Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T17:20:36.701Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The genetic structure of female life history in D. melanogaster: comparisons among populations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2000

PHILIP M. SERVICE
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Two questions were addressed: (1) What is the genetic variance–covariance structure of a suite of four female life history traits in D. melanogaster? and (2) Does the genetic architecture of these traits differ among populations? Three populations of D. melanogaster were studied. Genetic variances and covariances were estimated by sib analysis three times for each population: immediately upon establishment of populations in the laboratory, and subsequently after approximately 6 months and 2 years of laboratory culture. Entire genetic variance–covariance matrices, as well as their individual components, were compared between populations by means of likelihood ratio tests. All traits studied were significantly heritable in at least one-half of estimates. Despite large sample sizes, additive genetic covariances were for the most part not statistically significant, and only two significant negative covariance estimates were obtained throughout the experiments. Therefore, these experiments provide little support for evolutionary life history theories that are based on negative genetic correlations among life history components. Neither do they support the idea that genetic variance for fitness components is maintained by trade-offs. Evidence suggests that the G matrix of one population was initially different from those of the other two populations. Those differences disappeared after 2 years of laboratory culture. At the level of individual (co)variance components, there were relatively few differences among populations, and the overall impression was that the three populations had generally similar genetic architectures for the traits studied.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2000 Cambridge University Press