Elsevier

European Urology

Volume 43, Issue 5, May 2003, Pages 576-579
European Urology

Epididymitis in Infants with Anorectal Malformation

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0302-2838(03)00057-5Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective: To document the characteristics of epididymitis in boys with anorectal malformations.

Methods: Sixty-six boys with anorectal malformation were treated between January 1990 and January 2000, in our center. Four of these boys experienced epididymitis attacks. The first three patients had rectourinary fistula and the fourth had a low type anorectal malforation without a rectourinary fistula.

Results: Patients were followed up for seven to nine years and epididymitis did not recur after the definitive operation in the first three patients. The fourth patient had four other episodes of epididymitis postoperatively and no reason for these episodes could be found during the further urological evaluation. Two patients had urinary tract infection and one patient had urinary tract contamination during their episodes of epididymitis.

Conclusion: The cause of the epididymitis can be anorectal malformation with rectourethral fistula itself or another urogenital anomaly that is associated with anorectal malformation. There is a relationship between urinary tract infection and epididymitis in these patients.

Introduction

Epididymitis is one of the causes of acute scrotum in children. Its differential diagnosis should be made immediately, since some other causes of acute scrotum require emergency surgical exploration [1]. Epididymitis is an inflammatory reaction of epididymis to a variety of infectious agents, trauma or sterile urine. Reflux of the urine from the urethra into the ejaculatory duct has also been shown to be a cause of epididymitis [2], [3], [4]. An underlying urogenital anomaly might be present in cases of epididymitis, particularly if the patient is an infant or prepubertal boy [5], [6], [7].

Anorectal malformation (ARM) is a troublesome congenital anomaly in children with its long-term complications and associated anomalies [8], [9]. Among the various associated urogenital pathologies, epididymitis is a rare one [5], [6], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15].

We reviewed our patients with ARM and documented the characteristics of epididymitis, which occurred in these patients.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

One hundred sixteen consecutive patients (66 male, 50 female) were operated for ARM during the period between January 1990 and January 2000, in Marmara University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. All of these patients had their definitive operations in our institution. We reviewed 58 of these 66 boys with a mean follow-up period of 7.8 years (2–12 years). Patients with intermediate and high type ARM were managed with posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) and patients with low type ARM were

Results

Four patients, who had epididymitis underwent their corrective PSARP operation at 17, 9, 6 and 13 months of age and they were followed up for 9, 9, 7 and 7 years, respectively. The first patient required repeated urethral dilatations and had several urinary tract infections after the urethral repair. He had also some bladder dysfunction symptoms after cystostomy and antireflux procedure, but he did not have a recurrence of epididymitis after PSARP and cystostomy. His testicles were normal in

Discussion

Epididymitis is a relatively rare pathology in childhood. Its differentiation from other acute scrotal pathologies is important, since some of them require emergency operation [1]. In many series, an underlying genitourinary abnormality were found in most of the infants and prepubertal boys with epididymitis [5], [6], [7]. UEDR has also been implicated in the aetiology of epididymitis in children [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. Reflux of urine, whether infected or sterile, from the urethra into the

References (15)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text