Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T20:05:33.052Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of weaning on the capacity of pig intestinal villi to digest and absorb nutrients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

B. G. Miller ,
P. S. James ,
M. W. Smith  and
F. J. Bourne
B. G. Miller
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bristol, Longford, Bristol, BSIS 7DU
P. S. James
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Animal Physiology, Cambridge, CB2 4AT
M. W. Smith
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Animal Physiology, Cambridge, CB2 4AT
F. J. Bourne
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bristol, Longford, Bristol, BSIS 7DU
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A comprehensive study of how age and weaning affect intestinal structure and enterocyte ability to digest and absorb nutrients has been carried out in 4- and 6-week-old piglets.

Villus length, which did not change significantly in unweaned piglets 4–6 weeks after birth, was halved 5 days after weaning. Crypt depth, which increased normally in unweaned piglets, is further increased by weaning in both 4- and 6-week-old animals.

Lactase activity, which decreased normally with age, was inhibited more than a-glucosidase by weaning. Weaning of 6-week-old piglets also caused a significant increase in maltase II and III activities. Alkaline phosphatase activity was unaffected by age or weaning in 4- and 6-week-old piglet intestine.

Na-dependent alanine transport was reduced in 6- compared with 4-week-old unweaned piglet intestine. Weaning inhibited Na-dependent alanine transport in 4- but not 6-week-old pigs. Na-independent alanine transport, which was considerably less than that found in the presence of Na, was not noticeably affected by age or weaning.

Weaning-induced problems in intestinal function appear from the present results to be caused more by changes in intestinal structure and specific loss of digestive enzymes rather than by any gross change in absorptive function. The possible role of immune as well as nutritional factors in causing these weaning-dependent changes in intestinal function is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 107 , Issue 3 , December 1986 , pp. 579 - 590
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Dahlqvist, A. (1960). Characterisation of three different hog intestinal maltases. Acta Chemica Scandinavica 13, 1659–1667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dauncey, M. J., Ingram, D. L., James, P. S. & Smith, M. W. (1983). Modification by diet and environmental temperature of enterocyte function in piglet intestine. Journal of Physiology, London 341, 441–452.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gutschmidt, S., Kaul, W. & Riecken, E. O. (1979). A quantitative histochemical technique for the characterisation of α-glucosidases in the brush-border membrane of rat jejunum. Histochemistry 63, 81–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gutschmidt, S., Lange, U. & Riecken, E. O. (1980). Kinetic characterization of unspecific alkaline phosphatase at different villus sites of rat jejunum. Histochemistry 69, 189–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hampson, D. J. (1986). Alterations in piglet small intestinal structure at weaning. Research in Veterinary Science 40, 32–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hampson, D. J. & Kidder, D. E. (1986). Influence of creep feeding and weaning on brush border enzyme activities in the piglet small intestine. Research in Veterinary Science 40, 24–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henning, S. J. (1985). Ontogeny of enzymes in the small intestine. Annual Review of Physiology 47, 231–245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kenworthy, R. (1967). Influence of bacteria on absorption from the small intestine. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 26, 18–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kenworthy, R. (1976). Observations on the effects of weaning in the young pig. Clinical and histopathological studies of intestinal function and morphology. Research in Veterinary Science 21, 69–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kenworthy, R. & Allen, W. D. (1966). Influence of diet and bacteria on small intestinal morphology, with special reference to early weaning. Escherichia coli: studies with germ-free and gnotobiotic pigs. Journal of Comparative Pathology 76, 291–296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lojda, Z. & Kraml, J. (1971). Indogenic methods for glycosidases. III. An improved method with 4-C1-5- Br-3-indolyl-β-D-fucoside and its application in studies of enzymes in the intestine, kidney and other tissues. Histochemie 25, 195–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mccracken, K. J. (1984). Effect of diet composition on digestive development of early-weaned pigs. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 43, 109 A.Google Scholar
Mccracken, K. J. & Kelly, D. (1984). Effect of diet and post-weaning food intake on digestive development of early-weaned pigs. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 43, 110 A.Google Scholar
Manners, M. J. & Stevens, J. A. (1972). Changes from birth to maturity in the pattern of distribution of lactase and sucrase activity in the mucosa of the small intestine of pigs. British Journal of Nutrition 28, 113–127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Markwell, M. A. K., Haas, A. M., Bieber, L. L. & Tolbert, N. E. (1978). Modification of the Lowry procedure to simplify protein determination in membranes and lipoprotein samples. Analytical Biochemistry 87, 206–210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moon, H. W., Kemeny, L. J., Lambert, G., Stark, S. L. & Booth, G. D. (1975). Age-dependent resistance to transmissible gastroenteritis of swine. III. Effects of epithelial cell kinetics on coronavirus production and atrophy of intestinal villi. Veterinary Pathology 12, 434–445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newby, T. J., Miller, B. G., Stokes, C. R. & Bourne, F. J. (1983). Hypersensitivity to dietary antigens as the predisposing factor in post-weaning diarrhoea. Pig Veterinary Society Proceedings 10, 50–58.Google Scholar
Smith, M. W. (1984). Effect of postnatal development and weaning upon the capacity of pig intestinal villi to transport alanine. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 102, 625–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M. W. (1985 a). Expression of digestive and absorptive function in differentiating enterocytes. Annual Review of Physiology 47, 247–260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, M. W. (1985 b). Selective expression of brush border hydrolases by mouse Peyer's patch and jejunal villus enterocytes. Journal of Cellular Physiology 124, 219–225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, M. W., Miller, B. G., James, P. S. & Bourne, F. J. (1985). Effect of weaning on the structure and function of piglet small intestine. In Digestive Physiology in the Pig (ed. Just, A., Jergensen, H. and Fernandez, J. A.), pp. 75–78. Report no. 580 from the National Institute of Animal Science, Denmark.Google Scholar
Smith, M. W., Phillips, A. D. & Walker-Smith, J. A. (1986). Selective inhibition of brush border hydrolase development in coeliac disease and cow's milk protein intolerance. Paediatric Research (in the Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar