nursing Measurement 3, 109126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lund, L, Ross, L, Petersen, MA, et al. (2014) Cancer caregiving tasks and consequences and their associations with caregiver status and the caregiver's relationship to the patient: A survey. BMC Cancer 14, 541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Márquez García, IF, Grau Abalo, J, Infante Pedreira, OE, et al. (2015) Primary validation scales for the training of care givers of oncological-geriatric patients of boyeros municipality. Revista del Hospital Psiquiátrico de La Habana 12 (1), 115.Google Scholar
Nelson, JE, Puntillo, KA, Pronovost, PJ, et al. (2010) In their own words: Patients and families define high-quality palliative care in the intensive care unit. Critical Care in Medicine 38(3), 808818.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Obringer, K, Hilgenberg, C and Booker, K (2012) Needs of adult family members of intensive care unit patients. Journal of Clinical Nursing 21, 16511658.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Rourke, N and Hatcher, L (2013). Step-by-Step Approach to Using the SAS System for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling, 2nd ed. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.Google Scholar
Özdamar, K (2017). Eğitim, Sağlık Ve Davranış Bilimlerinde Ölçek Ve Test Geliştirme Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi IBM SPSS, IBM SPSS AMOS Ve MINITAB Uygulamalı. Nisan Kitabevi, 2. Baskı, Eskişehir, pp. 65–154 (in Turkish).Google Scholar
Polit, DF and Beck, CT (2010) Essentials of Nursing Research: Appraising Evidence for Nursing Practice, 7th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health – Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
Preisler, M, Rohrmoser, A, Goerling, U, et al. (2019) Early palliative care for those who care: A qualitative exploration of cancer caregivers’ information needs during hospital stays. European Journal of Cancer Care 28, e12990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rha, SY, Park, Y, Song, SK, et al. (2015) Caregiving burden and the quality of life of family caregivers of cancer patients: The relationship and correlates. European Journal of Oncology Nursing 19(4), 376382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schur, S, Neubauer, M, Amering, M, et al. (2014) Validation of the Family Inventory of Needs (FIN) for family caregivers in palliative care. Palliative Supportive Care 13, 485491.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, T, Molassiotis, A, Chung, BPM, et al. (2018) Unmet care needs of advanced cancer patients and their informal caregivers: A systematic review. BMC Palliative Care 17, 96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed