Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-28T21:23:57.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The influence of body condition at calving and dietary protein supply on voluntary food intake and performance in dairy cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

P. C. Garnsworthy  and
G. P. Jones
P. C. Garnsworthy
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture and Horticulture, University of Nottingham School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE12 5RD
G. P. Jones
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture and Horticulture, University of Nottingham School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE12 5RD
Get access

Abstract

Four groups of 12 cows were fed from between 12 and 18 weeks before calving to achieve condition scores at calving of 2·0 (T) or 3·5 (F). For 20 weeks after calving all cows were offered 10 kg/day of a dairy concentrate (metabolizable energy (ME) 13 MJ/kg dry matter (DM)) containing 74 g undegradable dietary protein (UDP) per kg DM (groups TH and FH) or 45 g/kg DM UDP (groups TL and FL), 2 kg/day sugar-beet pulp, 5 kg/day brewers' grains and hay ad libitum.

Milk yields were similar for all groups over the first 20 weeks of lactation, but slightly lower for cows in group FL than for other cows. Cows in group FH lost condition over the first 15 weeks and cows in group FL lost proportionally more condition over the first 12 weeks of lactation. Cows in groups TH and TL increased in condition slightly over the first 20 weeks of lactation. After calving, cows in groups TH and TL had significantly higher intakes of DM, digestible DM and ME than did cows in groups FH and FL (P < 0·001). Cows in group TL had higher intakes than did cows in group TH.

Groups TH and FH were in negative energy balance until weeks 10 and 11 respectively. Group FL was in negative energy balance between weeks 4 and 7 and group TL was only in negative energy balance in week 5. The biological efficiency of milk production (energy output in milk/energy intake) was 0·37, 0·35, 0·40 and 0·38 for groups FH, FL, TH and TL respectively.

It was concluded that cows which are thin at calving produce more milk directly from food than cows which are fat and are biologically more efficient; higher UDP levels in the diet led to increased negative energy balances but in thin cows this was due to lower food intakes whereas in fat cows this was due to higher milk yields which led to greater losses of condition.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 44 , Issue 3 , June 1987 , pp. 347 - 353
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council. 1980. The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
East of Scotland College of Agriculture. 1976. Condition scoring — dairy cows. Advisory Leaflet No. 100.Google Scholar
Frood, M. J. and Croxton, D. 1978. The use of condition scoring in dairy cows and its relationship with milk yield and live weight. Animal Production 27: 285–291.Google Scholar
Garnsworthy, P. C. and Topps, J. H. 1982. The effect of body condition of dairy cows at calving on their food intake and performance when given complete diets. Animal Production 35: 113–119.Google Scholar
Land, C. and Leaver, J. D. 1981. The effect of body condition at calving on the production of Friesian cows and heifers. Animal Production 32: 362–363 (Abstr.)Google Scholar
Lawes Agricultural Trust. 1984. Genstat V, Mark 4.04B. Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Hertfordshire.Google Scholar
Lowman, B. G., Scott, N. and Somerville, S. 1973. Condition scoring of cattle. Bulletin, East of Scotland College of Agriculture, No. 6.Google Scholar
Neilson, D. R., Whittemore, C. T., Lewis, M., Alliston, J. C., Roberts, D. J., Hodgson-Jones, L. S., Mills, J., Parkinson, H. and Prescott, J. H. D. 1983. Production characteristics of high-yielding dairy cows. Animal Production 36: 321–334.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R., Hughes-Jones, M. and McDonald, I. 1981. Degradability of protein supplements and utilization of undegraded protein by high-producing dairy cows. In Recent Developments In Animal Nutrition — 1980 (ed. Haresign, W.), pp. 85–98. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. and McDonald, I. 1979. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92: 499–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treacher, R. J., Reid, I. M. and Roberts, C. J. 1986. Effect of body condition at calving on the health and performance of dairy cows. Animal Production 43: 1–6.Google Scholar
Udén, P., Colucci, P. E. and Van Soest, P. J. 1980. Investigation of chromium, cerium and cobalt as markers in digesta. Rate of passage studies. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 31: 625–632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed