Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T00:52:23.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Case 34 - Coronary stent visualization

from Section 4 - Coronary arteries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2015

Stefan L. Zimmerman
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Stefan L. Zimmerman
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins Medical Centre
Elliot K. Fishman
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins Medical Centre
Get access

Summary

Imaging description

Evaluation of coronary stents with cardiac CT is challenging due to artifacts associated with the metal stent struts. Several artifacts adversely affect CT imaging of stents, the most important of which are blooming, partial volume averaging, and beam hardening. Both blooming and partial volume effects result in the stent struts appearing larger than reality, obscuring visualization of the lumen, and resulting in under-estimation of true lumen diameter (Figure 34.1). Beam hardening artifacts occur due to absorption of low-energy photons by the metal stent struts resulting in primarily high-energy photons passing to the detectors. The result is low- attenuation areas adjacent to stent struts that can mimic instent restenosis. Stent-related artifacts are most pronounced in smaller stents, and current recommendations suggest that imaging of coronary stents should be restricted to patients with larger stents, at least 3 mm in diameter or more. Stents of similar size from different manufacturers can also have variable artifact severity, due to differences in the type of materials used to create the stent. Widening the window width will reduce the blooming effect of stent struts and improve lumen visualization. (Figure 34.1). Visualization can also be optimized and artifacts reduced through the use of the thinnest possible slices, sharp reconstruction kernels, and iterative reconstruction techniques (Figure 34.2).

Importance

Misdiagnosis of in-stent restenosis on cardiac CT can lead to inappropriate cardiac catheterization and the risks and costs associated with the procedure.

Typical clinical scenario

In-stent restenosis, defined as > 50% luminal narrowing, is a common problem in patients with prior percutaneous coronary intervention. Neointimal hyperplasia within the stent is the primary cause of in-stent restenosis. Restenosis rates are approximately 40% with bare metal stents and are reduced to < 10% with drug-eluting stents.

Differential diagnosis

Stent-related artifacts should be distinguished from true in-stent restenosis or occlusion due to neointimal hyperplasia (Figure 34.3). For stents < 3 mm in size, this may be difficult due to limitations of current scanner technology.

Type
Chapter
Information
Pearls and Pitfalls in Cardiovascular Imaging
Pseudolesions, Artifacts, and Other Difficult Diagnoses
, pp. 107 - 108
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Chung, S. H., Kim, Y. J., Hur, J., et al. Evaluation of coronary artery in-stent restenosis by 64-section computed tomography: factors affecting assessment and accurate diagnosis. J Thorac Imaging 2010; 25: 57–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Maintz, D., Burg, M. C., Seifarth, H., et al. Update on multidetector coronary CT angiography of coronary stents: in vitro evaluation of 29 different stent types with dual-source CT. Eur Radiol 2009; 19: 42–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Seifarth, H., Ozgun, M., Raupach, R., et al. 64-Versus 16-slice CT angiography for coronary artery stent assessment: in vitro experience. Invest Radiol 2006; 41: 22–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Mark, D. B., Berman, D. S., Budoff, M. J., et al. ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SAIP/SCAI/SCCT 2010 expert consensus document on coronary computed tomographic angiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 55: 2663–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Mahnken, A. H.. CT Imaging of coronary stents: past, present, and future. ISRN Cardiol 2012; 2012: 139823.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Ebersberger, U., Tricarico, F., Schoepf, U. J., et al. CT evaluation of coronary artery stents with iterative image reconstruction: improvements in image quality and potential for radiation dose reduction. Eur Radiol 2013; 23: 125–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Pugliese, F., Cademartiri, F., van Mieghem, C., et al. Multidetector CT for visualization of coronary stents. Radiographics 2006; 26: 887–904.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×