Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T02:16:16.136Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Maternal effects on body weight in mice selected for large and small size

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

W. K. Al-Murrani  and
R. C. Roberts
W. K. Al-Murrani
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Genetics, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JN
R. C. Roberts
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Genetics, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JN
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Fertilized eggs were transferred reciprocally between large and small mothers, to study maternal effects on body weight in mice selected for large and small size, respectively. Prenatal maternal effects were not important in our material, but postnatal maternal effects were detectable. The postnatal effects accrued mostly from the inadequacy of small mothers for large offspring; small offspring were largely unaffected by the type of mother. Genetic maternal effects were only of limited importance; maternal influences of environmental origin arose from variation in litter size.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 32 , Issue 3 , November 1978 , pp. 295 - 302
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

References

REFERENCES

Al-Murrani, W. K. & Roberts, R. C. (1974). Genetic variation in a line of mice selected to its limit for high body weight. Animal Production 19, 273–289.Google Scholar
Brumby, P. J. (1960). The influence of the maternal environment on growth in mice. Heredity 14, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisen, E. J. (1974). The laboratory mouse as a mammalian model for the genetics of growth. In Proceedings of 1st World Congress on Genetics Applied to Animal Production, Madrid, Spain, 1974, vol. 1, 467–492.Google Scholar
Falconer, D. S. (1964). Maternal effects and selection response. In Genetics Today. Proceedings of Xlth International Congress of Genetics, The Hague, 1963, vol. III, 763–774.Google Scholar
Falconer, D. S. (1973). Replicated selection for body weight in mice. Genetical Research 22, 291–321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanrahan, J. P. & Eisen, E. J. (1970). A lactation curve for mice. Laboratory Animal Care 20, 101–104.Google ScholarPubMed
Legates, J. E. (1972). The role of maternal effects in animal breeding. IV. Maternal effects in laboratory species. Journal of Animal Science 35, 1294–1302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLaren, A. & Michie, D. (1956). Studies on the transfer of fertilized mouse eggs to uterine foster-mothers. I. Factors affecting the implantation and survival of native and transferred eggs. Journal of Experimental Biology 33, 394–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, R. W., Nicholson, H. H., Bogart, R. & Krueger, H. (1960). Predominance of hybrid losses or negative heterosis in mouse crosses. In Biometrical Genetics (ed. Kempthorne, O.). International Union of Biological Sciences, series B (Colloquia), no. 38, 188–109.Google Scholar
Monteiro, L. S. & Falconer, D. S. (1966). Compensatory growth and sexual maturity in mice. Animal Production 8, 179–192.Google Scholar
Willham, R. L. (1963). The covariance between relatives for characters composed of components contributed by related individuals. Biometrics 19, 18–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar