Tempo and mode in coevolution of Agave sensu lato (Agavoideae, Asparagaceae) and its bat pollinators, Glossophaginae (Phyllostomidae)
Graphical abstract
Introduction
Two clades of succulent plants define the landscape of most of Mexico and the Southwestern United States: Agavoideae and Cactaceae. Within these clades, two prominent lineages, Agave (ca. 211 species) and columnar cacti (Pachycereeae tribe, Cactaceae, ca. 58 species) are both mainly pollinated by bats, and are considered keystone species because of their local abundance and the high quantity of resources they provide (Good-Avila et al., 2006, Rocha et al., 2006, Hernández-Hernández et al., 2014). Both lineages exhibit asymmetric relationships with their pollinators (Slauson, 2000): while the nectarivorous bats (subfamily Glossophaginae) almost completely rely on these two plant resources for survival in arid and semi-arid regions (Arita and Humphrey, 1988, Rojas-Martinez et al., 1999, Trejo-Salazar et al., 2016), the degree of reliance of the agaves and columnar cacti on bat pollination depends on the abundance of the bat species in the region, but is rarely exclusive of them (Munguía-Rosas et al., 2009). In other regions of Mexico, in particular the dry tropical forests, Glossophaginae bats feed mainly on other tropical tree species, in particular, members of the Bombacoideae (Malvaceae) such as Ceiba and Pseudobombax (Álvarez and González Quintero, 1970, Arita and Ceballos, 1997). Consequently, it has been suggested that the relationship between columnar cacti, Agave and Glossophaginae bats may represent a complex case of diffuse coevolution, a shared evolutionary history between two lineages without coincident speciation and thus few species of one lineage influencing several species of the other lineage in a reciprocal manner (Valiente-Banuet et al., 1996, Valiente-Banuet, 2002, Good-Avila et al., 2006, Rocha et al., 2006, Trejo-Salazar et al., 2015, Trejo-Salazar et al., 2016). This hypothesis was proposed based on the observations of an overlapping distribution and a chiropterophilous pollination syndrome present in Agave and most columnar cacti, but it is also supported by field observations and experiments (Arizaga, 2000, Eguiarte et al., 2000, Molina-Freaner and Eguiarte, 2003, Rocha et al., 2006, Trejo-Salazar et al., 2015, Trejo-Salazar et al., 2016). To test if the relationship among these groups is an example of diffuse coevolution, a careful calibration of the time of origin and diversification is needed.
Within the Chiroptera, only two families contain nectarivorous bats, one in the Old World (Pteropodidae) and the other from the New World (Phyllostomidae). Among new world bats only Glossophaginae and Lonchophyllinae exhibit nectarivory, representing an example of dietary convergence based on morphological, behavioral, ecological and physiological strong resemblances. These independent adaptations to a nectar-feeding lifestyle in bats originated during the Miocene at (17–25) and (8–19) Ma respectively (Datzmann et al., 2010, Rojas et al., 2011, Rojas et al., 2012). In particular, the bat species that pollinate agave and cacti belong to the Subfamily Glossophaginae (sensu Baker et al., 2016), which contains 13 genera, most of them (eight) with representatives in Mexico (Arita and Santos del Prado, 1999). Within Glossophaginae, members of Leptonycteris, Glossophaga and Choeronycteris are considered to be the most specialized, feeding exclusively on nectar and pollen (Arizmendi et al., 2002). Moreover, the three species within the Leptonycteris genus feed primarily from agave and columnar cacti nectar and pollen (Arita and Humphrey, 1988, Rojas-Martinez et al., 1999, Cole and Wilson, 2006, Trejo-Salazar et al., 2016). Bats are able to travel long distances if they are provided with an abundant and easily accessible source of highly energetic, nocturnally released reward (see review in Fleming et al., 2009). The preference of Leptonycteris bats for agave and columnar cacti flowers arises from their needs for both resource accessibility (Muchhala, 2003, Fleming et al., 2009) and a high nectar volume. In addition, Agave nectar contains dimethylsulfides (de la Fuente et al., 2007), aromatic compounds to which nectar-feeding bats are strongly attracted (von Helversen et al., 2000). These compounds are found in a wide range of unrelated bat-pollinated plants, including agaves and columnar cacti, probably as a result of convergent evolution (Knudsen and Tollsten, 1995).
