Trends in Genetics
Volume 17, Issue 8, 1 August 2001, Pages 429-431
Journal home page for Trends in Genetics

Research update
Intrinsic errors in genome annotation

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9525(01)02348-4Get rights and content

Abstract

Genome sequencing is usually followed by routine annotation of protein function based on the assumption that similar sequences will have similar functions. Here, we introduce a simple calculation to estimate the magnitude of any possible annotation errors. We counted the number of discrepancies in the annotation of well-established sets of similar proteins and extrapolated these values to the pairs of similar sequences used for the annotation of different microbial genomes. We conclude that the number of potential errors in the prediction of detailed functions is higher than is usually believed.

References (18)

  • R.L. Tatusov

    A genomic perspective on protein families

    Science

    (1997)
  • T. Dandekar

    Re-annotating the Mycoplasma pneumoniae genome sequence: adding value, function and reading frames

    Nucleic Acids Res.

    (2000)
  • R. Fleishmann

    Whole-genome random sequencing and assembly of Haemophilus influenzae Rd

    Science

    (1995)
  • G. Casari

    Challenging times for bioinformatics

    Nature

    (1995)
  • C. Ouzounis

    Novelties from the complete genome of Mycoplasma genitalium

    Mol. Microbiol.

    (1996)
  • E. Koonin

    Comparison of archaeal and bacterial genomes: computer analysis of protein sequences predicts novel functions and suggests a chimeric origin for the archaea

    Mol. Microbiol.

    (1997)
  • Galperin, M.Y. and Koonin, E.V. (1998) Sources of systematic error in functional annotation of genomes: domain...
  • N.C. Kyrpides et al.

    Whole-genome sequence annotation: ‘Going wrong with confidence’

    Mol. Microbiol.

    (1999)
  • A. Mushegian

    Annotations of biochemically uncharacterized open reading frames (ORFs)

    Mol. Microbiol.

    (2000)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text