Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T17:09:29.834Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Copernicus's Publication Strategy in the Contexts of Imperial and Papal Censorship and of Warmian Diplomatic Precedents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 May 2016

Geoffrey Blumenthal
Geoffrey Blumenthal*
Affiliation:
University of Bristol E-mail: gb0859@bristol.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Argument

The main thesis of this paper is that Copernicus's avoidance of all admission that scripture was contravened in De revolutionibus and his composition of its new Preface in 1542, as well as the non-publication of Rheticus's Treatise on Holy Scripture and the Motion of the Earth, were influenced by the early information they received on the failure of the 1541 Regensburg Protestant-Catholic colloquy, among the major consequences of which were significant increases in the problems concerning publishing works which contravened scripture. This is supported by examining Rheticus's first letter to Paul Eber in conjunction with the documents on the Regensburg colloquy and on censorship in Nuremberg, as well as with the existing literature on Copernicus and his context. In view of the main thesis, Copernicus's apparent dedication of the work to the Pope merits additional explanation, and the second thesis is that components of explanations for several aspects of those parts of the Preface that relate to the Papacy and to theologians can be provided via comparisons with previous diplomacy between Warmia and the Papacy which occurred or was being referred to during Copernicus's time. This is supported by examining these parts of the Preface in the light of a selection of the relevant documents.

Type
Research Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , June 2016 , pp. 151 - 178
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Apelt, Ernst. 1852. Die Reformation der Sternkunde. Jena: Mauke.Google Scholar
Arbusow, Leonid. 1900. Liv-, est- und kurländisches Urkundenbuch, 2nd series, vol. 1. Riga: Deubner.Google Scholar
Augustijn, Cornelis. 1993. “The Quest of Reformatio: The Diet of Regensburg 1541 as a Turning-Point.” In Archiv für Reformationsgeschichte, Sonderband: Die Reformation in Deuschland und Europa - Interpretationen und Debatten, edited by Guggisberg, Hans and Krodel, Gottfried, 64–80. Gütersloher Verlagshaus.Google Scholar
Beckmann, Franz. 1861–3. “Zur Geschichte des Kopernikanischen Systems,” Zeitschrift für die Geschichte und Altertumskunde Ermlands, 2:227–267, 320-58, 659-69.Google Scholar
Biliński, Bronisław. 1973. Najstarszy Życiorys Mikołaja Kopernika z Roku 1588 pióra Bernardina Baldiego [The earliest biography of Copernicus dated 1588 written by Bernardino Baldi]. Warsaw: Ossolineum.Google Scholar
Birkenmajer, Aleksander. [1953]1972. “Le Premier Système Héliocentrique Imaginé par Nicolas Copernic.” In Études d'Histoire des Sciences en Pologne, Studia Copernicana IV, edited by Birkenmajer, Aleksander, 583–588. Warsaw: Ossolineum.Google Scholar
Birkenmajer, Ludwik Antoni. 1901. “Marco Beneventano, Kopernik, Wapowski a najstarsza karta geograficzna Polski” [Marco Beneventano, Copernicus, Wapowski and the oldest map of Poland]. Rozprawy Akademii Umiejętności, Wydz. Mat. Przyr. Ser. A. 41:134–220.Google Scholar
Biskup, Marian. 1973. Regesta Copernicana. Wrocław: Polska Academia Nauk; Zakład Historii Nauki i Techniki.Google Scholar
Blumenstok, Alfred. 1890. Der päpstliche Schutz im Mittelalter. Innsbruck: Wagner.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, Geoffrey. 2013. “Diplomacy, Patronage and the Preface to De revolutionibus.” Journal for the History of Astronomy 44:75–92.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, Geoffrey. 2014. “Copernicus's Development in Context: Politics, Astrology, Cosmology and a Prince-Bishopric.” Science in Context 27 (1):1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borawska, Teresa. 1972. “Bernard Sculteti jako rzecznik interesów Warmińskich w Rzymie na przełomie XV i XVI Wieku” [Bernard Sculteti as a spokesman for the interests of Warmia in Rome at the turn of the fifteenth and sixteenth century]. Komunikaty Mazursko-Warmińskie 2–3:343–360.Google Scholar
Burmeister, Karl Heinz. 1968. Georg Joachim Rhetikus, 1514-1574, Eine Bio-Bibliographie, 3 vols. Wiesbaden: Pressler.Google Scholar
Burmeister, Karl Heinz. 1970b. “Rheticus's Earliest Extant Letter to Paul Eber: Commentary.” Isis 61:385–6.Google Scholar
Copernicus, Nicolaus. [1543]1978. On the Revolutions. Translated by Rosen, Edward. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Copernicus, Nicolaus. [1543]1995. On the Revolutions. Translated by Wallis, Charles. Amherst: Prometheus.Google Scholar
Creasman, Allyson. 2012. Censorship and Civic Order in Reformation Germany, 1517-1648. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Deusterwald, Paul, Prange, Georg, Reich, Felix, and Stockfisch, Balthasar. [Written 1489-1512], 1889. “ Memoriale Domini Lucae Episcope Warmiensis.” In Scriptores Rerum Warmiensium II, edited by Peter Woelky, Carl, 1–171. Braunsberg: Eduard Peter.Google Scholar
Edwards, Mark. 2005. Printing, Propaganda, and Martin Luther. Minneapolis: Fortress.Google Scholar
Eichhorn, Anton. 1866. “Die Prälaten des Ermländischen Domkapitels.” Zeitschrift für die Geschichte und Altertumskunde Ermlands 3:305–397 and 529-643.Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, Ulrich. 1970. Die kaiserliche Aufsicht über Buchdruck, Buchhandel und Presse in Heiligen Römischen Reich Deutscher Nation (1496-1806). Karlsruhe: Müller.Google Scholar
Ewald, Albert Ludwig. 1872–86. Die Eroberung Preussens durch die Deutschen, 4 vols. Halle: Waisenhaus.Google Scholar
Finocchiaro, Maurice. 1989. The Galileo Affair: A Documentary History. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Fletcher, Stella. 1991. “Venetian Cardinals at the Papal Court during the Pontificates of Sixtus IV and Innocent VIII: 1471-1492.” PhD diss., University of Warwick.Google Scholar
Forstreuter, Kurt. 1951. Vom Ordensstaat zum Fürstentum. Kitzingen: Holzner.Google Scholar
Forstreuter, Kurt. 1973. “Dietrich von Reden und Nikolaus von Schönberg.” In Nicolaus Copernicus zum 500 Geburtstag, edited by Kaulbach, Friedrich, Bargenda, Udo, and Blühdorn, Jürgen, 235–258. Cologne: Böhlau.Google Scholar
Foscarini, Paolo. [1615]1991. “Lettera sopra l'opinione de’ Pittagoirici.” In Galileo, Bellarmine and the Bible, edited and translated by Blackwell, Richard, 217–51. Notre Dame IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Freytag, Hermann. 1900. “Preussen und das Deutsche Nationalhospitz St. Maria dell'Anima in Rom.” Zeitschrift des Westpreussischen Geschichtsvereins 42:70–87.Google Scholar
Galilei, Galileo. [1632]1953. Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems. Translated by Drake, Stillman, New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Ganzer, Klaus, and Mühlen, Karl-Heinz zur. 2000. Akten der deutschen Reichsreligionsgespräche im 16. Jahrhundert: Erster Band - Das Hagenauer Religionsgespräch 1540, 2 vols. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Ganzer, Klaus, and Mühlen, Karl-Heinz zur. 2002. Akten der deutschen Reichsreligionsgespräche im 16. Jahrhundert: Zweiter Band - Das Wormser Religionsgespräch 1540-41, 2 vols. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Ganzer, Klaus, Mühlen, Karl-Heinz zur, Jäger, Norbert, Schultheis, Saskia and Stoll, Christoph. 2007. Akten der deutschen Reichsreligionsgespräche im 16. Jahrhundert: Dritter Band - Das Regensburger Religionsgespräch 1541, 2 vols. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Gess, Felician. 1985. Akten und Briefe zur Kirchenpolitik Herzog Georgs von Sachsen. Leipzig: Zentralantiquariat.Google Scholar
Gingerich, Owen. 1993. The Eye of Heaven: Ptolemy, Copernicus, Kepler. New York: American Institute of Physics.Google Scholar
Gingerich, Owen, and MacLachlan, James. 2004. Nicolaus Copernicus: Making the Earth a Planet. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goddu, André. 2006. “Reflections on the Origin of Copernicus's Cosmology.” Journal for the History of Astronomy 37:37–53.Google Scholar
Goddu, André. 2010. Copernicus and the Aristotelian Tradition. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Bernard. 2002. “Copernicus and the Origin of his Heliocentric System.” Journal for the History of Astronomy 33:219–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Górski, Karol. 1973b. Łukasz Watzenrode Życie i Działalność Polityczna (1447-1512): Studia Copernicana X [The Life and Political Activity of Lucas Watzenrode]. Wrocław: Zakład narodowy im. Ossolińskich - Wydaw. Polskiej Akademii Nauk.Google Scholar
Górski, Karol. 1976. Communitas Princeps Corona Regni. Warsaw: Państwo Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar
Granada, Miguel, and Tessicini, Dario. 2005. “Copernicus and Fracastoro: The Dedicatory Letters to Pope Paul III, the History of Astronomy, and the Quest for Patronage.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 26:431–76.Google Scholar
Grimm, Harold. 1978. Lazarus Spengler: A Lay Leader of the Reformation. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Hennes, Johann. 1845. Codex Diplomaticus Ordinis Sanctae Mariae Theutonicorum: Urkundenbuch des Deustchen Ordens, Part 1. Mainz: Franz Kirchheim.Google Scholar
Hergang, Karl Theodor. 1858. Das Religions-Gespräch zu Regensburg i. f. 1541 und das Regensburger Buch. Kassel: Fischer.Google Scholar
Hipler, Franz. 1873. Spicilegium Copernicanum. Braunsberg: Eduard Peter.Google Scholar
Hipler, Franz. 1874. “Analecta Warmiensia.” Zeitschrift für die Geschichte und Altertumskunde Ermlands 5:316–488.Google Scholar
Hooykaas, Reijer. 1984. G.J. Rheticus’ Treatise on Holy Scripture and the Motion of the Earth. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing.Google Scholar
Jänig, Karl, ed. 1875. Liber Confraternitatis B. Marie de Anima Teutonicorum de Urbe. RomeEx typographia polyglotta S. C. de Propaganda Fide.Google Scholar
Jedin, Hubert. 1957. A History of the Council of Trent, vol. 1: The Struggle for the Council. London: Thomas Nelson.Google Scholar
Joachim, Erich, and Hubatsch, Walther. 1948a. Regesta Historico-Diplomatica Ordinis S Mariae Theutonicorum 1198-1525. Pars II: Regesten der Pergament-Urkunden aus der Zeit des Deutschen Ordens. Göttingen: Vandenhoek und Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Joachim, Erich, and Hubatsch, Walther. 1948b. Regesta Historico-Diplomatica Ordinis S Mariae Theutonicorum 1198-1525. Pars I: Regesten zum Ordensbriefen, vol. 1: 1198-1432. Göttingen: Vandenhoek und Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Joachim, Erich, and Hubatsch, Walther. 1950. Regesta Historico-Diplomatica Ordinis S. Mariae Theutonicorum 1198-1525. Pars I: Regesten zum Ordensbriefen, vol. 2: 1455-1510. Göttingen: Vandenhoek und Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Joachim, Erich, and Hubatsch, Walther. 1973. Regesta Historico-Diplomatica Ordinis S Mariae Theutonicorum 1198-1525. Pars I: Regesten zum Ordensbriefen, vol. 3: 1511-1525. Göttingen: Vandenhoek und Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Kapp, Friedrich. 1886. Geschichte des deutschen Buchhandels. 1: Bis in das siebzehnte Jahrhundert. Leipzig: Börsenverein der Deutschen Buchändler.Google Scholar
Köhler, Hans-Joachim. 1986. “The Flugschriften and Their Importance in Religious Debate: A Quantitative Approach.” In ‘Astrologi hallucinati’: Stars and the End of the World in Luther's Time, edited by Zambelli, Paola, 153–175. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kolberg, Josef. 1903. “Ermland im Kriege des Jahres 1520.” Zeitschrift für die Geschichte und Altertumskunde Ermlands 15:210–390 and 481-578.Google Scholar
Kraai, Jesse. 2003. Rheticus's Heliocentric Providence. www.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/archiv/3254, last accessed February 8, 2016.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas. 1957. The Copernican Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kühne, Andreas. 1994. Nicolaus Copernicus Gesamtausgabe, vol. VI/I: Briefe. Texte und Übersetzungen. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Kühne, Andreas, and Kirschner, Stefan. 2004. Nicolaus Copernicus Gesamtausgabe, vol. IX: Die Copernicus-Biographien des 16. bis 18. Jahrhunderts. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Lerner, Michel-Pierre. 2004. “Copernic suspendu et corrigé: sur deux décrets de la congregation romaine de l'Index.” Galilaeana 1:21–89.Google Scholar
Lerner, Michel-Pierre and Segonds, Alain-Philippe. 2008, “Sur l'Ad lectorem du De Revolutionibus orbium caelestium.” Galileana 5:113–48.Google Scholar
Lerner, Michel-Pierre, Segonds, Alain-Philippe, and Verdet, Jean-Pierre, eds. 2015. Nicolas Copernic: De revolutionibus orbium coelestium. Paris: Les belles lettres.Google Scholar
Lewicki, Anatolii. 1891. Codex Epistolaris Saeculi Decimi Quinti, t. III. Kraków: Nakładem Akademii Umiejętności Krakówskiej.Google Scholar
Maas, Clifford. 1981. The German Community in Renaissance Rome. Rome: Herder.Google Scholar
Marzi, Demetrio. 1896. La questione della Riforma del Calendario nel Quinto Concilio Lateranense 925 1512-1517. Florence: Carnesecchi.Google Scholar
Maschke, Erich. 1979. Der Peterspfennig in Polen und dem Deutschen Orden. Sigmaringen: Jan Thorbecke.Google Scholar
Matheson, Peter. 1972. Cardinal Contarini at Regensburg. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Melanchthon, Phillip. 1837. Corpus reformatorum, vol. 4, edited by Bretschneider, Carl. Halle: Schwetscher.Google Scholar
Müller, Arnd. 1959. “Zensurpolitik in der Reichsstadt Nürnberg.” Mitteilungen des Vereins für die Geschichte Nürnbergs 49:66–169.Google Scholar
Nowakowska, Natalia. 2007. Church, State and Dynasty in Renaissance Poland: The Career of Cardinal Fryderyk Jagiellon 1468-1503. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Pastor, Ludwig. 1880. “Die Correspondenz des Cardinals Contarini während seiner deutschen Legation (1541)”, Historisches Jahrbuch der Görres-Gesellschaft 1:321–392 and 473-500.Google Scholar
Pastor, Ludwig. 1908. The History of the Popes, from the Close of the Middle Ages, vols. VII-VIII. Translated by Kerr, Ralph. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Phillipi, Rudolph. 1882. Preussisches Urkundenbuch: Politische Abteilung, vol. 1, part 1. Aalen: Scientia.Google Scholar
Prowe, Leopold. 1883. Nicolaus Coppernicus. Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar
Putnam, George. 1906. The Censorship of the Church of Rome and Its Influence upon the Production and Distribution of Literature, vol. 1. New York: Putnam.Google Scholar
Reh, Paul. 1896. “Das Verhältnis des Deutschen Ordens zu den Preussischen Bischöfen im 13. Jahrhundert.” Zeitschrift des Westpreussischen Geschichtsvereins 35:35–147.Google Scholar
Röhrich, Viktor. 1897. “Ermland im dreizehnjährigen Städtekriege.” Zeitschrift für die Geschichte und Altertumskunde Ermlands 11:161–260 and 337-470.Google Scholar
Rosen, Edward. 1970. “Rheticus's Earliest Extant Letter to Paul Eber.” Isis 61:384.Google Scholar
Rosen, Edward. 1975. “Was Copernicus's Revolutions Approved by the Pope?” Journal of the History of Ideas 36:531–542.Google Scholar
Sarnowsky, Jürgen. 2001. “Die Quellen zur Geschichte des Deutschen Ordens in Preussen.” In Edition Deutschsprachiger Quellen aus dem Ostseeraum (14.-16. Jahrhundert), edited by Thumser, Matthias, Tandecki, Janusz, and Heckmann, Dieter, 171–199. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika.Google Scholar
Schmauch, Hans. 1933a. “Der Streit um die Wahl des Ermländischen Bischofs Lucas Watzenrode.” Altpreussische Forschungen 65–101.Google Scholar
Schmauch, Hans. 1933b. “Der Kampf zwischen dem Ermländischen Bischof Nikolaus von Tüngen und Polen.” Zeitschrift für die Geschichte und Altertumskunde Ermlands 25:69–136.Google Scholar
Schmauch, Hans. 1966. “Die kirchenrechtliche Stellung der Diözese Ermlands.” Zeitschrift für die Geschichte und Altertumskunde Ermlands 30:465–495.Google Scholar
Schmidlin, Joseph. 1906. Geschichte der deutschen Nationalkirche in Rom S. Maria dell'Anima. Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder.Google Scholar
Seraphim, August. 1909. Preussisches Urkundenbuch: Politische (allgemeine) Abteilung, vol. 1, part 2. Aalen: Scientia.Google Scholar
Sikorski, Jerzy. 1968. Mikołaj Kopernik na Warmii: Chronologia Życia I Działalnosci [Nicolaus Copernicus in Warmia: the Chronology of his Life and Work]. Olsztyn: Stacja Naukowa Polskiego Towarzystwa Historycznego, Instytut Muzurski w Olsztynie.Google Scholar
Sikorski, Jerzy. 1978. Monarchia Polska i Warmia u Schyłku XV Wieku [The Polish Monarchy and Warmia at the end of the Fifteenth Century]. Olsztyn: Pojezierze.Google Scholar
Strauss, Gerald. 1966. Nuremberg in the Sixteenth Century. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Strehlke, Ernst. 1869. Tabulae Ordinis Theutonici. Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar
Swerdlow, Noel. 1973. “The Derivation and First Draft of Copernicus’ Planetary Theory: A Translation of the Commentariolus with Commentary.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 117:423–512.Google Scholar
Szorc, Alojzy. 2007. “Deutsch-polnische Kooperation bei der Edition von Quellen zur Geschichte Ermlands.” Zeitschrift für die Geschichte und Altertumskunde Ermlands 52:227–44.Google Scholar
Szujski, Józef. 1874. Kroniki Bernarda Wapowskiego z Radochonc, kantora katedr. Krakowskiego [The Chronicles of Bernard Wapowski of Radochonice, Cantor of the Cathedral of Kraków]. Kraków: Nakładem Polskiej adademji umiejetności.Google Scholar
Thunert, Franz. 1896. Akten der Ständetage Preussens, Königlichen Anteils 1466-1479. Danzig: Kafemann.Google Scholar
Tyler, Royall. 1956. The Emperor Charles the Fifth. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Töppen, Max, ed. 1870. “Historia Brevis Magistrorum.” In Scriptores Rerum Prussicarum, vol. 4, edited by Hirsch, Theodor, Töppen, Max, and Strehlke, Ernst, 254–274. Frankfurt: Minerva.Google Scholar
Urban, William. 1978. “The Diplomacy of the Teutonic Knights at the Curia.” Journal of Baltic Studies 9:116–128.Google Scholar
Urban, William. 1991. “Renaissance Humanism in Prussia.” Journal of Baltic Studies 22:29–72.Google Scholar
Voigt, Georg. 1856. Enea Silvio de'Piccolomini als Papst Pius der Zweite und sein Zeitalter. Berlin: Georg Reimer.Google Scholar
Walz, Angelus. 1930. “Zur Lebensgeschichte des Kardinals Nikolaus von Schönberg.” In Mélanges Mandonnet, vol. II. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Westman, Robert. 1990. “Proof, Poetics and Patronage: Copernicus’ Preface to De Revolutionibus.” In Reappraisals of the Scientific Revolution, edited by Lindberg, David and Westman, Robert, 167–205. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Woelky, Carl Peter. 1889. Scriptores Rerum Warmiensium, vol. 2. Braunsberg: Emil Bender.Google Scholar
Woelky, Carl Peter, and Martin Saage, Johann. 1860. Codex Diplomaticus Warmiensis, vol. 1-2. Mainz: Franz Kirchheim.Google Scholar
Woelky, Carl Peter, and Martin Saage, Johann. 1866. Scriptores Rerum Warmiensium, vol. 1. Braunsberg: Emil Bender.Google Scholar
Zinner, Ernst. 1943. Entstehung und Ausbreitung der Coppernicanischen Lehre. Erlangen: Mencke.Google Scholar