Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T15:35:47.566Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Attachment states of mind among internationally adoptive and foster parents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2017

K. Lee Raby ,
Heather A. Yarger ,
Teresa Lind ,
R. Chris Fraley ,
Esther Leerkes  and
Mary Dozier
K. Lee Raby*
Affiliation:
University of Utah
Heather A. Yarger
Affiliation:
University of Delaware
Teresa Lind
Affiliation:
University of Delaware
R. Chris Fraley
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign
Esther Leerkes
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Mary Dozier
Affiliation:
University of Delaware
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: K. Lee Raby, Department of Psychology, University of Utah, 380 South 1530 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84112; E-mail: lee.raby@psych.utah.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The first aim of the current study was to examine the latent structure of attachment states of mind as assessed by the Adult Attachment Interview (AAI) among three groups of parents of children at risk for insecure attachments: parents who adopted internationally (N = 147), foster parents (N = 300), and parents living in poverty and involved with Child Protective Services (CPS; N = 284). Confirmatory factor analysis indicated the state of mind rating scales loaded on two factors reflecting adults’ preoccupied and dismissing states of mind. Taxometric analyses indicated the variation in adults’ preoccupied states of mind was more consistent with a dimensional than a categorical model, whereas results for dismissing states of mind were indeterminate. The second aim was to examine the degree to which the attachment states of mind of internationally adoptive and foster parents differ from those of poverty/CPS-referred parents and low-risk parents. After controlling for parental age, sex, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status, (a) internationally adoptive parents had lower scores on the dismissing dimension than the sample of community parents described by Haltigan, Leerkes, Supple, and Calkins (2014); (b) foster parents did not differ from community parents on either the dismissing or the preoccupied AAI dimension; and (c) both internationally adoptive and foster parents had lower scores on the preoccupied dimension than poverty/CPS-referred parents. Analyses using the traditional AAI categories provided convergent evidence that (a) internationally adoptive parents were more likely to be classified as having an autonomous state of mind than low-risk North American mothers based on Bakermans-Kranenburg and van IJzendoorn's (2009) meta-analytic estimates, (b) the rates of autonomous states of mind did not differ between foster and low-risk parents, and (c) both internationally adoptive and foster parents were less likely to be classified as having a preoccupied state of mind than poverty/CPS-referred parents.

Type
Special Issue Articles
Information
Development and Psychopathology , Volume 29 , Special Issue 2: Attachment in the Context of Atypical Caregiving: Harnessing Insights From a Developmental Psychopathology Perspective , May 2017 , pp. 365 - 378
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This research was supported by National Institute of Mental Health Grants R01MH052135, R01MH074374, and R01MH084135 (to M.D.) and National Institute for Child Health and Human Development Grant R01HD058578 (to E.L.). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. We thank the children and families who participated in the research and Deane Dozier for coding Adult Attachment Interviews. We also gratefully acknowledge the support of child protection and adoption agencies in Delaware; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Baltimore, Maryland; and New Jersey.

References

Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Babchishin, K. M., & Helmus, L. M. (in press). The influence of base rates on correlations: An evaluation of proposed alternative effect sizes with real-world data. Behavior Research Methods.Google Scholar
Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2009). The first 10,000 Adult Attachment Interviews: Distributions of adult attachment representations in clinical and non-clinical groups. Attachment and Human Development, 11, 223–263.Google Scholar
Ballen, N., Bernier, A., Moss, E., Tarabulsy, G. M., & St.-Laurent, D. (2010). Insecure attachment states of mind and atypical caregiving behavior among foster mothers. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 31, 118–125.Google Scholar
Barone, L., & Lionetti, F. (2012). Attachment and emotional understanding: A study on late-adopted preschoolers and their parents. Child: Care, Health, and Development, 38, 690–696.Google Scholar
Bernard, K., Dozier, M., Bick, J., & Gordon, M. K. (2015). Intervening to enhance cortisol regulation among children at risk for neglect: Results of a randomized clinical trial. Development and Psychopathology, 27, 829–841.Google Scholar
Bernard, K., Dozier, M., Bick, J., Lewis-Morrarty, E., Lindhiem, O., & Carlson, E. (2012). Enhancing attachment organization among maltreated children: Results of a randomized clinical trial. Child Development, 83, 623–636.Google Scholar
Bernier, A., Larose, S., Boivin, M., & Soucy, N. (2004). Attachment state of mind: Implications for adjustment to college. Journal of Adolescent Research, 19, 783–806.Google Scholar
Bick, J., & Dozier, M. (2013). The effectiveness of an attachment-based intervention in promoting foster mothers’ sensitivity toward foster infants. Infant Mental Health Journal, 34, 95–103.Google Scholar
Cassidy, J. (1994). Emotion regulation: Influences of attachment relationships. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59(2–3, Serial No. 240), 228–249.Google Scholar
Cohen, N. J., & Farnia, F. (2011). Social-emotional adjustment and attachment in children adopted from China: Processes and predictors of change. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35, 67–77.Google Scholar
Cyr, C., Euser, E. M., Bakemans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. (2010). Attachment security and disorganization in maltreating and high-risk families: A series of meta-analyses. Development and Psychopathology, 22, 87–108.Google Scholar
De Wolff, M., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (1997). Sensitivity and attachment: A meta-analysis on parental antecedents of infant attachment. Child Development, 68, 571–591.Google Scholar
Dozier, M., Peloso, E., Lindhiem, O., Gordon, M. K., Manni, M., Sepulveda, S., … Levine, S. (2006). Developing evidence-based interventions for foster children: An example of a randomized clinical trial with infants and toddlers. Journal of Social Issues, 62, 767–785.Google Scholar
Dozier, M., & Rutter, M. (2008). Challenges to the development of attachment relationships faced by young children in foster and adoptive care. In Cassidy, J. & Shaver, P. (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (2nd ed., pp. 698–717). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Dozier, M., Stovall, K., Albus, K. E., & Bates, B. (2001). Attachment for infants in foster care: The role of caregiver state of mind. Child Development, 72, 1467–1477.Google Scholar
Dykas, M. J., Woodhouse, S. S., Jones, J. D., & Cassidy, J. (2014). Attachment-related biases in adolescents’ memory. Child Development, 85, 2185–2201.Google Scholar
Fortuna, K., Roisman, G. I., Haydon, K. C., Groh, A. M., & Holland, A. S. (2011). Attachment states of mind and the quality of young adults’ sibling relationships. Developmental Psychology, 47, 1366–1373.Google Scholar
Fraley, R. C., & Roisman, G. I. (2014). Categories or dimensions? A taxometric analysis of the Adult Attachment Interview. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 79(3, Serial No. 314), 36–50.Google Scholar
Fraley, R. C., & Spieker, S. J. (2003). Are infant attachment patterns continuously or categorically distributed? A taxometric analysis of Strange Situation behavior. Developmental Psychology, 39, 387–404.Google Scholar
Haltigan, J. D., Leerkes, E. M., Supple, A. J., & Calkins, S. D. (2014). Infant negative affect and maternal interactive behavior during the still-face procedure: The moderating role of adult attachment states of mind. Attachment & Human Development, 16, 149–173.Google Scholar
Haltigan, J. D., Leerkes, E. M., Wong, M. S., Fortuna, K., Roisman, G. I., Supple, A. J., … Plamondon, A. (2014). Adult attachment states of mind: Measurement invariance across ethnicity and associations with maternal sensitivity. Child Development, 85, 1019–1035.Google Scholar
Haltigan, J. D., Roisman, G. I., & Haydon, K. C. (2014). The latent structure of the Adult Attachment Interview: Exploratory and confirmatory evidence. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 79(3, Serial No. 314), 15–35.Google Scholar
Haydon, K. C., Roisman, G. I., & Burt, K. B. (2012). In search of security: The latent structure of the Adult Attachment Interview revisited. Development and Psychopathology, 24, 589–606.Google Scholar
Haydon, K. C., Roisman, G. I., Marks, M. F., & Fraley, R. C. (2011). An empirically derived approach to the latent structure of the Adult Attachment Interview: Additional convergent and discriminant validity evidence. Attachment & Human Development, 13, 503–524.Google Scholar
Haydon, K. C., Roisman, G. I., Owen, M. T., Booth-LaForce, C., & Cox, M. J. (2014). Shared and distinctive antecedents of Adult Attachment Interview state-of-mind and inferred-experience dimensions. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 79(3, Serial No. 314), 108–125.Google Scholar
Hesse, E. (2008). The Adult Attachment Interview: Protocol, method of analysis, and empirical studies. In Cassidy, J. & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (2nd ed., pp. 552–598). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, H., Ivarsson, T., Wentzel-Larsen, T., Smith, L., & Moe, V. (2014). Foster parents’ states of mind with respect to attachment: Concordance with their foster children's attachment patterns at 2 and 3 years of age. Infant Mental Health Journal, 35, 297–308.Google Scholar
Juffer, F., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2005). The importance of parenting in the development of disorganized attachment: Evidence from a preventive intervention study in adoptive families. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 263–274.Google Scholar
Kobak, R. R., Cole, H. E., Ferenz-Gillies, R., Fleming, W. S., & Gamble, W. (1993). Attachment and emotion regulation during mother-teen problem solving: A control theory analysis. Child Development, 64, 231–245.Google Scholar
Lang, K., Bovenschen, I., Gabler, S., Zimmermann, J., Nowacki, K., Kliewer, J., & Spangler, G. (2016). Foster children's attachment security in the first year after placement: A longitudinal study of predictors. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 36, 269–280.Google Scholar
Larose, S., & Bernier, A. (2001). Social support processes: Mediators of attachment state of mind and adjustment in late adolescence. Attachment and Human Development, 3, 96–120.Google Scholar
Levy-Shiff, R., Goldshmidt, I., & Har-Even, D. (1991). Transition to parenthood in adoptive families. Developmental Psychology, 27, 131–140.Google Scholar
Lewis-Morrarty, E., Dozier, M., Bernard, K., Terraciano, S., & Moore, S. (2012). Cognitive flexibility and theory of mind outcomes among foster children: Preschool follow-up results of a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Adolescent Health, 52, S17–S22.Google Scholar
Lind, T., Bernard, K., Ross, E., & Dozier, M. (2014). Intervention effects on negative affect of CPS-referred children: Results of a randomized clinical trial. Child Abuse and Neglect, 38, 1459–1467.Google Scholar
Lind, T., Raby, K. L., Caron, E. B., Roben, C. K. P., & Dozier, M. (2017). Enhancing executive functioning among toddlers in foster care with an attachment-based intervention. Development and Psychopathology, 29, 575–586.Google Scholar
Lionetti, F. (2014). What promotes secure attachment in early adoption? The protective roles of infants’ temperament and adoptive parents’ attachment. Attachment & Human Development, 16, 573–589.Google Scholar
Lionetti, F., Pastore, M., & Barone, L. (2015). Attachment in institutionalized children: A review and meta-analysis. Child Abuse and Neglect, 42, 135–145.Google Scholar
MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, 84–99.Google Scholar
Macfie, J., Swan, S. A., Fitzpatrick, K. L., Watkins, C. D., & Rivas, E. M. (2014). Mothers with borderline personality and their young children: Adult attachment interviews, mother–child interactions, and children's narrative representations. Development and Psychopathology, 26, 539–551.Google Scholar
Main, M. (1990). Cross-cultural studies of attachment organization: Recent studies, changing methodologies, and the concept of conditional strategies. Human Development, 33, 48–61.Google Scholar
Main, M., & Goldwyn, R. (1998). Adult Attachment Scoring and Classification System. Unpublished manuscript, University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar
Main, M., Hesse, E., & Hesse, S. (2011). Attachment theory and research: Overview with suggested applications to child custody. Family Court Review, 49, 426–463.Google Scholar
Main, M., Kaplan, N., & Cassidy, J. (1985). Security in infancy, childhood, and adulthood: A move to the level of representation. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 50(1–2, Serial No. 209), 66–104.Google Scholar
Martin, J., Bureau, J.-F., Lafontaine, M.-F., Cloutier, P. F., Hsiao, C., Pallanca, D., & Meinz, P. (2017). Preoccupied but not dismissing attachment states of mind are associated with nonsuicidal self-injury. Development and Psychopathology, 29, 379–388.Google Scholar
McGrath, R. E., & Meyer, G. J. (2006). When effect sizes disagree: The case of r and d. Psychological Methods, 11, 386–401.Google ScholarPubMed
McGue, M., Keyes, M., Sharma, A., Elkins, I., Legrand, L., Johnson, W., & Iacono, W. G. (2007). The environments of adopted and non-adopted youth: Evidence on range restriction from the Sibling Interaction and Behavior Study (SIBS). Behavior Genetics, 37, 449–462.Google Scholar
Meehl, P. E. (1973). MAXCOV-HITMAX: A taxonomic search method for loose genetic syndromes. In Meehl, P. E. (Ed.), Psychodiagnosis: Selected papers (pp. 200–224). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Meehl, P. E., & Yonce, L. J. (1994). Taxometric analysis: I. Detecting taxonicity with two quantitative indicators using means above and below a sliding cut (MAMBAC procedure). Psychological Reports, 74, 1059–1274.Google Scholar
Meehl, P. E., & Yonce, L. J. (1996). Taxometric analysis: II. Detecting taxonicity using covariance of two quantitative indicators in successive intervals of a third indicator (MAXCOV procedure). Psychological Reports, 78, 1091–1227.Google Scholar
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2015). Mplus user's guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles: Author.Google Scholar
Pace, C. S., Santona, A., Zavattini, G. C., & Di Folco, S. (2015). Attachment states of mind and couple relationships in couples seeking to adopt. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24, 1–13.Google Scholar
Pace, C. S., Zavattini, G. C., & D'Alessio, M. (2012). Continuity and discontinuity of attachment patterns: A short-term longitudinal pilot study using a sample of late-adopted children and their adoptive mothers. Attachment and Human Development, 14, 45–61.Google Scholar
Raby, K. L., Labella, M. H., Martin, J., Carlson, E. A., & Roisman, G. I. (2017). Childhood abuse and neglect and insecure attachment states of mind in adulthood: Prospective, longitudinal evidence from a high-risk sample. Development and Psychopathology, 29, 347–363.Google Scholar
Roisman, G. I., Fraley, R. C., & Belsky, J. (2007). A taxometric study of the Adult Attachment Interview. Developmental Psychology, 43, 675–686.Google Scholar
Roisman, G. I., Rogosch, F. A., Cicchetti, D., Groh, A. M., Haltigan, J. D., Haydon, K. C., Holland, A. S., & Steele, R. D. (2017). Attachment states of mind and inferred childhood experiences in maltreated and comparison adolescents from low-income families. Development and Psychopathology, 29, 337–345.Google Scholar
Ruscio, J., Haslam, N., & Ruscio, A. M. (2006). Introduction to the taxometric method: A practical guide. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ruscio, J., Ruscio, A. M., & Meron, M. (2007). Applying the bootstrap to taxometric analysis: Generating empirical sampling distributions to help interpret results. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 349–386.Google Scholar
Ruscio, J., Walters, G. D., Marcus, D. K., & Kaczetow, W. (2010). Comparing the relative fit of categorical and dimensional latent variable models using consistency tests. Psychological Assessment, 22, 5–21.Google Scholar
Rutter, M. (2000). Psychosocial influences: Critiques, findings, and research needs. Development and Psychopathology, 12, 375–405.Google Scholar
Santona, A., & Zavattini, G. C. (2005). Partnering and parenting expectations in adoptive couples. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 20, 309–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharf, M., Mayseless, O., & Kivenson-Barne, I. (2012). Intergenerational concordance in Adult Attachment Interviews with mothers, fathers, and adolescent sons and subsequent adjustment of sons to military service. Attachment & Human Development, 14, 367–390.Google Scholar
Shlafer, R. J., Raby, K. L., Lawler, J. M., Hesemeyer, P. S., & Roisman, G. I. (2015). Longitudinal associations between adult attachment states of mind and parenting quality. Attachment & Human Development, 17, 83–95.Google Scholar
Steele, H., & Steele, M. (2008). Clinical applications of the Adult Attachment Interview. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Stovall-McClough, K. C., & Dozier, M. (2004). Forming attachments in foster care: Infant attachment behaviors during the first 2 months of placement. Development and Psychopathology, 16, 253–271.Google Scholar
Van den Dries, L., Juffer, F., van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Bakermans-Kranenburg, M.J. (2009). Fostering security? A meta-analysis of attachment in adopted children. Children and Youth Services Review, 31, 410–421.Google Scholar
Van Londen-Barentsen, W. M. (2002). Attachment in adoptive families: Intergenerational transmission and disorganized attachment (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Utrecht).Google Scholar
Verhage, M. L., Schuengel, C., Madigan, S., Fearon, R. M. P., Oosterman, M., Cassibba, R., … van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2016). Narrowing the transmission gap: A synthesis of three decades of research on intergenerational transmission of attachment. Psychological Bulletin, 142, 337–366.Google Scholar
Waller, N. G., & Meehl, P. E. (1998). Multivariate taxometric procedures: Distinguishing types from continua. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Whipple, N., Bernier, A., & Mageau, G. A. (2011). A dimensional approach to maternal attachment state of mind: Relations to maternal sensitivity and maternal autonomy support. Developmental Psychology, 47, 396–403.Google Scholar