Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-31T08:18:52.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Modality differences in sign language phonology and morphophonemics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Diane Brentari
Affiliation:
Professor and Director of the American Sign Language Program Purdue University
Richard P. Meier
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin
Kearsy Cormier
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin
David Quinto-Pozos
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin
Get access

Summary

Introduction

In this chapter it is taken as given that phonology is the level of grammatical analysis where primitive structural units without meaning are combined to create an infinite number of meaningful utterances. It is the level of grammar that has a direct link with the articulatory and perceptual phonetic systems, either visual–gestural or auditory–vocal. There has been work on sign language phonology for about 40 years now, and at the beginning of just about every piece on the topic there is some statement like the following:

The goal is, then, to propose a model of ASL [American Sign Language] grammar at a level that is clearly constrained by both the physiology and by the grammatical rules. To the extent that this enterprise is successful, it will enable us to closely compare the structures of spoken and signed languages and begin to address the broader questions of language universals …

(Sandler 1989: vi)

The goal of this chapter is to articulate some of the differences between the phonology of signed and spoken languages that have been brought to light in the last 40 years and to illuminate the role that the physiological bases have in defining abstract units, such as the segment, syllable, and word. There are some who hold a view that sign languages are just like spoken languages except for the substance of the features (Perlmutter 1992).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Battison, Robbin. 1978. Lexical borrowing in American Sign Language. Silver Spring, MD: Linstok Press
Bregman, Albert S. 1990. Auditory scene analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Brentari, Diane. 1990a. Theoretical foundations of American Sign Language phonology. Doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago. (Published 1993, University of Chicago Occasional Papers in Linguistics, Chicago, IL.)
Brentari, Diane. 1990b. Licensing in ASL handshape. In Sign language research: Theoretical issues, ed. Ceil Lucas, 57–68. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press
Brentari, Diane. 1995. Sign language phonology: ASL. In A handbook of phonological theory, ed. John Goldsmith, 615–639. New York: Basil Blackwell
Brentari, Diane. 1996. Trilled movement: Phonetic realization and formal representation. Lingua 98: 43–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brentari, Diane. 1998. A prosodic model of sign language phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Brentari, Diane and Howard, Poizner. 1994. A phonological analysis of a deaf Parkinsonian signer. Language and Cognitive Processes 9: 69–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chao, Y. R. 1968. A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press
Chase, C. and Jenner, A. R.. 1993. Magnocellular visual deficits affect temporal processing of dyslexics. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 682: 326–329CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chomsky, Noam and Morris Halle. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row
Clements, George N. 1985. The geometry of phonological features. Phonology Yearbook 2: 225–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, George N. and Elizabeth V. Hume. 1995. The internal organization of speech sounds. In A handbook of phonological theory, ed. John Goldsmith, 245–306. New York: Basil Blackwell
Corina, David, and Wendy, Sandler. 1993. On the nature of phonological structure in sign language. Phonology 10: 165–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulter, Geoffrey. 1982. On the nature of ASL as a monosyllabic language. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, San Diego, CA
Coulter, Geoffrey, ed. 1993. Phonetics and phonology, Vol. 3: Current issues in ASL phonology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press
Coulter, Geoffrey and Stephen Anderson. 1993. Introduction. In Coulter, ed. (1993), 1–17
Crasborn, Onno. 2001. Phonetic implementation of phonological categories in Sign Language of the Netherlands. Doctoral dissertation, HIL, Leiden University
Dixon, R. M. W. 1977. A grammar of Yidiny. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press
Emmorey, Karen and Harlan Lane. 2000. The signs of language revisited: Festschrift for Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Fischer, Susan and Janis Wynn. 1990. Verb sandwiches in American Sign Language. In Current trends in European sign language research, ed. Siegmund Prillwitz and Tomas Vollhaber, 279–294. Hamburg, Germany: Signum Press
Fortescue, Michael D. 1984. West Greenlandic. London: Croom Helm
Frost, Ram and Shlomo Bentin. 1992. Reading consonants and guessing vowels: Visual word recognition in Hebrew orthography. In Orthography, phonology, morphology and meaning, ed. Ram Frost and Leonard Katz, 27–44. Amsterdam: Elsevier (North-Holland)
Goldsmith, John. 1976. Autosegmental phonology. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA. (Published 1979, New York: Garland Press.)
Goldsmith, John. 1992. Tone and accent in Llogoori. In The joy of syntax: A festschrift in honor of James D. McCawley, ed. D. Brentari, G. Larson, and L. MacLeod, 73–94. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Goldsmith, John. 1995. A handbook of phonological theory. Oxford/Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell
Green, David M. 1971. Temporal auditory acuity. Psychological Review 78: 540–551CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haiman, John. 1979. Hua: A Papuan language of New Guinea. In Languages and their status, ed. Timothy Shopen, 35–90. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop
Hirsch, Ira J., and Carl, E. Sherrick. 1961. Perceived order in different sense modalities. Journal of Experimental Psychology 62: 423–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holzrichter, Amanda S. and Richard P. Meier. 2000. Child-directed signing in ASL. In Language acquisition by eye, ed. Charlene Chamberlain, Jill P. Morford and Rachel Mayberry, 25–40. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Itô, Junko. 1986. Syllable theory in prosodic phonology. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. (Published 1989, New York: Garland Press.)
Jakobson, Roman, Gunnar Fant, and Morris Halle. 1951, reprinted 1972. Preliminaries to speech analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Jenkins, J., Strange, W., and Salvatore, M.. 1994. Vowel identification in mixed-speaker silent-center syllables. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 95: 1030–1035CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klima, Edward S. and Ursula Bellugi. 1979. The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Kohlrausch, A., D. Püschel, and H. Alphei. 1992. Temporal resolution and modulation analysis in models of the auditory system. In The Auditory processes of speech: From sounds to words, ed. Marten E. H. Schouten, 85–98. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter
Liddell, Scott. 1984. THINK and BELIEVE: Sequentiality in American Sign Language. Language 60: 372–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liddell, Scott. 1990. Structures for representing handshape and local movement at the phonemic level. In Theoretical issues in sign language research, Vol. 1, ed. Susan Fischer and Patricia Siple, 37–65. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
Liddell, Scott and Robert E. Johnson. 1983. American Sign Language: The phonological base. Manuscript, Gallaudet University, Washington, DC
Liddell, Scott, and Robert, E. Johnson. 1986. American Sign Language compound formation processes, lexicalization, and phonological remnants. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 4: 445–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liddell, Scott and Robert, E. Johnson. 1989. American Sign Language: The phonological base. Sign Language Studies 64: 197–277Google Scholar
McCarthy, John. 1988. Feature geometry and dependency: A review. Phonetica 41: 84–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, Richard P. 1993. A psycholinguistic perspective on phonological segmentation in sign and speech. In Coulter, ed. (1993), 169–188
Meier, Richard P. 2000. Shared motoric factors in the acquisition of sign and speech. In Emmorey and Lane, 333–356
Meier, Richard P., Claude Mauk, Gene R. Mirus., and Kimberly E. Conlin. 1998. Motoric constraints on early sign acquisition. In Proceedings for the Child Language Research Forum, Vol. 29, ed. Eve Clark, 63–72. Stanford, CA: CSLI
Miller, Christopher. 1996. Phonologie de la langue des signes québecoise: Structure simultanée et axe temporel. Doctoral dissertation, Université du Québec à Montreal
Myers, Scott. 1987. Tone and the structure of words in Shona. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA
Nespor, Marina, and Irene Vogel. 1986. Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris
Padden, Carol. 1983. Interaction of morphology and syntax in American Sign Language. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Diego, CA. (Published 1988, Garland Press, New York.)
Padden, Carol and David, Perlmutter. 1987. American Sign Language and the architecture of phonological theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5: 335–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perlmutter, David. 1992. Sonority and syllable structure in American Sign Language, Linguistic Inquiry 23: 407–442Google Scholar
Petitto, Laura A. 2000. On the biological foundations of human language. In Emmorey and Lane, 449–473
Petitto, Laura A. and Paula, Marentette. 1991. Babbling in the manual mode: Evidence for the ontogeny of language. Science 251: 1493–1496CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sandler, Wendy. 1986. The spreading hand autosegment of American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 50: 1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandler, Wendy. 1987. Sequentiality and simultaneity in American Sign Language phonology. Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin, Texas
Sandler, Wendy. 1989. Phonological representation of the sign. Dordrecht: Foris
Seidenberg, Mark. 1992. Beyond orthographic depth in reading. In Orthography, phonology, morphology and meaning, ed. Ram Frost and Leonard Katz, 85–118. Amsterdam: Elsevier (North-Holland)
Stack, Kelly. 1988. Tiers and syllable structure: Evidence from phonotactics. M.A. thesis, University of California, Los Angeles
Stokoe, William C. 1960. Sign language structure: An outline of the visual communication systems of the American Deaf. Studies in Linguistics, Occasional Papers 8. Silver Spring, MD: Linstok Press
Stokoe, William C., Dorothy C. Casterline, and Carl G. Croneberg. 1965. A dictionary of American Sign Language on linguistic principles. Silver Spring, MD: Linstok Press
Strange, Winifred. 1987. Information for vowels in formant transitions. Journal of Memory and Language 26: 550–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supalla, Ted and Elissa Newport. 1978. How many seats in a chair? The derivation of nouns and verbs in American Sign Language. In Understanding language through sign language research, ed. Patricia Siple, 91–133. New York: Academic Press
Uyechi, Linda. 1995. The geometry of visual phonology. Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA. Published 1996, CSLI, Stanford, California
Hulst, Harry. 1993. Units in the analysis of signs. Phonology 102: 209–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Hulst, Harry. 1995. The composition of handshapes. University of Trondheim, Working Papers in Linguistics, 1–17. Dragvoll, Norway: University of Trondheim
van der Hulst, Harry. 2000. Modularity and modality in phonology. In Phonological knowledge: Conceptual and empirical issues, ed. Noel Burton-Roberts, Philip Carr, and Gerard J. Docherty. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Hulst, Harry and Anne, Mills. 1996. Issues in sign linguistics: Phonetics, phonology and morpho-syntax. Lingua 98: 3–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welsh, R. B. and D. H. Warren. 1986. Intersensory interactions. In Handbook of perception and human performance, Volume 1: Sensory processes and perception, ed. by Kenneth R. Boff, Lloyd Kaufman, and James P. Thomas, 25–36. New York: Wiley
Wilbur, Ronnie. 1987. American Sign Language: Linguistic and applied dimensions, 2nd edition. Boston, MA: Little, Brown
Wilbur, Ronnie B. 1999. Stress in ASL: Empirical evidence and linguistic issues. Language and Speech 42: 229–250CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilbur, Ronnie B. 2000. Phonological and prosodic layering of non-manuals in American Sign Language. In Emmorey and Lane, 213–241
Zec, Draga and Sharon Inkelas. 1990. Prosodically constrained syntax. In The phonology-syntax connection, ed. Sharon Inkelas and Draga Zec, 365–378. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×