Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T08:57:19.831Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The evolutionary roots of goal-directed mechanisms: A communication account

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2023

Arnaud Badets Open the ORCID record for Arnaud Badets [Opens in a new window]
Arnaud Badets*
Affiliation:
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Laboratoire Institut de Neurosciences Cognitives et Intégratives d’ Aquitaine – CNRS – UMR 5287, 33076 Bordeaux cedex, France. arnaud.badets@u-bordeaux.fr http://www.incia.u-bordeaux1.fr/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Unleashed expressions for cooperation are mainly based on the expected perceptual effects of behaviours and not the behaviours themselves. From an evolutionary viewpoint, this goal-directed mechanism allows for a comprehensive story for the theory proposed by Heintz & Scott-Phillips. Over the past 2 million years, this situated mechanism has been reused for tool use and the language development for hominids.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 46 , 2023 , e3
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, M. L. (2010). Neural reuse: A fundamental organizational principle of the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 245–313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Badets, A., Duville, M., & Osiurak, F. (2020). Tool-number interaction during a prospective memory task. Cognitive Processing, 21(4), 501–508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Badets, A., Koch, I., & Philipp, A. M. (2016). A review of ideomotor approaches to perception, cognition, action, and language: Advancing a cultural recycling hypothesis. Psychological Research, 80, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Badets, A., Michelet, T., de Rugy, A., & Osiurak, F. (2017). Creating semantics in tool use. Cognitive Processing, 18, 129–134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Badets, A., & Osiurak, F. (2017). The ideomotor recycling theory for tool use, language and foresight. Experimental Brain Research, 235, 365–377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corballis, M. C. (2013). Mental time travel: A case for evolutionary continuity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 5–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunde, W., Weller, L., & Pfister, R. (2018). Sociomotor action control. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 917–931.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larsson, M. (2015). Tool-use-associated sound in the evolution of language. Animal Cognition, 18, 993–1005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2013). An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 329–347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shin, Y. K., Proctor, R. W., & Capaldi, E. J. (2010). A review of contemporary ideomotor theory. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 943–974.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 625–636.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed