Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T05:09:13.284Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Challenges of Using Planetary Nebulae for Extragalactic Distances

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2016

L. Bottinelli
Affiliation:
1Observatoire de Paris, Section de Meudon, Arpèges/CNRS URA 1757, F-92195 Meudon Cedex, France 2Université Paris XI, F-91405 Orsay Cedex, France
L. Gouguenheim
Affiliation:
1Observatoire de Paris, Section de Meudon, Arpèges/CNRS URA 1757, F-92195 Meudon Cedex, France 2Université Paris XI, F-91405 Orsay Cedex, France
G. Paturel
Affiliation:
3Observatoire de Lyon, F-69561 Saint-Genis Laval Cedex, France
P. Teerikorpi
Affiliation:
4Tuorla Observatory, University of Turku, SF-21500 Piikkiö, Finland

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The planetary nebulae (hereafter PN) distance criterion (Ciardullo et al. 1989a) relies on the shape adopted for the luminosity function (hereafter LF) and its adequate fit to the observed data. Crucial hypothesis concerning the LF are its universal shape with an universal value of the absolute magnitude cut-off and concerning the sample, its completeness and the selection of the rejected data.

Because the completeness is achieved only in the bright part of the LF, the brighest PN play a crucial role in the distance determination and it is well known that the brightest objects (with intrinsic scatter) in a giant galaxy are brighter than in a dwarf galaxy. Thus more luminous galaxies are given smaller distances. Because giant galaxies are rare they are not seen at small distances; on the contrary, they are typically observed at large distances. This effect induces a progressive compression of the distance scale.

Type
II. Joint Discussions
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1995

References

Bottinelli, L., Gouguenheim, L., Paturel, G., Teerikorpi, P. 1991, A.A. 252, 550 Google Scholar
Ciardullo, R., Jacoby, G.H., Ford, H.C., Neill, J.D. 1989a, Ap.J. 339, 53 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciardullo, R., Jacoby, G.H., Ford, H.C., 1989b, Ap.J. 344, 715 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hui, X., Ford, H.C., Ciardullo, R., Jacoby, G.H. 1993, Ap.J. 414, 463 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacoby, G.H., Ciardullo, R., Ford, H.C. 1990, Ap.J. 356, 332 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMilian, R., Ciardullo, R., Jacoby, G.H. 1993, Ap.J. 416, 62 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peimbert, M. 1990, Rev. Prog. Phys. 53, 1559 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tammann, G. 1993, in Planetary Nebulae, IAU Symp. 155, eds Weinberger, R. and Acker, A. (Kluwer), p. 515 CrossRefGoogle Scholar