Modeling multiple health behaviors and general health☆
Introduction
The United States' current disease burden involves chronic illnesses, such as cardiovascular illness, cancer, and diabetes (Mathers and Loncar, 2006). Healthy behaviors can decrease the risk of these illnesses (Blair et al., 1996, National Research Council, 1989). Good physical and mental health is aided by eating fruits and vegetables, exercising regularly, avoiding smoking, and responsible alcohol intake (USHHS and USDA, 2015). Evidence suggests multiple healthy behaviors further decrease health risk overall (Baer et al., 2010, Berrigan et al., 2003).
Unfortunately, few American adults meet guidelines regarding fruit intake (13.1%), vegetable intake (8.9%) (CDC, 2015a), and exercise (20.9%) (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2017, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1991). Moreover, 15.1% of adults smoke (CDC, 2017) and 23.4% abuse alcohol (CDC, 2017)— health behaviors that are the leading causes of death among American adults (Mokdad et al., 2004). Encouraging healthier diets, more physical activity, smoking cessation, and responsible alcohol consumption are major public health priorities.
Health behavior change emphasizes individual behaviors. However, research is now considering intervention on multiple behaviors. Because multiple health behavior change (MHBC) research is developing, many questions remain (Noar et al., 2008, Prochaska et al., 2008a, Prochaska et al., 2008b), including which behaviors to treat together (Spring et al., 2012). Certain behaviors, such as diet and exercise, tend towards co-action (Chiolero et al., 2006, Mawditt et al., 2016). Lippke et al. (2012) found health behaviors tended to assemble into a health-enhancing or a health-reducing cluster. Theoretically, such clustered behaviors would show the greatest co-action; MHBC interventions may maximize their impact by this synergy (Paiva et al., 2012).
The best behaviors for MHBC interventions often focus around a theme such energy balance (Paiva et al., 2012). Other research suggests that participants choose their behavioral combinations (Allegrante et al., 2008). Since behavioral combination efficacy is a fundamental aspect of MHBC, more research is clearly needed. Chosen behaviors must also demonstrate a strong effect on physical and mental health.
Health behaviors may not be as linked as theorized. Newsom et al. (2005) examined smoking, exercise, alcohol consumption, and diet behaviors within several North American public health datasets and suggested that shared variance is miniscule. Therefore MHBC interventions are conceptually unfounded. This suggests associations between health behaviors and overall health should be examined.
Our research examined links between health behaviors and whether these behaviors were collectively predictive of good health, using a large, nationally representative sample. If the health behaviors are significantly related, it suggests sufficient co-action for a joint intervention. If the health behaviors were relatively independent, it implies behaviors may be addressed separately. Specifically, we examined whether diet, exercise, smoking, and alcohol consumption would form one of two health behavior factors, one promoting good health and one reducing good health, consistent with Lippke et al. (2012). An alternate model assessed whether health behaviors acted as separate variables. In each model, the health behaviors were hypothesized to relate to an outcome factor representing physical and mental health.
Section snippets
Dataset
This study analyzed data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) (CDC, 2013). The BRFSS is an annual telephone survey which assesses health behaviors among adults from the United States' civilian, non-institutionalized population. The BRFSS utilizes a complex, multistage sampling design. Certain variables were collected by all states and others were optional (see Table 1). Data from 2011 were analyzed for the current study (Total N = 506,467). The BRFSS has results comparable
Preliminary analyses
Three factors explained 52.27% of the variance in the variables. The four variables representing general physical and mental health all loaded strongly on the hypothesized factor of Overall Health (Table 3). Minutes of aerobic exercise, strength exercise, fruit consumption, and vegetable consumption loaded together as expected on the second factor, Health Enhance (Table 4). Smoking, binge drinking and drinks per day loaded on a third factor, Health Reduce. Smoking loaded negatively on Overall
Discussion
Using overlapping, rigorous methodologies, results from a large national sample revealed multiple health variables were linked with perceived health status, which in turn was linked with overall physical and mental health. Although there were slight differences in how specific health behaviors related, this same mediational model fit data reasonably well from four states from representative areas of the country (i.e., South: Georgia; Northeast: Massachusetts; Midwest: Minnesota; West: Utah),
Transparency Document
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Joseph Rossi for his help in preparation of this manuscript. Lisa Harlow also extends thanks to the National Institutes of Health grant G20RR030883.
References (59)
- et al.
Multiple health-risk behavior in a chronic disease population: what behaviors do people chose to change?
Prev. Med.
(2008) - et al.
Patterns of health behavior in U. S. adults
Prev. Med.
(2003) - et al.
Clustering of risk behaviors with cigarette consumption: a population-based survey
Prev. Med.
(2006) - et al.
The clustering of health-related behaviours in a British population sample: testing for cohort differences
Prev. Med.
(2016) - et al.
The health consciousness myth: implications of the near independence of major health behaviors in the North American population
Soc. Sci. Med.
(2005) - et al.
Applying health behavior theory to multiple behavior change: considerations and approaches
Prev. Med.
(2008) - et al.
Treated individuals who progress to action or maintenance for one behavior are more likely to make similar progress on another behavior: coaction results of a pooled data analysis of three trials
Prev. Med.
(2012) - et al.
Multiple health behavior change research: an introduction and overview
Prev. Med.
(2008) - et al.
Methods of quantifying change in multiple risk factor interventions
Prev. Med.
(2008) - et al.
Risk factors for mortality in the Nurses' Health Study: a competing risks analysis
Am. J. Epidemiol.
(2010)
The health belief model and personal health behavior
Health Educ. Monogr.
EQS Structural Equations Program Manual
Structural equation modeling in medical research: a primer
BMC. Res. Notes
Physical activity, nutrition and chronic disease
Med. Sci. Sports Exerc.
The scree test for the number of factors
Multivar. Behav. Res.
Current cigarette smoking among adults—United States, 2011
Morb. Mortal. Wkly Rep.
Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey
Adults meeting fruit and vegetable intake recommendations—United States, 2013
Morb. Mortal. Wkly Rep.
How Much Physical Activity Do Adults Need?
National Center for Health Statistics. FastStats
Factors associated with fruit and vegetable consumption among adults
J. Hum. Nutr. Diet.
Effect of diet and exercise, alone or combined on weight and body composition in overweight-to-obese postmenopausal women
Obesity
Missing Data: Analysis and Design
The Essence of Multivariate Thinking
On finite sequences of real numbers
Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A
Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives
Struct. Equ. Model.
Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: an overview and some recommendations
Psychol. Methods
The health belief model: a decade later
Health Educ. Behav.
Binge drinking—United States, 2011
Morb. Mortal. Wkly Rep.
Cited by (9)
Interactions with Nature, Good for the Mind and Body: A Narrative Review
2024, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthPerceived Health Status and its Correlates among Middle-Aged Laotians
2021, Clinical Nursing ResearchMotivation and Self-regulation in Sport and Exercise
2021, Motivation and Self-regulation in Sport and Exercise
- ☆
The authors have no conflict of interest to report. The authors would like to thank Joseph Rossi for his help in preparation of this manuscript. Lisa Harlow also extends thanks to the National Institutes of Health grant G20RR030883.
- 1
Now at the Grand Forks Human Nutrition Research Center, US Department of Agriculture—Agricultural Research Service, Grand Forks, North Dakota.