Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T07:36:13.147Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Knitting Together of Practices: Reflections on the Phenomenology of an Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation Healthcare Team

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2012

Maureen Dillon ,
Sandra Kippen  and
Julie Ellis
Maureen Dillon
Affiliation:
Mt Alvernia Mercy Hospital, Bendigo, Australia
Sandra Kippen*
Affiliation:
La Trobe University, Australia
Julie Ellis
Affiliation:
La Trobe University, Australia
*
Ms Sandra Kippen, Department of Public Health, La Trobe University, Bendigo, PO Box 199, Bendigo, Victoria 3550, Australia. E-mail: S.Kippen@latrobe.edu.
Get access

Abstract

The phenomenon of the interdisciplinary healthcare team is relatively new, and the experience of being part of such a team presents particular issues as members knit together their practices to form a cohesive whole. This article presents the results of a study of such a team. The participants were 6 health professionals involved in a rehabilitation program in a small not-for-profit hospital in a regional area. They participated in in-depth interviews to assist an exploration of the experience of belonging to such a team. The rationale for using this team was that it was generally recognised as a professional and cohesive group of people who were particularly successful at setting and achieving team goals. Phenomenological philosophy and methodology underpinned data collection and analysis, particularly that described by Colaizzi, which requires rigorous adherence to several steps in the analysts and returning to each participant with the findings for their final validation. The data analysis revealed themes relating to relationships with each other, with the team, and with the hierarchy. The essence of these experiences emerged as a notion of shared reality within the context of the team. Thus this article concludes that the essence of a successful rehabilitation team lies in its shared reality comprising such concepts as respect, shared wisdom and effective communication.

Type
Articles
Information
The Australian Journal of Rehabilitation Counselling , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , January 2004 , pp. 36 - 45
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Biondo-Wood, G.L., & Haber, J. (1994). Nursing research methods: Critical appraisal and utilisation. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby.Google Scholar
Burns, N., & Grove, S. (1997). The practice of nursing research: Conduct, critique and utilisation (3rd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders.Google Scholar
Colaizzi, P. (1978). Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. In Valle, R. & King, M. (Eds.), Existential-phenomenological alternatives for psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Crisp, R. (2000). Qualitative methods in rehabilitation research and their relevance to rehabilitation counselling practice. Australian Journal of Rehabilitation Counselling, 6(1), 12–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klimoski, R., & Mahommed, S. (1994). Team mental model: Construct or metaphor? Journal of Management, 20(2), 403–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, I., Chui, C., & Lee, S. (2001). Communication and shared reality: Implications for the psychological foundations of culture. Social Cognition, 19(3), 350–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, J., Higgins, E., & Choi, H. (2000). Development of strategic norms in groups. Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 18(1), 188–101.Google Scholar
Manen, M. v. (1984). Practising phenomenological writing. Phenomenology+Pedagogy, 2(1), 36–39.Google Scholar
Mickan, S., & Rodger, S. (2000). Characteristics of effective teams: A literature review. Australian Health Review, 23(3), 201–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Minichiello, V., Aroni, R., Timewell, E., & Alexander, L. (2000). In-depth interviewing (2nd ed.). Melbourne, Australia: Longman.Google Scholar
Parker, J. (1994). The lived experience of Native Americans with diabetes within a transcultural nursing perspective. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 6(1), 5–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Polkinghorne, . (1989). Phenomenological methods. In Valle, R. & Hailing, S. (Eds.), Existentialphenomenological perspectives in psychology: Exploring the breadth of human experience. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Pyett, P. (2003). Validation of qualitative research in the ‘Real World’. Qualitative Health Research, 13(8), 1170–1179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sellick, K. (1985). Interdisciplinary health teams: A question of attitude. The Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 3(1), 33–38.Google ScholarPubMed