Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T12:07:31.524Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Ship Domain – A Criterion of Navigational Safety Assessment in an Open Sea Area

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2008

Zbigniew Pietrzykowski  and
Janusz Uriasz
Zbigniew Pietrzykowski*
Affiliation:
(Maritime University of Szczecin)
Janusz Uriasz
Affiliation:
(Maritime University of Szczecin)
*
(Email: z.pietrzykowski@am.szczecin.pl)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

One of the basic tasks in shipping is to ensure safe navigation of vessels. The concept of the ship domain is of major importance in the assessment of a navigational situation and the avoidance of ship collisions. It is difficult to determine a ship domain as its shape and size depend on a number of factors. One question to be answered before the determination of the ship domain is which method to use: statistical, analytic, or expert method using artificial intelligence tools; other questions are connected with domain interpretation. The authors have analyzed the ship domain as a criterion for the assessment of ship navigational safety in an encounter situation in the open sea. The research results are used to answer some of the questions.

Part 2 includes definitions of the ship domain and ship fuzzy domain. Part 3, in turn, presents methods of their determination as well as relevant questions. The results of the authors' research, described in Part 4, make up a basis for the determination of the domain and ship fuzzy domain. These have been determined with the so-called dynamic domains as a point of departure. The criteria of ship domain and closest point of approach are compared and discussed. Encounters of various size ships are considered in Part 5. The research and its results are described. Both ship domains and ship fuzzy domains of encountering ships are analyzed. Then, conclusions have been formulated in relation to the effect of the sizes of encountering ships on the shapes and sizes of their domains. Final conclusions are given in Part 6.

Keywords

navigational safetyship domainopen sea area
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 62 , Issue 1 , January 2009 , pp. 93 - 108
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Davis, P., Dove, M., Stockel, C., (1980), A Computer Simulation of Marine Traffic Using Domains and Arenas, The Journal of Navigation, 33, 215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuji, Y., Tanaka, K., (1971). Traffic capacity, The Journal of Navigation, 24, 543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, H., Patraiko, D., (2007), Improving navigational safety, Seaways, July 2007.Google Scholar
Goodwin, E. M., (1975), A statistical study of ship domains. The Journal of Navigation, 28, 328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, M., (1986). Modelling the decision process in computer simulation of ship navigation. The Journal of Navigation, 39, 32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pietrzykowski, Z., (1999). Ship fuzzy domain in assessment of navigational safety in restricted areas, Proc. of 3rd Navigational Symposium, Gdynia, I, 253 (in Polish).Google Scholar
Pietrzykowski, Z., (2004). Modeling of decision processes in sea-going ship movement control, Maritime University of Szczecin, Series Study No 43, Szczecin, (in Polish).Google Scholar
Pietrzykowski, Z., Uriasz, J., (2004), The Ship Domain in a Deep-sea Area, Proc. of Computer and Information Technology Applications in the Maritime Industries COMPIT 2004, Siguenza, 204.Google Scholar
Pietrzykowski, Z., Uriasz, J., (2005), Methods and criteria of navigational situation assessment in an open sea area, Proc. of 4 thInternational Conference Computer and Information Technology Applications in the Maritime Industries COMPIT 2005, Hamburg, 500.Google Scholar
Pietrzykowski, Z., Uriasz, J., (2006), Ship domain in navigational situation assessment in an open sea area, Proc. of 5 thInternational Conference Computer and Information Technology Applications in the Maritime Industries COMPIT 2006, Oud Poelgeest, Leiden/Netherlands, 237.Google Scholar
Smierzchalski, R., Weintrit, A., (1999). Domains of navigational objects as an aid to route planing in collision situation at sea. In: Proc. of 3rd Navigational Symposium, Gdynia, I, 265, (in Polish).Google Scholar
Wawruch, R., (1998), Vessel traffic control systems, Scientific Papers Gdynia Maritime University, 6, 28 (in Polish).Google Scholar
Zadeh, L. A., Fuzzy sets (1965), Information and control, No 8, 338.Google Scholar
Zhao, J., Wu, Z., Wang, F., (1993). Comments of ship domains. The Journal of Navigation, 46, 422.Google Scholar
Zhu, X., Xu, H., Lin, J., (2001), Domain and its model based on neural networks, The Journal of Navigation, 54, 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar