Elsevier

Preventive Medicine

Volume 53, Issue 3, 1 September 2011, Pages 188-193
Preventive Medicine

Adverse childhood experiences and smoking status in five states

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.06.015Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

Our objective was to examine the associations between adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and smoking behavior among a random sample of adults living in five U.S. states.

Methods

We used data from 25,809 participants of the 2009 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System to assess the relationship of each of the 8 adverse childhood experiences and the adverse childhood experience score to smoking status.

Results and conclusions

Some 59.4% of men and women reported at least one adverse childhood experience. Each of the eight adverse childhood experiences measures was significantly associated with smoking status after adjustment for demographic variables. The prevalence ratios for current and ever smoking increased in a positive graded fashion as the adverse childhood experience score increased. Among adults who reported no adverse childhood experiences, 13.0% were currently smoking and 38.3% had ever smoked. Compared to participants with an adverse childhood experience score of 0, those with an adverse childhood experience score of 5 or more were more likely to be a current smoker (adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR): 2.22, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.92–2.57) and to have ever smoked (aPR: 1.80, 95% CI: 1.67–1.93). Further research is warranted to determine whether the prevention of and interventions for adverse childhood experiences might reduce the burden of smoking-related illness in the general population.

Highlights

► Eight adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) were related to smoking behavior. ► Some 59.4% of men and women reported at least one ACE. ► Each ACE was significantly associated with current smoking status. ► The number of ACEs was significantly associated with current smoking status.

Introduction

Despite impressive declines in the prevalence of cigarette smoking among adults in the United States from 42.4% of adults in 1965 to 20.6% in 2009 (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2010d), smoking continues to exact a heavy toll on morbidity and mortality in the United States (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2010c, Danaei et al., 2009, McGinnis and Foege, 1993, Mokdad et al., 2004). Furthermore, the economic costs attributable to smoking were estimated at $96 billion per year in direct medical expenses as well as more than $97 billion annually in lost productivity during 2000-2004 (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2010c).

The decline in smoking in the United States owes much of its success to efforts of clinicians, public health initiatives, and legislation. The release of the Surgeon General's Report in 1964 generated a number of activities to reduce the prevalence of smoking (U.S. Public Health Service, 1964). Warning labels were added to packs of cigarettes, sale of tobacco products to minors was prohibited, advertising campaigns educated the public about the health risks of smoking and dissuaded people from initiating smoking or advised them to quit smoking, and smoking in public places has been prohibited in some states, municipalities, and individual workplaces. A recent review suggests that a physician's advice to a patient to quit smoking is effective among a certain percentage of patients (Bodner and Dean, 2009). The use of nicotine patches or other pharmaceutical products also helps some patients to quit smoking (Moore et al., 2009).

Despite the success of these efforts, 20.6% of adults in the United States continue to smoke; this estimate has not changed much from the prevalence of 20.9% in 2005 (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2010d). Understanding the factors that contribute to the initiation and continuation of smoking is critical to designing policies and practices that will be effective in reducing the prevalence of smoking. In 1999, Anda et al. (1999) reported that adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) were a novel contributing factor to smoking initiation in adolescence and smoking continuation in adulthood. In that study, the prevalence of having at least one ACE was 63%, and the prevalence of current smoking increased as the numbers of ACEs increased. Adults who reported having five or more ACEs had 5 times the odds of having started smoking at an early age, 3 times the odds of having ever smoked, and 2 times the odds of being a current smoker.

Since then, several additional cross-sectional studies have reported that ACEs are associated with smoking behavior with reported odds ratios of 3.5 for ever smoking, 4.0 for current smoking, and 1.55 to 2.0 for smoking initiation after various adjustments (Jun et al., 2008, King et al., 2006, Nichols and Harlow, 2004, Spratt et al., 2009). Furthermore, a panel study of African Americans found that child maltreatment in terms of neglect, physical abuse, and sexual abuse predicted smoking status (Topitzes et al., 2010).

Prospective data from the Kaiser-CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) ACE Study cohort supports the cross-sectional data. Follow-up of the Kaiser-CDC ACE Study cohort has shown that the number of ACEs was positively related to the incidence of smoking-related lung disease. Hospitalization rates for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and rates of prescription medications used to treat COPD increased as the ACE score increased (Anda et al., 2008). Similarly, hospitalization and death rates from lung cancer increased as the ACE score increased (Brown et al., 2010). In both of these studies, the relationship of the ACE score to COPD and lung cancer were partially mediated by smoking.

Because the initial findings about ACEs and smoking came from a study of enrollees of a large health maintenance organization in California, confirming these observations among a more diverse group in the general population is important to gauge the need for new clinical and public health practices to deal with smoking behaviors that are influenced by ACEs. Therefore, we examined the associations between ACEs and smoking status in a large sample of adults living in five geographically and demographically diverse U.S. states.

Section snippets

Methods

We used data from the 2009 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2010a). The BRFSS is conducted in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and three territories. In each state, an independent probability sample from noninstitutionalized adults aged ≥ 18 years with telephones was selected by using disproportionate stratified sampling (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006). All states used an identical core questionnaire

Results

Of the 29,212 participants in the five states that administered the ACE questionnaire, 26,229 (90%) provided responses to all 11 questions used to create the ACE score. Of these 26,229 participants, 26,139 had information to establish smoking status. After excluding participants with missing values for a covariate, 25,809 participants were included in the analysis.

Reporting at least one ACE was relatively common: 40.6% reported no ACE, 22.4% reported one, 13.1% reported two, 8.8% reported

Discussion

Population-based data from the BRFSS demonstrated a strong link between ACEs and smoking status. Moreover, as the ACE score increased, the risk of current smoking and ever smoking increased. Our analyses provide support for the previous findings of the Kaiser-ACE Study. Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) have recently emerged as a set of exposures that have a strong impact on a wide array of public health and social problems (Anda et al., 2010) including strong relationships with smoking

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

References (48)

  • P. Miller

    Family structure, personality, drinking, smoking and illicit drug use: a study of UK teenagers

    Drug Alcohol Depend.

    (1997)
  • O.F. Pomerleau et al.

    Neuroregulators and the reinforcement of smoking: towards a biobehavioral explanation

    Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.

    (1984)
  • R. Wells et al.

    A validational study of the Structured Interview of Symptoms Associated with Sexual Abuse (SASA) using three samples of sexually abused, allegedly abused, and nonabused boys

    Child Abuse Negl.

    (1997)
  • G.E. Wyatt

    The sexual abuse of Afro-American and white-American women in childhood

    Child Abuse Negl.

    (1985)
  • R.F. Anda et al.

    Depression and the dynamics of smoking. A national perspective

    JAMA

    (1990)
  • R.F. Anda et al.

    Adverse childhood experiences and smoking during adolescence and adulthood

    JAMA

    (1999)
  • T.E. Arpawong et al.

    Family and personal protective factors moderate the effects of adversity and negative disposition on smoking among Chinese adolescents

    Subst. Use Misuse

    (2010)
  • S.J. Blumberg et al.

    Wireless Substitution: Early Release of Estimates From the National Health Interview Survey, July–December 2009

  • M.E. Bodner et al.

    Advice as a smoking cessation strategy: a systematic review and implications for physical therapists

    Physiother. Theory Pract.

    (2009)
  • D.W. Brown et al.

    Adverse childhood experiences are associated with the risk of lung cancer: a prospective cohort study

    BMC Public Health

    (2010)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

    Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Operational and User's Guide Version 3.0

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

    Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

    BRFSS policy memo 97.1 cognitive testing

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

    Smoking & Tobacco use

  • Cited by (194)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Disclaimer: The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

    View full text