Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T17:05:03.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Facilitation of semantic comprehension at the one-word stage of language development*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Janet J. Fritz  and
George J. Suci
Janet J. Fritz
Affiliation:
Colorado State University
George J. Suci
Affiliation:
Cornell University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Early in the development of language, children must learn to relate the language they hear to objects and events in their immediate perceptual environment. Gilmore (1977) found that infants at the two-word stage of language production and, under certain conditions, some infants at the one-word stage as well, seemed to map a simple sentence (e.g. The bunny hugs the kitty) onto a visual event (which, for example, showed a puppet rabbit hugging a puppet cat). In Gilmore's experiment, a habituation series of trials, presenting either appropriate pairings of a variety of sentences with visual events (as in the above example), or inappropriate pairings (e.g. The kitty hugs the bunny, when, in fact, the reverse was true) were presented repeatedly until subjects habituated. A test series of trials followed with an inappropriate/appropriate pairing, whichever was not used during habituation. Two-word subjects seemed to discriminate between the test and habituation pairings in either case. One-word subjects seemed to discrimi- nate only when they received the appropriate pairing during habituation and the inappropriate during the test.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , February 1982 , pp. 31 - 39
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Benedict, H. (1975). The role of repetition in early language comprehension. Paper presented to the Society for Research in Child Development, Denver.Google Scholar
DePaulo, B. & Bonvillian, J. (1975). The effect on language development of the special characteristics of speech addressed to children. Unpublished paper, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Gilmore, L. (1977). The responses of preverbal and early verbal infants to differences in the narration of visual events. Unpublished dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Glazner, P. & Dodd, D. (1975). Developmental changes in the language spoken to children. Paper presented to the Society for Research in Child Development, Denver.Google Scholar
Newport, E. (1977). Motherese: the speech of mothers to young children. In Castellan, N. J., Pisoni, D. B. & Potts, G. R.. (eds), Cognitive Theory, Vol. 2. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Robertson, S. (1977). Thought and language in infancy: the perception of visual action events. Unpublished dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Robertson, S. & Suci, G. (1980). Event perception by children in the early stages of language production. ChDev 51. 89–96.Google ScholarPubMed
Winer, B. (1971). Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar