Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T09:59:43.101Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Regeneration beneath a dioecious tree species (Spondias purpurea) in a Mexican tropical dry forest

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2014

Moisés Méndez-Toribio
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas (CIEco), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Antigua carretera a Pátzcuaro No 8701, Ex-Hacienda de San José de la Huerta, Morelia, Michoacán, MéxicoCP 58190
Ana María González-Di Pierro
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas (CIEco), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Antigua carretera a Pátzcuaro No 8701, Ex-Hacienda de San José de la Huerta, Morelia, Michoacán, MéxicoCP 58190
Mauricio Quesada
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas (CIEco), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Antigua carretera a Pátzcuaro No 8701, Ex-Hacienda de San José de la Huerta, Morelia, Michoacán, MéxicoCP 58190
Julieta Benítez-Malvido*
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas (CIEco), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Antigua carretera a Pátzcuaro No 8701, Ex-Hacienda de San José de la Huerta, Morelia, Michoacán, MéxicoCP 58190
*
1Corresponding author. Email: jbenitez@cieco.unam.mx

Abstract:

In dioecious plant species different frugivore activity between genders may influence the abundance and richness of the seedling banks underneath their canopies throughout seed removal and dispersal. In the tropical dry forest of Chamela, on the Pacific Coast of Mexico, the role of S. purpurea female trees as nucleation sites of regeneration was investigated. The standing density, species richness and dispersal syndrome of woody seedlings (i.e. trees and shrubs, 10–100 cm tall) recruited underneath and outside the canopy of 10 male and 10 female S. purpurea trees were recorded in a total of 160 1-m2 plots. Total density was greater in seedling communities associated with female trees (i.e. underneath and outside their canopies) as compared with male trees (231 vs. 153 seedlings, respectively); whereas overall species richness was greater underneath female canopies. Further, the density of zoochorous species were greater underneath the canopy of S. purpurea females (range = 0–5 plants m−2), than elsewhere (outside female canopies, range = 0–3 plants m−2; underneath and outside male canopies, range = 0–2 plants m−2), suggesting a directional dispersal bias towards them. Females of dioecious plant species may act as nucleation sites of initial seedling recruitment in tropical dry forests.

Type
Short Communication
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

BEGNINI, R. M. & CASTELLANI, T. T. 2013. Seed rain under the canopies of female and male Myrsine coriacea, a pioneer tree from the Brazilian Atlantic forest. Journal of Tropical Ecology 29:19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BULLOCK, S. 1985. Breeding systems in the flora of a tropical deciduous forest in Mexico. Biotropica 17: 287301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BULLOCK, S. H. & SOLÍS-MAGALLANES, J. A. 1990. Phenology of canopy trees of a tropical deciduous forest in Mexico. Biotropica 22:2235.Google Scholar
CALDERÓN-CORTÉS, N., QUESADA, M. & ESCALERA-VÁZQUEZ, L. H. 2011. Insects as stem engineers: interactions mediated by the twig-girdler Oncideres albomarginata chamela enhance arthropod diversity. PloS One 6 (4):e19083.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CALLAWAY, R. & WALKER, L. 1997. Competition and facilitation: a synthetic approach to interactions in plant communities. Ecology 78:19581965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CHAZDON, R. L., COLWELL, R. K., DENSLOW, J. S. & GUARIGUATA, M. R. 1998. Statistical methods for estimating species richness of woody regeneration in primary and secondary rain forests of northeastern Costa Rica. Pp. 285309 in Dallmeier, F. & Comiskey, J. A. (eds.). Forest biodiversity research, monitoring and modeling: conceptual background and Old World case studies. Parthenon Publishing, Paris.Google Scholar
CHAZDON, R. L., HARVEY, C. A., MARTÍNEZ-RAMOS, M., BALVANERA, P., SCHONDUBE, J. E., STONER, K. E., CABADILLA, L. D. A. & FLORES-HIDALGO, M. 2011. Seasonally dry tropical forest biodiversity and conservation value in agricultural landscapes of Mesoamerica. Pp. 195219 in Dirzo, R., Young, H. S., Mooney, H. A. & Ceballos, G. (eds.). Seasonally dry tropical forests. Island Press, Washington, DC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CRAWLEY, M. 2007. The R book. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester. 942 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DUNPHY, B. K., MURPHY, P. G. & LUGO, A. E. 2000. The tendency for trees to be multiple-stemmed in tropical and subtropical dry forests: studies of Guanica forest, Puerto Rico. Tropical Ecology 41:161168.Google Scholar
FEELEY, K. 2005. The role of clumped defecation in the spatial distribution of soil nutrients and the availability of nutrients for plant uptake. Journal of Tropical Ecology 21:99102.Google Scholar
FORERO-MONTAÑA, J., ZIMMERMAN, J. K. & THOMPSON, J. 2010. Population structure, growth rates and spatial distribution of two dioecious tree species in a wet forest in Puerto Rico. Journal of Tropical Ecology 26:433443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GUEVARA, S., MEAVE, J., MORENO CASASOLA, P. & LABORDE, J. 1992. Floristic composition and structure of vegetation under isolated trees in neotropical pastures. Journal of Vegetation Science 3:655664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IBARRA-MANRIQUEZ, G. & OYAMA, K. 1992. Ecological correlates of reproductive traits of Mexican rain forest trees. American Journal of Botany 79:383394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JANZEN, D. H. 1970. Herbivores and the number of tree species in tropical forests. American Naturalist 104:501528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MANDUJANO, S. 1992. Spondias purpurea L. (Anacardiaceae). Ciruelo. Pp. 145150 in Noguera, F. A., Vega-Rivera, J. H., García-Aldrete, A. N. & Quesada-Avendaño, M. (eds.). Historia Natural de Chamela. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Biología, México.Google Scholar
MANDUJANO, S., GALLINA, S. & BULLOCK, S. H. 1994. Frugivory and dispersal of Spondias purpurea (Anacardiaceae) in a tropical deciduous forest in Mexico. Revista de Biología Tropical 42:107114.Google Scholar
MAZA-VILLALOBOS, S., BALVANERA, P. & MARTÍNEZ-RAMOS, M. 2011. Early regeneration of tropical dry forest from abandoned pastures: contrasting chronosequence and dynamic approaches. Biotropica 43:666675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MIDGLEY, J. J., GALLAHER, K. & KRUGER, L. M. 2012. The role of the elephant (Loxodonta africana) and the tree squirrel (Paraxerus cepapi) in marula (Sclerocarya birrea) seed predation, dispersal and germination. Journal of Tropical Ecology 28:227231.Google Scholar
RHOADES, C. C., SANFORD, R. L. & CLARK, D. B. 1994. Gender dependent influences on soil phosphorus by the dioecious lowland tropical tree Simarouba amara . Biotropica 26:362368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RIPLEY, B. 2001. The R project in statistical computing. MSOR Connections, The Newsletter of the LTSN Maths, Stats & OR Network 1:2325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SCHUPP, E. W., JORDANO, P. & GÓMEZ, J. M. 2010. Seed dispersal effectiveness revisited: a conceptual review. New Phytologist 188:333353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
VERDÚ, M. & GARCÍA-FAYOS, P. 2003. Frugivorous birds mediate sex-biased facilitation in a dioecious nurse plant. Journal of Vegetation Science 14:3542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar