Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T13:23:39.770Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Legal Trends Driving the Clinical Translation of Pharmacogenomics

from I - Critical Concepts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Russ B. Altman
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
David Flockhart
Affiliation:
Indiana University
David B. Goldstein
Affiliation:
Duke University, North Carolina
Get access

Summary

The Human Genome Project has fueled rapid progress in pharmacogenomics over the past decade. Genetic variability of drug response was suspected in the mid-twentieth century, but scientists only now are gaining the ability to explain this variability and harness it to improve health outcomes. These advances are forcing health care professionals and regulators to reevaluate the duties they owe to the people they serve and protect. Patients with identical symptoms may have genetic differences that carry important implications for the best choice of therapy and for the physician's standard of care. Clinical trial subjects who seem comparable under traditional trial selection criteria like age, gender, or severity of underlying disease may not be comparable at all when genetic differences are taken into account. Studies that gloss over these differences may mislead the public about the safety and effectiveness of the drugs they consume, yet regulators routinely rely on such studies when approving new drugs. Additional steps are needed to protect the public. The very notion of “the public” is evolving as pharmacogenomics divides the population into multiple subgroups. Regulators who once needed only to protect a single, homogeneous “public” now face a situation where their decisions visit disparate impacts on various subgroups within the broader public they are seeking to protect. This shift in perspective already is reshaping the legal and commercial environment for medical products and health care.

This chapter explores trends that are emerging as law adapts to the era of personalized genomic medicine. The focus is on how the broad contours of regulations affecting drugs and medical devices are changing and how these changes may affect clinicians, patients, medical researchers, and people who participate in biomedical research. Important reforms already are in progress, and more can be expected in coming years. One concrete example is the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 (FDAAA), which instituted a major program to modernize medical product regulation by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Related reforms are on the drawing board or already are being implemented in various nations around the world.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Greenfield, SKravitz, RL 2007 http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id
Evans, BJSeven pillars of a new evidentiary paradigm: The Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act enters the genomic eraNotre Dame Law Rev 2010 85 419http://www.nd.edu/∼ndlrev/archive_public/85ndlr2/Evans.pdf;Google Scholar
Roberts, BSBodenheimer, DZThe Drug Amendments of 1962: the anatomy of a regulatory failureArizona State Law J 1982Google Scholar
Levitt, GMCzaban, JNPaterson, ASHuman drug regulationFundamentals of Law and Regulation: An In-Depth Look at Therapeutic ProductsWashington, D.CFood & Drug Law Institute 1999
Evans, BJWhat will it take to reap the clinical benefits of pharmacogenomics?Food Drug Law J 2006 61 753Google Scholar
Dickson, MHurst, JJacobzone, SSurvey of Pharmacoeconomic Assessment Activity in Eleven CountriesParisOrganization for Economic Cooperation and Development 2003
Dodds-Smith, IBagley, GGlobal Counsel Life Sciences Handbook 2004/05LondonPractical Law Company 2004 77
Rawlins, MDNICE work – providing guidance to the British National Health ServicesN Engl J Med 2004 351 1383Google Scholar
Evans, BJFlockhart, DAThe unfinished business of U.S. drug safety regulationFood & Drug Law J 2006 45 53Google Scholar
Kessler, DAVladeck, DCA critical examination of the FDA's efforts to preempt failure-to-warn claimsGeorgetown Law J 2008 96 461Google Scholar
Committee on Identifying & Preventing Medication Errors, Institute of Medicine 2007 http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=11623
Friedman, LMFurberg, CDDeMets, DLFundamentals of Clinical TrialsNew YorkSpringer Science + Business Media, L.L.C 1998 3
Furberg, BDFurberg, CDEvaluating Clinical ResearchNew YorkSpringer Science + Business Media, L.L.C 2007
Duh, MSGreenberg, PEWeinder, PE 2007
Lasser, KEAllen, PEWoolhandler, SJTiming of new black box warnings and withdrawals for prescription medicationsJAMA 2002 287 2215Google Scholar
Wysowski, DKSwartz, LAdverse drug event surveillance and drug withdrawals in the United States1969Arch Intern Med 2005 165 1363Google Scholar
Lexchin, JDrug withdrawals from the Canadian market for safety reasons, 1963–2004CMAJ 2005 172 765Google Scholar
Pillans, PIClinical perspectives in drug safety and adverse drug reactionsExpert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2008 1 695Google Scholar
Institute of Medicine 2007 http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=11910
Melmon, KLAttitudinal factors that influence the utilization of modern evaluative methodsModern Methods of Clinical InvestigationInstitute of Medicine 1990 http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=1550
Kent, DMHayward, RALimitations of applying summary results of clinical trials to individual patients: the need for risk stratificationJAMA 2007 298 1209Google Scholar
Epstein, RAWhy the FDA must preempt tort litigation: a critique of Chevron deference and a response to Richard NagaredaJ Tort Law 2006 1Google Scholar
Grow, JA 1997 http://leda.law.harvard.edu/leda/data/189/jgrow.pdf
The Lewin Group, Inc 2005
Evans, BJ.Distinguishing product and practice regulation in personalized medicineClin Pharmacol Ther 2007 81 288291Google Scholar
Green, SBByar, DPUsing observational data from registries to compare treatments: the fallacy of omnimetricsStat Med 1984 3 361Google Scholar
Evidence-Based Medicine Working GroupEvidence-based medicine: a new approach to teaching the practice of medicineJAMA 1992 268 2420Google Scholar
Woodcock, JLesko, LJPharmacogenetics – tailoring treatment for the outliersN Engl J Med 2009 360 811Google Scholar
Roundtable on Translating Genomic-Based Research for Health, Institute of Medicine 2008 http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=12148
National Cancer Policy Forum, Institute of Medicine 2006 http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=11768
Nagareda, RAFDA preemption: when tort law meets the administrative stateJ Tort Law 2006 1 8http://www.bepress.com/jtl/vol1/iss1Google Scholar
2008 http://oba.od.nih.gov/oba/SACGHS/reports/SACGHS_oversight_report.pdf
Holtzman, Neil A.Watson, Michael S. 1997 http://www.genome.gov/10001733
2000 http://www4.od.nih.gov/oba/sacgt/reports/oversight_report.pdf
Califf, RMClinical trials bureaucracy: unintended consequences of well-intentioned policyClin Trials 2006 3 496Google Scholar
U.S. Food and Drug Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2007 http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Safety/FDAsSentinelInitiative/ucm116513.pdf;
Evans, BJAuthority of the Food and Drug Administration to require data access and control use rights in the Sentinel Data NetworkFood & Drug Law J 2010 65 67Google Scholar
Evans, BJCongress’ new infrastructural model of medical privacyNotre Dame Law Rev 2009 84 585http://www3.nd.edu/∼ndlrev/archive_public/84ndlr2/Evans.pdf;Google Scholar
Evans, BJMeslin, EMEncouraging translational research through harmonization of FDA and common rule informed consent requirements for research with banked specimensJ Legal Med 2006 27 119Google Scholar
Brenneman, FDOutcomes research in surgeryWorld J Surg 1999 23 1220Google Scholar
Perrin, EBDurch, JSSkillman, SM 1999
Diamond, CCMostashari, FShirky, CCollecting and sharing data for population health: a new paradigmHealth Affairs 2009 28 454Google Scholar
Platt, RThe New Sentinel Network – improving the evidence of medical-product safetyN Engl J Med 2009 361 645Google Scholar
Rothstein MAHealth privacy in the electronic ageJ Legal Med 2007 28Google Scholar
Terry NPFrancis LP 2007
Smalley, WShatin, DWysowski, DKContraindicated use of cisapride: impact of Food and Drug Administration regulatory actionJAMA 2000 284 3036Google Scholar
Woosley, RLRice, G 2005 http://www.issues.org/21.2/woosley.html
Gottlieb, SDrug safety proposals and the intrusion of federal regulation into patient freedom and medical practiceHealth Affairs 2007 26 664665Google Scholar
Enzi, MBKennedy, EMRisk management and intrusions on medical practice: striking a balanceHealth Affairs 2007 26 678http://content.healthaffairs.org/cgi/content/abstract/26/3/678Google Scholar
Wilenzick, MLietzan, EDoebler, S 2009 http://www.healthlawyers.org/Members/PracticeGroups/LS/memberbriefings/Documents/Masoudi%20interview_Final.pdf
Gever, J. 2009

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×