Article contents
Impact of Surveillance Technique on Reported Rates of Surgical Site Infection
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 February 2015
Abstract
Surgical site infection (SSI) surveillance methods vary among infection preventionists. An online survey regarding SSI surveillance technique was administered to infection preventionists and linked to superficial and complex colon SSI rates. Higher superficial but not complex SSI rates were reported when more SSI surveillance techniques were used (P <.0001).
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2015;00(0): 1–3
- Type
- Concise Communications
- Information
- Copyright
- © 2015 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved
Footnotes
Presented in part: SHEA Spring 2014 Conference; Denver, Colorado; April 4, 2014.
References
1.
Horan, TC, Andrus, M, Dudeck, MA. CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. Am J Infect Control
2008;36:309–332.Google Scholar
2.
Anderson, DJ, Podgorny, K, Berrios-Torres, SI, et al. Strategies to prevent surgical site infections in acute care hospitals: 2014 update. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol
2014;35:S66–S88.Google Scholar
3.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. January 2015. Procedure-associated module: SSI. http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/PDFs/pscManual/9pscSSIcurrent.pdf.Google Scholar
4.
Department of Health and Human Services. Hospital inpatient prospective payment systems for acute care hospitals and the long-term care hospital prospective payment system and FY 2012 rates; hospitals' FTE resident caps for graduate medical education payment. 42 CFR Parts 412, 413, and 476; 2011. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2011-08-18/pdf/2011-19719.pdf.Google Scholar
5.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. State-based HAI prevention. http://www.cdc.gov/hai/stateplans/required-to-report-hai-NHSN.html#. Accessed Dec 10, 2014.Google Scholar
6.
Mannien, J, van den Hof, S, Brandt, C, Behnke, M, Wille, JC, Gastmeier, P. Comparison of the National Surgical Site Infection surveillance data between the Netherlands and Germany: PREZIES versus KISS. J Hosp Infect
2007;66:224–231.Google Scholar
7.
Barnes, S, Salemi, C, Fithian, D, et al. An enhanced benchmark for prosthetic joint replacement infection rates. Am J Infect Control
2006;34:669–672.Google Scholar
8.
Avato, JL, Lai, KK. Impact of postdischarge surveillance on surgical-site infection rates for coronary artery bypass procedures. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol
2002;23:364–367.Google Scholar
9.
Sands, K, Vineyard, G, Platt, R. Surgical site infections occurring after hospital discharge. J Infect Dis
1996;173:963–970.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.
Anderson, DJ, Chen, LF, Sexton, DJ, Kaye, KS. Complex surgical site infections and the devilish details of risk adjustment: important implications for public reporting. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol
2008;29:941–946.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.
Reese, S, Price, C, Knepper, B, Young, H. An evaluation of surgical site infection surveillance for colon surgery and hysterectomy in Colorado hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol (in press).Google Scholar
12.
Shiloach, M, Frencher, SK Jr., Steeger, JE, et al. Toward robust information: data quality and inter-rater reliability in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg
2010;210:6–16.Google Scholar
- 4
- Cited by