Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T00:48:25.123Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Large-eddy simulations of gas-turbine swirl injector flow dynamics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2007

SHANWU WANG ,
VIGOR YANG ,
GEORGE HSIAO ,
SHIH-YANG HSIEH  and
HUKAM C. MONGIA
SHANWU WANG
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
VIGOR YANG*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
GEORGE HSIAO
Affiliation:
GE Aviation, Cincinnati, OH 45215, USA
SHIH-YANG HSIEH
Affiliation:
GE Aviation, Cincinnati, OH 45215, USA
HUKAM C. MONGIA
Affiliation:
GE Aviation, Cincinnati, OH 45215, USA
*
† Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: vigor@psu.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A comprehensive study on confined swirling flows in an operational gas-turbine injector was performed by means of large-eddy simulations. The formulation was based on the Favre-filtered conservation equations and a modified Smagorinsky treatment of subgrid-scale motions. The model was then numerically solved by means of a preconditioned density-based finite-volume approach. Calculated mean velocities and turbulence properties show good agreement with experimental data obtained from the laser-Doppler velocimetry measurements. Various aspects of the swirling flow development (such as the central recirculating flow, precessing vortex core and Kelvin–Helmholtz instability) were explored in detail. Both co- and counter-rotating configurations were considered, and the effects of swirl direction on flow characteristics were examined. The flow evolution inside the injector is dictated mainly by the air delivered through the primary swirler. The impact of the secondary swirler appears to be limited.

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 583 , 25 July 2007 , pp. 99 - 122
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bazarov, V., Yang, V. & Puri, P. 2004 Design and dynamics of jet and swirl injectors. Prog. Astronaut. Aeronaut. 200, 19–103.Google Scholar
Berkooz, G., Holmes, P. & Lumley, J. L. 1993 The proper orthogonal decomposition in the analysis of turbulent flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 25, 539–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cai, J., Fu, Y., Elkady, A., Jeng, S. M. & Mongia, H. 2003 Swirl cup modeling part 4: effect of confinement. AIAA Paper 2003–0486.Google Scholar
Chin, J. S., Rizk, N. K. & Razdan, M. K. 2000 Effect of inner and outer airflow characteristics on high liquid pressure prefilming airblast atomization. J. Propul. Power 16, 297–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colin, O., Ducros, F., Veynante, D. & Poinsot, T. 2000 A thickened flame model for large eddy simulations of turbulent premixed combustion. Phys. Fluids 12, 1843–1863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comte-Bellot, G. & Corrsin, S. 1971 Simple Eulerian time correlation of full- and narrow-band velocity signals in grid-generated, isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 48, 273–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erlebacher, G., Hussaini, M. Y., Speziale, C. G. & Zang, T. A. 1992 Toward the large eddy simulation of compressible turbulent flows. J. Fluid Mech. 238, 155–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Germano, M., Piomelli, U., Moin, P. & Cabot, W. H. 1991 A dynamic subgrid-scale eddy viscosity model. Phys. Fluids A: Fluid Dyn. 3, 1760–1765.Google Scholar
Grinstein, F. F., Young, T. R., Gutmark, E. J., Li, G. Q., Hsiao, G. & Mongia, H. C. 2002 Flow dynamics in a swirl combustor. J. Turbulence 3, 030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, A. K., Lilley, D. G. & Syred, N. 1984 Swirl Flows. Abacus, UK. Tunbridge Wells.Google Scholar
Hsiao, G. C. & Mongia, H. C. 2003 Swirl cup modeling part 3: grid independent solution with different turbulence models. AIAA Paper 2003–1349.Google Scholar
Hsiao, G. C., Mongia, H. C. & Vij, A. 2003 Swirl cup modeling part 2: inlet boundary conditions. AIAA Paper 2003–1350.Google Scholar
Hsieh, S. Y. & Yang, V. 1997 A preconditioned flux-differencing scheme for chemically reacting flows at all Mach numbers. Intl J. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 8, 31–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Y. & Yang, V. 2004 Effect of swirl on combustion dynamics in lean-premixed swirl-stabilized combustor. Proc. Combust. Inst. 30, 1775–1782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Y., Sung, H. G., Hsieh, S. Y. & Yang, V. 2003 Large-eddy simulation of combustion dynamics of lean-premixed swirl-stabilized combustor. J. Propul. Power 19, 782–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Y., Wang, S. W. & Yang, V. 2006 A system analysis of combustion dynamics in a lean-premixed swirl-stabilized combustor. AIAA J. 44, 724–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, S., Zhu, J. & Anand, M. 2006 Large-eddy simulations as a design tool for gas turbine combustion systems. AIAA J. 44, 674–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, W. W., Menon, S. & Mongia, H. C. 1999 Numerical simulations of reacting flows in a gas turbine combustor. CST 143, 25–62.Google Scholar
Lasheras, J. C. & Hopfinger, E. J. 2000 Liquid jet instability and atomization in a coaxial gas stream. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 32, 275–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, A. H. 1999 Gas Turbine Combustion, 2nd edn. Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Lu, X. Y., Wang, S. W., Sung, H. G., Hsieh, S. H. & Yang, V. 2005 Large-eddy simulation of turbulent swirling flows injected into a dump chamber. J. Fluid Mech. 527, 171–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucca-Negro, O. & O'Doherty, T. 2001 Vortex breakdown: a review. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 27, 431–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manampathy, G., Mongia, H. C. & Jeng, S. M. 2003 Swirl cup modeling part 8: spray combustion in CFM56 single cup flame tube. AIAA Paper 2003–0319.Google Scholar
Martin, M. P., Piomelli, U. & Candler, G. V. 2000 Subgrid-scale models for compressible large-eddy simulations. Theoret. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 13, 361–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meneveau, C. & Katz, J. 2000 Scale-invariance and turbulence models for large-eddy simulation. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 32, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moin, P. 2002 Advances in large eddy simulation methodology for complex flows. Intl. J. Heat Fluid Flow 23, 710–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moin, P. 2004 Large eddy simulation of multi-phase turbulent flows in realistic combustors. Prog. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 4, 237–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moin, P. & Apte, S. 2006 Large-eddy simulation of realistic gas turbine combustors. AIAA J. 44, 698–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mongia, H. C. 1998 Aero-thermal design and analysis of gas turbine combustion systems: current statushg and future direction. AIAA Paper 1998–3982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mongia, H. C., Al-Roub, M., Danis, A. et al. 2001 Swirl cup modeling: part 1. AIAA Paper 2001–3576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mongia, H. C., Held, T. J., Hsiao, G. C. & Pandalai, R. P. 2003 Challenges and progress in controlling dynamics in gas turbine combustors. J. Propul. Power 19, 822–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novak, F. & Sarpkaya, T. 2000 Turbulent vortex breakdown at high Reynolds number. AIAA J. 38. 287–296.Google Scholar
Piomelli, U. 1999 Large-eddy simulation: achievements and challenges. Prog. Aero. Sci. 35, 335–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piomelli, U., Moin, P. & Ferziger, J. H. 1988 Model consistency in large eddy simulation of turbulent channel flows. Phys. Fluids 31, 1884–1891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, S. B. 2000 Turbulent Flows. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, S. B. 2004 Ten questions concerning the large-eddy simulation of turbulent flows. New J. Phys. 6, 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selle, L., Lartigue, G. Poinsot, T. et al. 2004 Compressible large eddy simulation of turbulent combustion in complex geometry on unstructured meshes. Combust. Flame 137, 489–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, E. J., Held, T. J. & Mongia, H. 2003 Swirl cup modeling part 7: partially- premixed laminar flamelet model validation and simulation of single-cup combustor with gaseous n-heptane. AIAA Paper 2003–0488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Syred, N. 2006 A review of oscillation mechanisms and the role of the precessing vortex core (pvc) in swirl combustion systems. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 32, 93–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Syred, N. & Beer, J. M. 1972 The damping of precessing vortex cores by combustion in swirl generators. Astron. Acta 17, 783–801.Google Scholar
Veynante, D. & Vervisch, L. 2002 Turbulent combustion modeling. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 28, 193–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, P., Bai, X. S., Wessman, M. & Klingmann, J. 2004 Large eddy simulation and experimental studies of a confined turbulent swirling flow. Phys. Fluids 16, 3306–3324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, S. W., Hsieh, S. Y. & Yang, V. 2005 Unsteady flow evolution in swirl injector with radial entry, part i: stationary conditions. Phys. Fluids 17, 045106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoshizawa, A. 1986 Statistical theory for compressible turbulent shear flows, with the applications to subgrid modeling. Phys. Fluids 29, 2152–2164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zang, T. A., Dahlburg, R. B. & Dahlburg, J. P. 1992 Direct and large-eddy simulations of three-dimensional compressible Navier–Stokes turbulence. Phys. Fluids A 2, 127–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar