Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T01:16:39.448Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Describing developing phonological systems: A surrebuttal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Judith A. Gierut
Judith A. Gierut*
Affiliation:
Indiana University
*
Judith A. Gierut, Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article refutes the reanalysis of a phonologically disordered child's use of fricatives as developed by Fey (1989) within a relational framework. Evidence in the form of nonsystematic correspondences between this child's substitution patterns and the target sound system is used to further establish the accuracy of the original independent generative analysis developed by Gierut (1986). This evidence supplements and supports the initial claims that this child exhibited a pattern of complementary distribution among the fricatives [f] and [s] and, moreover, the remediation program successfully induced a phonemic split.

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , December 1989 , pp. 469 - 473
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Fey, M. E. (1989). Describing developing phonological systems: A response to Gierut. Applied Psycholinguistics, 10, 455–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gierut, J. A. (1986). Sound change: A phonemic split in a misarticulating child. Applied Psycholinguistics, 7, 57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenstowicz, M., & Kisseberth, C. (1977). Topics in phonological theory. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, M., & Kisseberth, C. (1979). Generative phonology: Description and theory. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1976). Abstractness, opacity and global rules. In Koutsoudas, A. (Ed.), The application and ordering of grammatical rules (pp. 160–186). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Maxwell, E. M. (1981). A study of misarticulation from a linguistic perspective. Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University. [Distributed by the Indiana University Linguistics Club, 1982.]Google Scholar