Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-27T04:17:51.928Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Drift and Noun Plural Reduplication in Afroasiatic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2009

Robert R. Ratcliffe
Robert R. Ratcliffe
Affiliation:
Kumamoto Prefectural University, Kumamoto, Japan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Noun plurals showing partial reduplication appear sporadically in a wide variety of Afroasiatic languages, particularly in the Chadic, Cushitic, and Semitic groups. In past treatments it has generally been assumed that these examples are remnants of a widespread proto-Afroasiatic process of plural formation by reduplication. The following paper argues on empirical and theoretical grounds that it is more likely that reduplication as such was not a means of plural formation in proto-Afroasiatic and that a reduplicated plural only occurred as a morpho-phonologically conditioned variant of the prosodically extended stem (or ‘nternal-a’) plural. This paper seeks to demonstrate that in those languages where reduplication does occur as a major means of plural formation it is more easily interpreted as an innovation rather than as a conservative retention.

Type
Articles
Information
Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies , Volume 59 , Issue 2 , June 1996 , pp. 296 - 311
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bliese, Loren F. 1981. A generative grammar of Afar. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Brocklemann, Carl. 1908/1913. Grundriss der vergleichenden Grammatik der semitischen Sprachen. (2 vols.) Berlin: Reuther and Reichard.Google Scholar
Chaker, Salem. 1983. Un parler berber d'Algérie. Aix-en-Provence: Université de Provence Service du Publication.Google Scholar
Collinder, Bjorn. 1960. Comparative grammar of the Uralic languages. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Cortade, Jean-Marie. 1969. Essai de grammaire Touareg (Dialecte de l'Ahaggar). Paris: Arts et métiers graphiques.Google Scholar
Corriente, Frederico. 1971. Problematica de la pluralidad in semitca, el plural fracto. Madrid: Institute B.A. Montano.Google Scholar
Dahl, Otto Christian. 1973. Proto-Austronesian. Scandinavian Institute Monograph Series.Google Scholar
Diakonoff, Igor M. 1965. Semito-Hamitic Languages. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Diakonoff, Igor M. 1988. Afrasian Languages. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Firth, J. R. 1948. ‘Sounds and prosodies’, Transactions of the Philological Society, 127–152. Reprinted in Palmer, Frank R. (ed.), Prosodic analysis, 1970. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1955. ‘Internal a-plurals in Afroasiatic’, in Lukas, Johannes (ed.), Afrikanistische Studien Diedrich Westermann zum 80. Gerburtstag gewidmet. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Hanoteau, Adolphe. 1906. Essai de grammaire Kabyle. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Hayward, R. J. 1979. ‘Bayso revisited: some preliminary observations—II’, BSOAS, xlii, 1: 101–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayward, R. J. 1984. The Arbore language: a first investigation. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.Google Scholar
Johnstone, T. M. 1981. Jibbali Lexicon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jungraithmayr, Hermann. 1970. Die Ron Sprachen: Tschadohamitische Studien in Nordnigerien. Gluckstadt: J. J. Augustin.Google Scholar
Kraft, Charles H. and Kirk-Greene, A. H. M.. 1973. Hausa. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin. 1972. ‘Another look at drift’, in Stockwell, Robert and Macaulay, Ronald (ed.), Linguistic change and generative theory. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Leben, William R. 1977. ‘Parsing Hausa plurals’, in Newman, Paul and Newman, Roxana Ma (ed.), Papers in Chadic linguistics, 89–105. Leiden: Afrika-Studiecentrum.Google Scholar
Leslau, Wolf. 1991. Comparative dictionary of Geՙez. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrasowitz.Google Scholar
Lukas, Johannes. 1937/1938. ‘Der hamitische Gehalt der tschadohamitischen Sprachen’, Zeitschrift für Eingeborenen-Sprachen, 28: 286–299.Google Scholar
Lukas, Renate. 1968. ‘Das Nomen in Bade (Nordnigerien)’, Afrika und Übersee, 51: 91–116, 198–224.Google Scholar
Meinhof, Carl. 1912. Die Sprachen der Hamiten. Hamburg: L. Frederieschen.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John. 1981. ‘A prosodic theory of non-concatenative morphology’, Linguistic Inquiry, 12: 373–418.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John. 1983. ‘A prosodic account of Arabic broken plurals’, in Dihoff, I. (ed.), Current Trends in African Linguistics, I. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John. 1993. ‘Template form in prosodic morphology’, in Stvan, L. Smith et al. (ed.), Papers from the third Annual Formal Linguistics Society of Midamerica Conference, 187–218. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John and Prince, Alan. 1990a. ‘Foot and word in prosodic morphology: the Arabic broken plurals’, Natural Language and Linguisitic Theory, 8: 209–283.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John and Prince, Alan. 1990b. ‘Prosodic morphology and templatic morphology’, in Eid, Mushira and McCarthy, John (ed.), Perspectives on Arabic linguistics II. Papers from the second Annual Symposium on Arabic Linguistics, 1–54. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Nakano, Akio. 1970. ‘Text of Gzira dialect of Neo-Aramaic’, Journal of Asian and African Studies, 3: 166–203.Google Scholar
Nakano, Akio. 1973. Conversational texts in Eastern Neo-Aramaic (Gzira Dialect). Tokyo: ILCAA.Google Scholar
Newman, Paul. 1972. ‘Syllable weight as a phonological variable: the nature and function of the contrast between “Heavy” and “Light” syllables’, Studies in African Linguistics, 3/3: 301–323.Google Scholar
Newman, Paul. 1984. ‘Methodological pitfalls in Chadic-Afroasiatic comparisons’, in Bynon, James (ed.), Current progress in Afroasiatic linguistics: papers of the third International Hamito-Semitic Congress, 161–166. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, Paul. 1990. Nominal and verbal plurality in Chadic. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, Frank R. 1955. ‘The “broken plurals” of Tigrinya’, BSOAS, xvii, 3, 548–565. Reprinted in Palmer, (ed.), Prosodic Analysis, 1970. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank R. 1956. ‘“Openness” in Tigre: a problem of prosodic statement’, BSOAS, xviii, 3, 561–577. Reprinted in Palmer, (ed.), Prosodic Analysis, 1970. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank R. 1959. ‘The noun in Bilin’, BSOAS, xxi, 2: 376–391.Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank R. 1962. Morphology of the Tigre noun. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, F. W. 1975. ‘Hausa and Chadic’, in James, and Bynon, Theodora (ed.), Hamito-Semitica, 421–458. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Pencheon, Thomas G. 1973. Tamazight of the Ayt Ndhir. Los Angeles: Undena Publications.Google Scholar
Petracek, Karel. 1960/1961/1962. ‘Die innere Flexion in den Semitischen Sprachen’, Archiv Orientalni, 28: 547–606; 29: 513–45; 30: 361–408.Google Scholar
Prasse, Carl G. 1973. Manuel de grammaire touarègue (Tahaggart). (3 vols.) Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Ratcliffe, Robert R. 1992. ‘The broken plural problem in Arabic, Semitic, and Afroasiatic: a solution based on the diachronic apphcation of prosodic analysis’. Unpublished Yale University Dissertation.Google Scholar
Raz, Shlomo. 1983. Tigre grammar and texts. Malibu: Undena Publications.Google Scholar
Reinisch, Leo. 1882/1887. Die Bilin-Sprache in Nordost Afrika. (2 vols.) Vol. I, Vienna: Carl Gerold's Sohn. Vol. n, Vienna: Alfred Holder.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Franz. 1983. A grammar of Biblical Aramaic. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrasowitz.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward. 1921. Language. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Soden, Wolfram von. 1952. Grundriss der akkadischen Grammatik. Rome: Pontificum Institutum Biblicum.Google Scholar
Zaborski, Andrezej. 1986. The morphology of the nominal plural in the Cushitic languages. Vienna:Afro-Pub.Google Scholar