Elsevier

Journal of Geodynamics

Volume 34, Issue 5, December 2002, Pages 653-666
Journal of Geodynamics

Lateral variations of the modal (a/b) values for the different regions of the world

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-3707(02)00037-6Get rights and content

Abstract

Several catalogues of global earthquakes reported for the time period from 1900 to 2000 have been compiled to examine lateral variations of the modal (a/b) values as derived from the Gutenberg–Richter empirical law. For this purpose, the world was divided into 27 different seismic regions in terms of tectonic environments. The parameters a and b were calculated using the least-squares method. The modal values computed for each region were used to produce a global map of the modal values using a grid space of 3°. The results show that a and b-values do not always supply much information about tectonic environments of the different regions. It is observed that the modal values estimated for different tectonic regions are consistent with seismicity of the world and represent global seismic sources better than a or b values. The highest modal values have been found in the oceanic subduction zones, and the lowest values in the oceanic ridges. Lowest b values are observed in trenches. These observations suggest that there is a correlation between apparent stresses and b values. Mapping of the modal values provides detailed images of the zones presenting low and high seismic activity and it may be used as a measure of seismic potential sources and relative hazard levels.

Introduction

Studying the seismic activity of the world has been done extensively, several researchers calculated different parameters of seismicity by using various methods. The empirical relationship between magnitude and frequency of earthquake occurrences is well known as the Gutenberg–Richter (G–R) relationships. Since Gutenberg and Richter (1944) estimated the parameters a and b, the evaluation of the parameters have been frequently used in statistical calculation of seismicity. The parameter a depends on the seismicity rate which varies greatly from region to region (Olsson, 1999). The parameter b is related to properties of focal material and represents tectonic characteristics of a region (Allen, Amand, Richter, and Nordquist, 1965, Hatzidimitriou, Papadimitrou, Mountrakis, and Papazachos, 1985, Wang, 1988). Details in the sense of these parameters may be found in Yılmaztürk et al. (1999). Gutenberg and Richter (1954) suggested that the b parameter changes between 0.45 and 1.5, while Miyamura (1962) found that b-values, ranging from 0.4 to 1.8 for different tectonic areas, are larger in the oceanic crust than in the Circum-Pacific and the Alpine orogenic zones. Tsapanos (1990) observed that b-values are between 0.75 and 0.85 for 11 different seismic regions of the world. Several empirical scaling functions based on the parameters of a and b have been proposed for different regions and different time intervals (Kaila, Rao, and Narain, 1974, Kaila, and Rao, 1975, Bath, 1981, Bender, 1983, Smith, 1986, Christova, 1992, Tsapanos, and Papazachos, 1998, Al-Amri, Punsalan, and Uy, 1998, Yılmaztürk, et al., 1999).

Recently, Yılmaztürk et al. (1999) and Bayrak et al. (2000) showed that distribution of the modal (a/b) values provide detailed images of the local areas presented by high and low seismic zones in and around Turkey. The main purpose of this study is to calculate the ratio of the parameters a and b from the G–R relations for the different regions of the world and to find relation between the tectonic structures and these values. For this purpose, the world has been divided into different 27 seismic regions and evaluated the parameters of a and b in the G–R relations for each region.

Section snippets

Data

The data used in this study have been compiled from several sources. The earthquakes for the time period from 1900 to 1992 come from the Global Hypocenter Data Base CD-ROM prepared by USGS (Unites States Geological Survey). Nine available catalogues (ABE, BCIS, BDA, GREAT, GUTE, ISS, ISSN, P&S, and PDE) including global earthquakes have been compiled using a rectangular search method. The PDE (preliminary determination of epicenters) data and IRIS (Incorporated Research Institutions for

Gutenberg–Richter relationship

The number of earthquakes in any given area during a specific period of observation is a basic representation of seismicity. The frequency of occurrence of earthquakes can be expressed as a function of magnitude.LogN=a−bMWhere N is cumulative number of earthquakes within a magnitude interval M±ΔM, a and b are constants. The constants known as seismicity parameters were first estimated by Gutenberg and Richter (1944) for different regions. The parameter a showing the activity level of seismicity

Modal values for different regions

Yılmaztürk et al. (1999) pointed out to significance of the distribution of the modal (a/b) values, for earthquake occurrences in and around Turkey. In this study, a similar approach has been applied to different regions of the world as shown in Fig. 2. The observed values for each region are given in Table 1. It is found that the modal values change from 8.83 to 11.23 in the oceanic subduction zones and from 7.03 to 8.00 in the mid-oceanic ridges. It is also observed that the a/b ratio is 8.49

Map of the global modal values

Fig. 4 shows geographical distribution of the modal values of earthquakes. In order to produce a global map of the modal values, the whole world is divided into a grid point mesh 3o×3o. The values of a and b were estimated by the least squares method. Then, the a/b values were calculated for each grid and plotted at the center of grids.

It is observed that the largest modal values are related to the oceanic subduction zones where contour level is between 9.0 and 11.0. Bayrak and Yılmaztürk (1999)

Conclusions

A homogeneous catalogue has been constructed from the global earthquake data compiled from various sources. Relying on the distribution pattern of the modal (a/b) values helps us to better understand the regional seismic activity in relation to the parameters a and b as derived from the Gutenberg–Richter empirical law. Characteristics of these parameters were discussed in Yılmaztürk et al. (1999).

It seems that there is a correlation between b values and apparent stresses associated with

References (25)

  • Bayrak, Y., Erduran, A., Yılmaztürk, A., 2000. Türkiye'deki farklı sismotektonik bölgelerin sismisitesi (Seismicity of...
  • B Bender

    Maximum likelihood estimation of b values for magnitude grouped data

    Bull. Seism. Soc. Am.

    (1983)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text