No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Genes, genomes, and developmental process
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 September 2023
Abstract
The view advanced by Madole & Harden falls back on the dogma of a gene as a DNA sequence that codes for a fixed product with an invariant function regardless of temporal and spatial contexts. This outdated perspective entrenches the metaphor of genes as static units of information and glosses over developmental complexities.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Cao-Lei, L., Veru, F., Elgbeili, G., Szyf, M., Laplante, D. P., & King, S. (2016). DNA methylation mediates the effect of exposure to prenatal maternal stress on cytokine production in children at age 13½ years: Project Ice Storm. Clinical Epigenetics, 8, 54. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-016-0219-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fjell, A. M., Chen, C., Sederevicius, D., Sneve, M. H., Grydeland, H., Krogsrud, S. K., … Walhovd, K. B. (2019). Continuity and discontinuity in human cortical development and change from embryonic stages to old age. Cerebral Cortex, 29, 3879–3890. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhy266CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fujisawa, T. X., Nishitani, S., Takiguchi, S., Shimada, K., Smith, A. K., & Tomoda, A. (2019). Oxytocin receptor DNA methylation and alterations of brain volumes in maltreated children. Neuropsychopharmacology, 44, 2045–2053. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-019-0414-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gawne, R., McKenna, K. Z., & Nijhout, H. F. (2018). Unmodern synthesis: Developmental hierarchies and the origin of phenotypes. BioEssays, 40, 1600265. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.201600265CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gottlieb, G. (1995). Some conceptual deficiencies in “developmental” behavior genetics. Human Development, 38, 131–141. https://doi.org/10.1159/000278306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, P. E., & Stotz, K. (2006). Genes in the postgenomic era. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 27, 499–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-006-9020-yCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griffiths, P. E., & Tabery, J. (2008). Behavioral genetics and development: Historical and conceptual causes of controversy. New Ideas in Psychology, 26, 332–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2007.07.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jablonka, E., & Lamb, M. J. (2005). Evolution in four dimensions: Genetic, epigenetic, behavioral, and symbolic variation in the history of life. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kaplan, J. M., & Turkheimer, E. (2021). Galton's Quincunx: Probabilistic causation in developmental behavior genetics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 88, 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.04.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keller, E. F. (2014). From gene action to reactive genomes. The Journal of Physiology, 592, 2423–2429. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2014.270991CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, G., Nie, J., Wang, L., Shi, F., Lin, W., Gilmore, J. H., & Shen, D. (2013). Mapping region-specific longitudinal cortical surface expansion from birth to 2 years of age. Cerebral Cortex, 23, 2724–2733. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhs265CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McManus, C. J., & Graveley, B. R. (2011). RNA structure and the mechanisms of alternative splicing. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development, 21, 373–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2011.04.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meaney, M. J. (2010). Epigenetics and the biological definition of gene × environment interactions. Child Development, 81, 41–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01381.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miguel, P. M., Pereira, L. O., Silveira, P. P., & Meaney, M. J. (2019). Early environmental influences on the development of children's brain structure and function. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 61, 1127–1133. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.14182CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neumann-Held, E. M. (2001). Let's talk about genes: The process molecular gene concept and its context. In Oyama, S., Griffiths, P. E. & Gray, R. D. (Eds.), Cycles of contingency: Developmental systems and evolution (pp. 69–84). MIT Press.Google Scholar
Newman, S. A. (2019). Inherency of form and function in animal development and evolution. Frontiers in Physiology, 10, 702. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00702CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Overton, W. F., & Lerner, R. M. (2014). Fundamental concepts and methods in developmental science: A relational perspective. Research in Human Development, 11, 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2014.881086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overton, W. F. (2010). Life-span development: Concepts and issues. In Lerner, R. M. (Series Ed.) & Overton, W. F. (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of life-span development: Vol. 1. Cognition, biology, and methods across the lifespan (pp. 1–29). Wiley. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470880166.hlsd001001Google Scholar
Piatigorsky, J. (2007). Gene sharing and evolution: The diversity of protein functions. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portin, P., & Wilkins, A. (2017). The evolving definition of the term “gene”. Genetics, 205, 1353–1364. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.116.196956CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robakis, T. K., Roth, M. C., King, L. S., Humphreys, K. L., Ho, M., Zhang, X., … Gotlib, I. H. (2022). Maternal attachment insecurity, maltreatment history, and depressive symptoms are associated with broad DNA methylation signatures in infants. Molecular Psychiatry, 27, 3306–3315. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-022-01592-wCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Senut, M. C., Cingolani, P., Sen, A., Kruger, A., Shaik, A., Hirsch, H., … Ruden, D. (2012). Epigenetics of early-life lead exposure and effects on brain development. Epigenomics, 4, 665–674. https://doi.org/10.2217/epi.12.58CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
The ENCODE Project Consortium (2007). Identification and analysis of functional elements in 1% of the human genome by the ENCODE pilot project. Nature, 447, 799–816. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The ENCODE Project Consortium (2012). An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature, 489, 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West-Eberhard, M. J. (2003). Developmental plasticity and evolution. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witherington, D. C. (2011). Taking emergence seriously: The centrality of circular causality for dynamic systems approaches to development. Human Development, 54, 66–92. https://doi.org/10.1159/000326814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Target article
Building causal knowledge in behavior genetics
Related commentaries (23)
A disanalogy with RCTs and its implications for second-generation causal knowledge
Addressing genetic essentialism: Sharpening context in behavior genetics
All that glisters is not gold: Genetics and social science
Behavior genetics and randomized controlled trials: A misleading analogy
Behavior genetics: Causality as a dialectical pursuit
Benefits of hereditarian insights for mate choice and parenting
Building causal knowledge in behavior genetics without racial/ethnic diversity will result in weak causal knowledge
Causal dispositionalism in behaviour genetics
Drowning in shallow causality
Extensions of the causal framework to Mendelian randomisation and gene–environment interaction
Genes, genomes, and developmental process
Genetics can inform causation, but the concepts and language we use matters
Genome-wide association study and the randomized controlled trial: A false equivalence
Human genomic data have different statistical properties than the data of randomised controlled trials
Mechanistic understanding of individual outcomes: Challenges and alternatives to genetic designs
Meeting counterfactual causality criteria is not the problem
On the big list of causes
Polygene risk scores and randomized experiments
Shallow versus deep genetic causes
The providential randomisation of genotypes
Theory matters for identifying a causal role for genetic factors in socioeconomic outcomes
When local causes are more explanatorily useful
Where not to look for targets of social reforms and interventions, according to behavioral genetics
Author response
Causal complexity in human research: On the shared challenges of behavior genetics, medical genetics, and environmentally oriented social science