Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:21:47.964Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quantum modeling of common sense

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2013

Hamid R. Noori  and
Rainer Spanagel
Hamid R. Noori
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychopharmacology, Central Institute for Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, J 5, 68159 Mannheim, Germany. hamid.noori@zi-mannheim.derainer.spanagel@zi-mannheim.dehttp://www.zi-mannheim.de/psychopharmacology.html
Rainer Spanagel
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychopharmacology, Central Institute for Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, J 5, 68159 Mannheim, Germany. hamid.noori@zi-mannheim.derainer.spanagel@zi-mannheim.dehttp://www.zi-mannheim.de/psychopharmacology.html
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Quantum theory is a powerful framework for probabilistic modeling of cognition. Strong empirical evidence suggests the context- and order-dependent representation of human judgment and decision-making processes, which falls beyond the scope of classical Bayesian probability theories. However, considering behavior as the output of underlying neurobiological processes, a fundamental question remains unanswered: Is cognition a probabilistic process at all?

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , June 2013 , pp. 302
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aerts, D. & Aerts, S. (1995) Applications of quantum statistics in psychological studies of decision processes. Foundations of Science 1:85–97.Google Scholar
Griffiths, T. L., Chater, N., Kemp, C., Perfors, A. & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2010) Probabilistic models of cognition: Exploring representations and inductive biases. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14:357–64.Google Scholar
Knowlton, B. J., Morrison, R. G., Hummel, J. E. & Holyoak, K. J. (2012) A neurocomputational model for relational reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16:373–81.Google Scholar
Maia, T. V. & Frank, M. J. (2011) From reinforcement learning models to psychiatric and neurological disorders. Nature Neuroscience 14:154–62.Google Scholar
Morrison, J. H. & Baxter, M. G. (2012) The aging cortical synapse: Hallmarks and implications for cognitive decline. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 13:240–50.Google Scholar
Noori, H. R. & Jäger, W. (2010) Neurochemical oscillations in the basal ganglia. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 72:133–47.Google Scholar
Noori, H. R., Spanagel, R. & Hansson, A. C. (2012) Neurocircuitry for modeling drug effects. Addiction Biology 17:827–64.Google Scholar
Shin, L. M. & Liberzon, I. (2010) The neurocircuitry of fear, stress, and anxiety disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology 35:169–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed