Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T23:14:13.666Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Root cause analysis of laboratory turnaround times for patients in the emergency department

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2015

Christopher M.B. Fernandes ,
Andrew Worster ,
Stephen Hill ,
Catherine McCallum  and
Kevin Eva
Christopher M.B. Fernandes*
Affiliation:
Emergency Medicine, Hamilton Health Sciences and McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont
Andrew Worster
Affiliation:
Emergency Medicine, Hamilton Health Sciences and McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont Department of Clinical Epidemiology And Biostatistics, McMaster University
Stephen Hill
Affiliation:
Hamilton Regional Laboratory Medicine Program, Hamilton, Ont Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University
Catherine McCallum
Affiliation:
Hamilton Regional Laboratory Medicine Program, Hamilton, Ont
Kevin Eva
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Epidemiology And Biostatistics, McMaster University
*
Emergency Medicine, Hamilton Health Sciences/McMaster University, 237 Barton St. E, Hamilton ON L8L 2X2; fax 905 528–0512, christopher_fernandes@sympatico.ca

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction:

Laboratory investigations are essential to patient care and are conducted routinely in emergency departments (EDs). This study reports the turnaround times at an academic, tertiary care ED, using root cause analysis to identify potential areas of improvement. Our objectives were to compare the laboratory turnaround times with established benchmarks and identify root causes for delays.

Methods:

Turnaround and process event times for a consecutive sample of hemoglobin and potassium measurements were recorded during an 8-day study period using synchronized time stamps. A log transformation (ln [minutes + 1]) was performed to normalize the time data, which were then compared with established benchmarks using one-sample t tests.

Results:

The turnaround time for hemoglobin was significantly less than the established benchmark (n = 140, t = –5.69, p < 0.001) and that of potassium was significantly greater (n = 121, t = 12.65, p < 0.001). The hemolysis rate was 5.8%, with 0.017% of samples needing recollection. Causes of delays included order-processing time, a high proportion (43%) of tests performed on patients who had been admitted but were still in the ED waiting for a bed, and excessive laboratory process times for potassium.

Conclusions:

The turnaround time for hemoglobin (18 min) met the established benchmark, but that for potassium (49 min) did not. Root causes for delay were order-processing time, excessive queue and instrument times for potassium and volume of tests for admitted patients. Further study of these identified causes of delays is required to see whether laboratory TATs can be reduced.

Keywords

laboratoryturnaround timesquality improvementroot cause analysis
Type
ED Administration • L’administration de la MU
Information
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , March 2004 , pp. 116 - 122
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2004

References

1.Kaplan, R, Norton, D.The strategy-focused organization. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation; 2001.Google Scholar
2.Joint Commission tackles emergency department overcrowding. ACEP News 2003;May:1–2.Google Scholar
3.Steindel, SJ, Howanitz, PJ.Physician satisfaction and emergency department laboratory test turnaround time. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2001;125:863–71.Google Scholar
4.Howanitz, PJ, Steindel, SJ, Cembrowski, GS, Long, TA.Emergency department stat test turnaround times. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1992;116:122–8.Google Scholar
5.Howanitz, PJ, Cembrowski, GS, Steindel, SJ, Long, TA.Physician goals and laboratory test turnaround times. A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 2763 clinicians and 722 institutions. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1993;117:22–8.Google Scholar
6.Howanitz, JH, Howanitz, PJ.Laboratory test results. Timeliness as a quality attribute and strategy. Am J Clin Pathol 2001; 116:311–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Wilson, PF, Dell, LD, Anderson, GF.Root cause analysis: a tool for total quality management. Milwaukee: American Society for Quality Control;1993. p. 59–72, 131–50.Google Scholar
8.Juran, JM.Juran on planning for quality by design. New York: The Free Press; 1988.Google Scholar
9.Beveridge, R, Clarke, B, Janes, L, Savage, N, Thompson, J, Dodd, G, et al. Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale: implementation guidelines. Can J Emerg Med 1999;1(3 Suppl). Available: http://www.caep.ca/002.policies/002–02.ctas.htmGoogle Scholar
10.Fernandes, CMB, Walker, R, Price, A, Marsden, J, Haley, L.Root cause analysis of laboratory delays to an emergency department. J Emerg Med 1997;15:735–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.The Leapfrog Group Web site [Internet]. Available: www.leapfroggroup.org (accessed 2004 Feb 6).Google Scholar