Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T07:31:54.524Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Archaeology, history and the uttermost ends of the earth – Tasmania, Tierra del Fuego and the Cape

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Clive Gamble
Clive Gamble*
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Southampton, Southampton SO9 5NH, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Special section
Information
Antiquity , Volume 66 , Issue 252 , September 1992 , pp. 712 - 720
Copyright
Copyright © Antiquity Publications Ltd 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ACKERMAN, R. 1984. Prehistory of the Asian Eskimo zone, in Damas, D. (ed. ),Handbook of north American Indians 5: Arctic: 106–18.Washington (DC): Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
ARGYLL, DUKE OF. 1869.Primeval Man: an examination of some recent specuJations.London: Strahan.Google Scholar
BENDER, B. & MORRIS, B. 1990.Twenty years of history,evolution and social change in gatherer–hunterstudies, in Ingold et al.(ed.):4–14.Google Scholar
BETTINGER, R. 1991.Hunter–gatherers: archaeological and evolutionary theory.New York (NY): Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BINFORD, L.R. 1991.When the going gets tough, the tough get going: Nunamiut local groups, camping patterns and economic organization, in Gamble, C. & Boismier, W. (ed.), Ethnoarchaeologi–caJ approaches to mobile campsites: hunter–gatherer and pastoralist case studies: 25–137. Ann Arbor (MI) International Monographs in prehistory. Ethnoarchaeological series 1.Google Scholar
BIRD–DAVID, N.H. 1990.Hunters and gatherers and other people – a re–examination, in Ingold et al.(ed.): 17–30.Google Scholar
COLLINS, LT.–COL. 1804.An account of the English colony of NewSouth Wales,London.Google Scholar
COSGROVE, R., ALLEN, J.&MARSHALL, B. 1990.Palaeo–ecology and pleistocene human occupation. south central Tasmania, Antiquity 64: 59–87.Google Scholar
DAMPIER, W. 1697 [1937]. A new voyage round the world. London: A.&C. Black.Google Scholar
DARWIN, C. 1871. The descent of Man, and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
DAVY, H. Sir 1830. Consolations in travel or the last days of a philosopher. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
EVANS, J. 1872. Ancient stone implements of Great Britain. Longmans: London.Google Scholar
GAMBLE, CS. 1991. Raising the curtain on human origins, Antiquity 65: 412–17.Google Scholar
GAMBLE, CS. 1992. Timewalkers: the prehistory of global colonization. New York (NY): John Wiley.Google Scholar
In press a. Ancestors and agendas, inYoffee, N.&Sherratt, A. (ed.), 1991.Archaeological theory – who sets the agenda? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
In press b. 1991.From Kostenki to Clovis; centres and edges in Soffer , O. (ed.), From Kostenki to Clovis. New York (NY): Plenum.Google Scholar
GRAEBNER, F. 1909.Die melanesische Bogenkultur und ihre Verwandten, Anthropus 4: 726–80.998–1032.Google Scholar
GRAVES, p. 1991.New models and metaphors for the Neanderthal debate, Current Anthropology 32: 513–41.Google Scholar
HODDER, I. 1982. Symbols in action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
HOWELL, N. 1986.Images of Tasaday and the !Kung: reassessing isolated hunter–gatherers.Unpublished ms. Google Scholar
INGOLD, T., RICHES, D.&WOODBURN, J. (ed.). 1990. Hunters and gatherers 1: history, evolution and social change,. New York (NY): Berg.Google Scholar
JONES, P. 1989.Ideas linking Aborigines and Fue–gians: from Cook to the Kulturkreis school, Australian Aboriginal Studies 2: 2–13.Google Scholar
JONES, R. 1977.The Tasmanian paradox, in R.V.S. Wright (ed.), Stone tools as cultural markers, 189–204. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
JONES, R. 1990.From Kakadu to Kutikina: the southern continent at 18,000 years ago, in Gamble, C. & Soffer, O.(ed.)The world at 18,000 BP 2: Low Latitudes: 264–95. London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
KEELEY, L.H. 1988.Hunter–gatherer economic complexity and ‘population pressure’: a cross–cultural analysis, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 7: 373–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LARTET, E. & CHRISTY, H. 1875–75. Reliquiae Aquitanicae, being contributions to the archaeology and palaeontology of Périgord and the adjoining provinces of Southern France.London.Google Scholar
LOVEJOY, A.O. 1936. The great chain of being: a study of the history of an idea. Cambridge (MA). Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
LUBBOCK, J. 1865. Pre-Historic times, as illustrated by ancient remains and the manners and customs of modern savages. London: Williams&Norgate.Google Scholar
MATTHEW, W.D. 1915. Climate and evolution, Annals of the New York Academy of Science 24: 171–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MAUGHAN-BROWN, D. 1983. The noble savage in anglo–saxon colonial ideology, 1950–1980: ‘Masai’ and ‘Bushmen’ in popular fiction, English in Africa 10: 55–77.Google Scholar
MAZEL, A. 1989. People making history: the last ten thousand years of hunter–gatherer communities in the Thukela Basin, atal Museum Journal of Humanities 1: 1–168.Google Scholar
MEEK, R.L. 1976. Social science and the ignoble savage.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
MOORE, F.C.T. (trs.).1969. The observation of savage peoples by Joseph–Marie Degérando(1800).London: Routledge&Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
MURRAY, T. 1987. Rememberance of things present: appeals to authority in the history and philosophy of archaeology. Ph.D thesis, University of Sydney.Google Scholar
PERKINS, J. 1981. To the ends of the earth.New York (NY): Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
RATZEL, F. 1896. The history of mankind.Translated by A.J. Butler. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
SCHMIDT, W. 1934 [1973]. The culture historical method of ethnology; the scientific approach to the racial question. Westport: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
SCHRIRE, C. 1984.(ed). Past and present in hunter–gatherer studies. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
SOLLAS, W.J. 1911.(ed). Ancient hunters and theirmodern representatives. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
SUTTON, D. 1982. Towards the recognition of convergent cultural adaptation in the subantarctic zone, Current Anthropology 23: 77–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TAYLOR, G. 1927. Environment and race: a study of the evolution, migration, settlement, and status of the races of man. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
WILMSEN, E.N. 1989. Land filled with flies: a political economy of the Kalahari. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
WILSON, D. 1892. Prehistoric man. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
WOODBURN, J. 1980.Hunters and gatherers today and reconstruction of the past,in Gellner, E. Soviet and Western Anthropology.95–117. London: Duckworth.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WOODBURN, J. 1982.Egalitarian societies, Man 17: 431–51.Google Scholar
WOODBURN, J. 1990.African hunter–gatherer social organization: is it best understood as a product of encapsulation? in Ingold et al. (ed.): 31–64.Google Scholar
YESNER, D. 1990. Fuegians and other hunter–gatherers of the subantarctic region: ‘cultural devolution’ reconsidered, in Meehan, B. & White, N. (ed.),Hunter–gatherer demography: past and present: 1–22. Sydney: Oceania Monographs39.Google Scholar
ZVELEBIL, M. 1985. Iron age transformations in northern Russia and the northeast Baltic, in Barker, G. & Gamble, C. (ed.), Beyond domestication in prehistoric Europe: investigations in subsistence archaeology and social complexity: 147–80.London: Academic Press.Google Scholar