Special Series: Current Perspectives On Implicit Cognitive Processing In Clinical Disorders: Implications For Assessment And Intervention
Staying tuned to research in implicit cognition: Relevance for clinical practice with anxiety disorders

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1077-7229(04)80026-9Get rights and content

There is a rich theoretical literature on the automatic nature of fear and anxiety and the role of maladaptive fear schemata. Information processing biases, both implicit and explicit, have been demonstrated among clinically anxious persons, but the clinical applications of this work have not been well developed. This article highlights empirical support for implicit cognition in anxiety (evaluating evidence for biases in attention, interpretation, memory, and automatic associations) and then focuses on the relevance of this research for clinical practice. Potential mechanisms for change in implicit cognition are outlined. Although clinical applications for implicit cognition are not yet well articulated, there is good reason to stay tuned to this research because recent advances in the study of automatic fear processing have potential to lead to better assessment and intervention techniques and better prediction of vulnerability to the onset and return of anxiety.

References (75)

  • MathewsA. et al.

    Effects of psychological treatment on cognitive bias in generalized anxiety disorder

    Behaviour Research and Therapy

    (1995)
  • MattiaJ.I. et al.

    The revised Stroop colour-naming task in social phobics: Diagnostic and treatment outcome implications

    Behaviour Research and Therapy

    (1993)
  • McNallyR.J.

    Automaticity and the anxiety disorders

    Behaviour Research and Therapy

    (1995)
  • MenziesR.G. et al.

    The etiology of phobias: A non-associative account

    Clinical Psychology Review

    (1995)
  • MerckelbachH. et al.

    The etiology of specific phobias: A review

    Clinical Psychology Review

    (1996)
  • Pérez-LópezJ.R. et al.

    Memory for facial expressions in social phobia

    Behaviour Research and Therapy

    (2001)
  • RachmanS.

    Neo-conditioning and the classical theory of fear acquisition

    Clinical Psychology Review

    (1991)
  • RapeeR.M. et al.

    Memory bias in social phobia

    Behaviour Research and Therapy

    (1994)
  • SeligmanM.E.P.

    Phobias and preparedness

    Behavior Therapy

    (1971)
  • SoaresJ.J. et al.

    Preattentive processing, prepared-ness and phobias: Effects of instruction on conditioned electrodermal responses to masked and non-masked fear-relevant stimuli

    Behaviour Research and Therapy

    (1993)
  • StolerL.S. et al.

    Cognitive bias in symptomatic and recovered agoraphobics

    Behaviour Research and Therapy

    (1991)
  • StopaL. et al.

    Cognitive processes in social phobia

    Behaviour Research and Therapy

    (1993)
  • van den HoutM. et al.

    Preconscious processing bias in specific phobia

    Behaviour Research and Therapy

    (1997)
  • WellsA. et al.

    Social phobia: Effects of external attention on anxiety, negative beliefs, and perspective taking

    Behavior Therapy

    (1998)
  • ZoellnerL.A. et al.

    Processing of phobic stimuli and its relationship to outcome

    Behaviour Research and Therapy

    (2000)
  • AreanP.A. et al.

    Comparative effectiveness of social problem-solving therapy and reminiscence therapy as treatments for depression in older adults

    Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

    (1993)
  • BeckA.T.

    Depression: Clinical, experimental, and theoretical aspects

    (1967)
  • BeckA.T.

    Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders

    (1976)
  • BeckA.T. et al.

    Anxiety disorders and phobias

    (1985)
  • BeckerE. et al.

    Memory bias in panic disorder

    Journal of Abnormal Psychology

    (1994)
  • BlairI.V. et al.

    Imagining stereotypes away: The moderation of implicit stereotypes through mental imagery

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (2001)
  • ChamblessD.L. et al.

    Cognitive therapy of anxiety disorders

    Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

    (1993)
  • ClarkD.M. et al.

    Tests of a cognitive theory of panic

  • ClarkeJ.C. et al.

    Hypnosis and behavior therapy: The treatment of anxiety and phobias

    (1983)
  • CloitreM. et al.

    Implicit and explicit memory for catastrophic associations to bodily sensation words in panic disorder

    Cognitive Therapy and Research

    (1994)
  • DasguptaN. et al.

    On the malleability of automatic attitudes: Combating automatic prejudice with images of admired and disliked individuals

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (2001)
  • de JongP.J. et al.

    Dissociations between implicit and explicit attitudes toward phobic stimuli

    Cognition and Emotion

    (2003)
  • Cited by (21)

    • Hoping for more: How cognitive science has and hasn't been helpful to the OCD clinician

      2019, Clinical Psychology Review
      Citation Excerpt :

      Researchers contend that identifying, measuring, and potentially targeting implicit beliefs directly may lead to improved treatment outcomes, given that current evidence-based treatments focus primarily on explicit processes and beliefs (Ouimet, Bahl, & Radomsky, 2016; Roefs et al., 2011). Researchers also distinguish between implicit cognition, which refers to automatic associations between concepts (e.g., toilet-dangerous; Teachman & Woody, 2004) and automatic behavioural tendencies, which refer to rapid and likely uncontrollable approach or avoidance of various stimuli (e.g., Heuer, Rinck, & Becker, 2007), though they are both used as indicators of automatic associations. The most common tool used to assess implicit cognition is the Implicit Association Test (IAT; Greenwald, McGhee, & Schwartz, 1998), for which participants categorize stimuli quickly and accurately, but in different condition blocks.

    • Applying the Quadruple Process model to evaluate change in implicit attitudinal responses during therapy for panic disorder

      2014, Behaviour Research and Therapy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Applying the Quad model is therefore valuable because it allows a more nuanced test of the underlying processes driving changes in IAT effects. Critically, automatic associations may share some similarities with anxious schemas in the sense that they represent interconnected, relatively automatic associations in memory (see Clerkin & Teachman, 2010; Teachman et al., 2008; Teachman & Woody, 2004). Moreover, cognitive behavioral models of panic predict that anxious schemas, or fear networks, guide the ways in which people screen, code, and process information (e.g., Beck, Emery, & Greenberg, 1985).

    • Predictive validity of explicit and implicit threat overestimation in contamination fear

      2013, Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders
    • Subjective fear, interference by threat, and fear associations independently predict fear-related behavior in children

      2012, Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
      Citation Excerpt :

      Several information-processing models highlight the role of controlled and automatic processes in explaining behavior in general, and fearful behavior in particular (e.g., Beck & Clark, 1997; Strack & Deutsch, 2004). A similar differentiation is the one between explicit and implicit fear-related cognitive processes (see Rinck & Becker, 2007; Teachman & Woody, 2004), both of which may influence fear-related behavior – particularly avoidance of feared stimuli – independently of each other. It is therefore important to study both controlled and automatic processes in order to understand behavior in general, and fearful behavior in particular.

    • Automaticity in anxiety disorders and major depressive disorder

      2012, Clinical Psychology Review
      Citation Excerpt :

      Slower classification on the trials in one set of category pairings than in the other (e.g., when the category ‘snakes’ is paired with the category ‘good,’ versus when it is paired with the category ‘bad’) is interpreted as evidence that the categories are not readily associated. By changing the category labels and associated stimuli, this paradigm can be adapted to reflect a range of psychopathology-relevant associations (see De Houwer, 2002; Roefs et al., 2011; Teachman & Woody, 2004). Typically, the task is thought to reflect an automatic evaluation of some kind of target category (e.g., that the self is anxious versus calm, that spiders are dangerous versus safe), although the exact meaning of these automatic associations continues to be debated (e.g., Rothermund & Wentura, 2004).

    • Training implicit social anxiety associations: An experimental intervention

      2010, Journal of Anxiety Disorders
      Citation Excerpt :

      Our goal in the current study was to draw from this exciting early work to investigate another bias that may be particularly valuable for understanding cognitive models of social anxiety: implicit associations (de Jong, 2002; Tanner, Stopa, & De Houwer, 2006). Although there is no way to directly measure schemas because they constitute an abstract construct, implicit associations are thought to reflect elements of anxious schemas in that they are interconnected evaluations in memory that are relatively less amenable to conscious control or introspection (Teachman & Woody, 2004). This connection to schemas is noteworthy because although schemas have been notoriously difficult to operationalize (Fiske & Taylor, 1991), they are integral for understanding cognitive models of anxiety (e.g., Beck, Emery, & Greenberg, 1985).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text