Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T18:19:16.564Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A high temporal resolution data set of ERS scatterometer radar backscatter for research in Arctic and sub-Arctic regions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Yongwei Sheng ,
Laurence C. Smith ,
Karen E. Frey  and
Douglas E. Alsdorf
Yongwei Sheng
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, University of California, Los Angeles, 1255 Bunche Hall, Box 951524, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1524, USA
Laurence C. Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, University of California, Los Angeles, 1255 Bunche Hall, Box 951524, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1524, USA
Karen E. Frey
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, University of California, Los Angeles, 1255 Bunche Hall, Box 951524, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1524, USA
Douglas E. Alsdorf
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, University of California, Los Angeles, 1255 Bunche Hall, Box 951524, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1524, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Radar backscatter in Arctic and sub-Arctic regions is temporally dynamic and reflects changes in sea ice, glacier facies, soil thaw state, vegetation cover, and moisture content. Wind scatterometers on the ERS-1 and ERS-2 satellites have amassed a global archive of C-band radar backscatter data since 1991. This paper derives three high temporal resolution data products from this archive that are designed to facilitate scatterometer research in high-latitude environments. Radar backscatter data have a grid spacing of 25 km and are mapped northwards from 60°N latitude over intervals of one, three, and seven days for the period 1991–2000. Data are corrected to a normalized incident angle of 40°. Animations and full-resolution data products are freely available for scientific use at http://merced.gis.ucla.edu/scatterometer/index.htm.

Type
Articles
Information
Polar Record , Volume 38 , Issue 205 , April 2002 , pp. 115 - 120
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdel-Messeh, M., and Quegan, S.. 2000. Variability in ERS scatterometer measurements over land. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 38 (4): 1767–1776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bingham, A.W., and Drinkwater, M.R.. 2000. Recent changes in the microwave scattering properties of the Antarctic ice sheet. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 38 (4): 1810–1820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boehnke, K., and Wismann, V.. 1997. Detecting soil thawing in Siberia with ERS scatterometer and SAR. In: Third ERS symposium on space at the service of our environment, Florence, Italy, 14–21 March 1997. Noordwijk: European Space Agency (ESA Special Publication 414): 35–40.Google Scholar
Cavanié, A. 1998. An empirical C-band backscatter melt over Arctic sea ice from ERS-1 AMI-wind data. In: Proceedings of a joint ESA-Eumetstat workshop on emerging scatterometer applications: from research to operations, 5–7October 1998, ESTEC, Noordwijk, The Netherlands. Noordwijk: ESA-Eumestat (ESA Special Publication 424): 99–106.Google Scholar
Drinkwater, M.R., Wadhams, P., Low, D., and Liu, X.. 1998. Interannual variability in Weddell Sea ice from ERS wind scatterometer. In: Proceedings of a joint ESA-Eumetstat workshop on emerging scatterometer applications: from research to operations, 5–7 October 1998, ESTEC, Noordwijk, The Netherlands. Noordwijk: ESA-Eumestat (ESA Special Publication 424): 119–123.Google Scholar
Drinkwater, M.R., and Liu, X.. 2000. Seasonal to interannual variability in Antarctic sea-ice surface melt. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 38 (4): 1827–1842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ESA. 1993. ERS-1 user handbook: revision 1. Noordwijk: ESA Publications Division (ESA Special Publication 1148).Google Scholar
Ezraty, R., and Cavanté, A.. 1999. Intercomparison of backscatter maps over Arctic sea ice from NSCAT and ERS scatterometer. Journal of Geophysical Research 104 (C5): 11471–11483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gohin, F., and Cavanié, A. 1994. A first try at identification of sea ice using the three beam scatterometer of ERS-1. International Journal of Remote Sensing 15 (6): 1221–1228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gohin, F., Cavanié, A., and Ezraty, R.. 1998. Evolution of passive and active microwave signatures of a large sea ice feature during its two and half year drift through the Arctic Ocean. Journal of Geophysical Research 103 (C4): 8177–8189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gohin, F., and Maroni, C.. 1998. Scattermeter polar ice grids user manual. Plouzané: IFREMER/CERSAT (Technical Report C2-MUT-W-03-IF version 2.0).Google Scholar
Grandell, J. 1998. Possibilities for a synergetic use of coarse resolution active and passive microwaves for sea ice retrievals. In: Proceedings of a joint ESA-Eumetstat workshop on emerging scatterometer applications: from research to operations, 5–7 October 1998, ESTEC, Noordwijk, The Netherlands. Noordwijk: ESA-Eumestat (ESA Special Publication 424): 107–113.Google Scholar
Grandell, J., Johannessen, J.A., and Hallikainen, M.T.. 1999. Development of a synergetic sea ice retrieval method for the ERS-1 AMI wind scatterometer and SSM/I radiometer. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 37 (2): 668–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jin, Y.Q., and Zhang, N.X.. 1999. Correlation of the ERS and SSM/I observations over snowpack and numerical simulation. International Journal of Remote Sensing 20 (15–16): 3009–3018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennett, R., and Li, F.. 1989. SEASAT over-land scatterometer data, part I: global overview of the Kuband backscatter coefficients. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 27 (5): 592–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Running, S.W., Way, J.B., McDonald, K.C., Kimball, J.S., Frolking, S., Keyser, A.R., and Zimmerman, R.. 1999. Radar remote sensing proposed for monitoring freeze–thaw transitions in boreal regions. EOS, Transactions, American Geophysical Union 80 (213): 220–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, L.C., MacDonald, G.A., Frey, K.E., Velichko, A., Kremenetski, K., Borisova, O., and Forster, R.R.. 2000. US-Russia venture probes Siberian peatlands' sensitivity to climate. EOS, Transactions, American Geophysical Union 81 (491): 503–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wismann, V. 1998. Land surface monitoring with spaceborne scatterometers. In: Proceedings of a joint ESA-Eumetstat workshop on emerging scatterometer applications: from research to operations, 5–7 October 1998, ESTEC, Noordwijk, The Netherlands. Noordwijk: ESA-Eumestat (ESA Special Publication 424): 25–31.Google Scholar
Wismann, V. 2000a. Monitoring of seasonal thawing in Siberia with ERS scatterometer data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 38 (4): 1804–1809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wismann, V. 2000b. Monitoring of seasonal snowmelt on Greenland with ERS scatterometer data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 38 (4): 1821–1826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wismann, V., and Boehnke, K.. 1997. Monitoring snow properties on Greenland with ERS scatterometer and SAR. In: Third ERS symposium on space at the service of our environment, Florence, Italy, 14–21 March 1997. Noordwijk: European Space Agency (ESA Special Publication 414): 857–861.Google Scholar
Woodhouse, I.H., and Hoekman, D.H.. 2000. Determining land-surface parameters from the ERS wind scatterometer. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 38 (1): 126–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar