Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T04:25:35.268Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factors Affecting Adoption of Recommended Management Practices in Stocker Cattle Production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2015

Rachel J. Johnson ,
Damona Doye ,
David L. Lalman ,
Derrell S. Peel ,
Kellie Curry Raper  and
Chanjin Chung
Rachel J. Johnson
Affiliation:
Animal Products and Cost of Production Branch, Markets and Trade Economics Division, Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC
Damona Doye
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK
David L. Lalman
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK
Derrell S. Peel
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK
Kellie Curry Raper
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK
Chanjin Chung
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK
Get access

Abstract

Binary logit regression models were used to estimate factors affecting adoption of recommended management practices. Variables analyzed include aspects of farm structure, human capital, farm objectives, and production system employed by the producer. Results reveal that operation size and dependency upon income from the stocker operation, in particular, influence the adoption of recommended practices. Older producers and those pursuing a year-round production strategy were found to lag in adoption.

Keywords

beef productionlogitmanagement practicesstocker cattleQ12Q16
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 42 , Issue 1 , February 2010 , pp. 15 - 30
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amemiya, T. “Qualitative Response Models: A Survey.” Journal of Economic Literature 19,1(1981):1483-536.Google Scholar
Asteriou, D., and Hall, S.G. Applied Econometrics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.Google Scholar
Avent, R.K., Ward, C.E., and Lalman, D.L. “Market Valuation of Preconditioning Feeder Calves.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 36,1(2004):173-83.Google Scholar
Banerjee, S., Martin, S.W., Roberts, R.K., Larkin, S.L., Larson, J.A., Paxton, K.W., English, B.C., Marra, M.C., and Reeves, J.M. “A Binary Logit Estimation of Factors Affecting Adoption of GPS Guidance Systems by Cotton Producers.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 40,1(2008):345–55.Google Scholar
Caswell, M., Fuglie, K., Ingram, C., Jans, S., and Kascak, C. “Adoption of Agricultural Production Practices: Lessons Learned from the U.S. Department of Agriculture Area Studies Project.” Agricultural Economic Report No. 792. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, 2001.Google Scholar
Cox, D.R. “The Regression Analysis of Binary Sequences.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 20,2(1958):215–42.Google Scholar
Daberkow, S.G., and McBride, W.D. “Farm and Operator Characteristics Affecting the Awareness and Adoption of Precision Agriculture Technologies in the U.S.” Precision Agriculture 4,2(2003): 163-77.Google Scholar
Dexter, D.R., Cowman, G.L., Morgan, J.B., Clayton, R.P., Tatum, J.D., Sofos, J.N., Schmidt, G.R., Glock, R.D., and Smith, G.C. “Incidence of Injection-Site Blemishes in Beef Top Sirloin Butts.” Journal of Animal Science 72,4(1994): 824-27.Google Scholar
Diederen, P., Meijl, H. van, Wolters, A., and K. Bijak. “Innovation Adoption in Agriculture: Innovators, Early Adopters and Laggards.” Cahiers d'Economie et Sociologie Rurales 67,2(2003):29–50.Google Scholar
Doye, D. “Ranch Business Planning and Management.” Beef Cattle Manual. Lalman, D. and Doye, D., eds. 5th Ed. Stillwater, OK: Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service, Oklahoma State University, 2005.Google Scholar
El-Osta, H.S., and Morehart, M.J. “Technology Adoption and Its Impact on Production Performance of Dairy Operations.” Review of Agricultural Economics 22,2(2000):477-98.Google Scholar
Fernandez-Cornejo, J. “Off-Farm Income, Technology Adoption, and Farm Economic Performance.” Agricultural Economic Report No. 36. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, 2007.Google Scholar
Gillespie, J., Basarir, A., and Schupp, A. “Beef Producer Choice in Cattle Marketing.” Journal of Agribusiness 22,2(2004): 149-61.Google Scholar
Gillespie, J., Kim, S., and Paudel, K. “Why Don't Producers Adopt Best Management Practices? An Analysis of the Beef Cattle Industry.” Agricultural Economics 36,1(2007):89–102.Google Scholar
Green, G., Sunding, D., Zilberman, D., and D. Parker. “Explaining Irrigation Technology Choices: A Microparameter Approach.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78,4(1996): 1064-72.Google Scholar
Greene, W.H. Econometric Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Macmillan, Inc., 1990.Google Scholar
Greene, W.H. Econometric Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2002.Google Scholar
Griliches, Z. “Hybrid Corn: An Explanation in the Economics of Technological Change.” Econometrica 25,4(1957):501-22.Google Scholar
Hart, R.H., Samuel, M.J., Test, P.S., and Smith, M.A. “Cattle, Vegetation, and Economic Responses to Grazing Systems and Grazing Pressure.” Journal of Range Management 41,4(1988):282-86.Google Scholar
Harwood, J., Heifner, R., Coble, K., Perry, J., and Somwaru, A. “Managing Risk in Farming: Concepts, Research, Analysis.” Agricultural Economic Report No. 774. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, 1999.Google Scholar
Hensher, D.A., and Johnson, L.W. Applied Discrete Choice Modeling. London: Croom Helm, 1981.Google Scholar
Hoag, D.L., Ascough, J.C., and Frasier, W.M. “Farm Computer Adoption in the Great Plains.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 31,1(1999):57–67.Google Scholar
Johnson, R.J. “Adoption of Recommended Management Practices in Stocker Cattle Production.” Master's Thesis. Department of Agricultural Economics, Oklahoma State University, 2008.Google Scholar
Jones, R., Schroeder, T., Mintert, J., and F. Brazle. “The Impacts of Quality on Cash Fed Cattle Prices.” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics 24,2(1992): 149-62.Google Scholar
Judge, G.G., Griffiths, W.E., Hill, R. Carter, Lutkepohl, H., and Lee, T.C. The Theory and Practice of Econometrics. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1985.Google Scholar
Just, R.E., and Zilberman, D. “Stochastic Structure, Farm Size, and Technology Adoption in Developing Agriculture.” Oxford Economic Papers 35(1983):307-28.Google Scholar
Kennedy, P. A Guide to Econometrics. 4th Ed. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Lalman, D., and Doye, D. Beef Cattle Manual. 5th Ed. Stillwater, OK: Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service, Oklahoma State University, 2005.Google Scholar
Noussinov, M.A., and Leuthold, R.M. “Optimal Hedging Strategies for the U.S. Cattle Feeder.” Journal of Agribusiness 17,1(1999): 1–19.Google Scholar
Paudel, K., Gauthier, W., Westra, J., and L. Hall. “Factors Influencing and Steps Leading to the Adoption of Best Management Practices by Louisiana Dairy Farmers.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 40,1(2008): 203-22.Google Scholar
Peel, D.S. “Beef Cattle Growing and Backgrounding Programs.” The Veterinary Clinics: Food Animal Practice 19,2(2003):365-85.Google Scholar
Popp, M.P., Faminow, M.D., and Parseti, L.D. “Factors Affecting the Adoption of Value-Added Production on Cow-Calf Farms.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 31,1(1999):97–108.Google Scholar
Rahelizatovo, N.C., and Gillespie, J.M. “The Adoption of Best-Management Practices by Louisiana Dairy Producers.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 36,1 (2004):229-40.Google Scholar
Reuter, R., Highfill, G., and Lalman, D. “Implants and Their Use in Beef Cattle Production.” Beef Cattle Manual. Lalman, D. and Doye, D., eds. 5th Ed. Stillwater, OK: Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service, Oklahoma State University, 2005.Google Scholar
Rogers, E. Diffusion of Innovations. 3rd Ed. New York: Free Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Schmitz, T.G., Moss, C.B., and Schmitz, A. “Marketing Channels Compete for U.S. Stocker Cattle.” Journal of Agribusiness 21,2(2003):131-48.Google Scholar
Schroeder, T.C., Minert, J., Brazle, F., and Grunewald, O. “Factors Affecting Feeder Cattle Price Differentials.” Western Journal of Agricultural Economics 13,1(1988):71–81.Google Scholar
Selk, G.E., Reuter, R.R., and Kuhl, G.L. “Using Growth Promoting Implants in Stocker Cattle.” The Veterinary Clinics of North America. Food Animal Practice 22,2(2006):435-49.Google Scholar
Thrikawala, S., Weersink, A., Kachanoski, G., and G. Fox. “Economic Feasibility of Variable-Rate Technology for Nitrogen on Corn.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81(1999):914-92.Google Scholar
Traoré, N., Landry, R., and Amara, N. “On-Farm Adoption of Conservation Practices: The Role of Farm and Farmer Characteristics, Perceptions, and Health Hazards.” Land Economics 74,1(1998):114-27.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Services. Injection Practices in U.S. Feedlots. 2000. Internet site: http://nahms.aphis.usda.gov/feedlot/. (Accessed July 2008).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service. Cattle. Internet site: http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/nass/Catt//2000s/2008/Catt-02-01-2008.pdf. (Accessed July 2008).Google Scholar
Vestal, M.K. “Production Practices and Management Intensity of Oklahoma Cow-Calf Producers Across Income and Herd Size.” Master's Thesis. Department of Agricultural Economics, Oklahoma State University, 2005.Google Scholar
Ward, C.E., Vestal, M., Doye, D., and Lalman, D. “Factors Affecting Adoption of Cow-Calf Production Practices in Oklahoma.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 40,3(2008): 851-63.Google Scholar
Ward, C.E., Ratcliff, C.D., and Lalman, D.L. “Buyer Preferences for Feeder Calf Traits.” Division of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources. AGEC-602. Stillwater, OK: Oklahoma Cooperative Exptension Service Fact Sheet, Oklahoma State University, 2004.Google Scholar