Agave is highly adapted to arid and semi-arid conditions exhibiting Crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM), and producing a characteristic massive inflorescence (Eguiarte et al., 2000, Eguiarte et al., 2013, Rocha et al., 2006; see Heyduk et al., 2016 for a detailed analysis on the evolution of CAM within the Agavoidae), which is followed by the death of the vegetative rosette, in contrast to iteroparous columnar cacti. Agave has traditionally been divided into two subgenera based on the branching of the inflorescence: Littaea which has an unbranched spike or racemose inflorescence (including eight morphological groups Berger 1921 (in Gentry, 1982)) and Agave with a branched or paniculate inflorescence (including 12 morphological groups; Berger 1921 (in Gentry, 1982)). A molecular estimate of the time of origin of Agave sensu lato (consisting of the monophyletic lineages of Agave sensu stricto, Manfreda, Polianthes and Prochnyanthes) indicated that the genus is young, 7.8–10.6 Ma (Good-Avila et al., 2006), and has undergone rapid diversification, potentially driven by an adaptive radiation.
Our main aim was to answer two central questions: Does the current ecological interaction between Glossophaginae bats and Agave sensu lato species represent a diffuse coevolutionary process? If so, could bat pollination have driven, at least in part, the rapid diversification of Agave?
In order to answer these questions, we extended the study mentioned previously in two ways: first, by including more representatives of herbaceous species, and second, by determining the most likely diversification model for Agave sensu lato and the rest of the sampled members of the family. In addition, to assess the potential of a shared evolutionary history between these two lineages, we addressed the monophyly of the nectarivorous groups within the Glossophaginae bats and estimated their date of divergence.
Section snippets
Sampling
Particular attention was devoted to taxonomic sampling for both groups, Agavoideae (i.e., what used to be considered Agavaceae, as defined in Dahlgren et al., 1985, Rocha et al., 2006) and the Phyllostomidae, because it is well known that the proportion of taxa sampled has an effect not only on phylogenetic inference (Felsenstein, 1978, Poe, 1998), but also on estimates of molecular divergence and diversification rates in the focal clade (Sanderson and Doyle, 2001, Linder et al., 2005).
Amplification and sequencing
We obtained sequence data for 12% of the Mexican members of Agave sensu stricto, including members of all Mexican morphological groups of Littaea, and four (out of nine) morphological groups of Mexican members of the subgenus Agave. Regarding the herbaceous genera, 37% of the total species were included. All of the morphological groups of Manfreda, Polianthes and Prochnyanthes (a mono-generic clade) were represented, except for one Manfreda group (Verhoek, 1975). Thus, in total 17.5% of Mexican
Discussion
Our phylogenetic reconstruction and dating analysis with an extended sampling effort confirm a relatively recent 5–8 Ma monophyletic origin of Agave sensu lato, with a very high diversification rate. Manfreda, Polianthes and Prochnyanthes do not group together in a monophyletic clade nested within Agave, suggesting multiple origins of the herbaceous habit within the genus. Our estimate on the crown age of Glosophagini (18–22 Ma) and Choeronycterini (12–16 Ma), the most specialized tribes within
Acknowledgments
This research was funded by Proyecto Conacyt SEP-2004-C01-46475-Q and Proyecto Papiit IN224309-3. We thank the Posgrado en Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México and the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, México for granting scholarship 207136 to INFA, 262540 to LLSR and 16961 to RETS. The authors would like to thank Aldo Valera, Erika Aguirre, and Sandra Gómez for providing laboratory help during this study, Laura Espinosa-Asuar for laboratory help and sequencing
References (108)
- et al.
Volatile and carbohydrate composition of rare unifloral honeys from Spain
Food Chem.
(2007) Diversification of Lupinus (Leguminosae) in the western New World: Derived evolution of perennial life history and colonization of montane habitats
Mol. Phylogenet. Evol.
(2008)- et al.
Neotropical mutualism between Acacia and Pseudomyrmex: phylogeny and divergence times
Mol. Phylogenet. Evol.
(2010) - et al.
Evolution of CAM anatomy predates the origins of Crassulacean acid metabolism in the Agavoideae (Asparagaceae)
Mol. Phylogenet. Evol.
(2016) - et al.
Taxon sampling effects in molecular clock dating: an example from the African Restionaceae
Mol. Phylogent. Evol.
(2005) - et al.
Protoyucca shadishii gen. et sp. nov., an Arborescent Monocotyledon with Secondary Growth from the Middle Miocene of Northwestern Nevada, USA
Rev. Paleobot. Palyno.
(1990) - et al.
¿ Quién poliniza realmente los agaves? Diversidad de visitantes florales en 3 especies de Agave (Agavoideae: Asparagaceae)
Rev. Mex. Biodivers.
(2015) - et al.
Análisis polínico del contenido gástrico de murciélagos Glossophaginae de México
Anales de la Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas
(1970) - et al.
Contemporaneous and recent radiations of the world’s major succulent plant lineages
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.-Biol., U.S.A.
(2011) - et al.
Multilocus phylogenetic inference in subfamily Chlorogaloideae and related genera of Agavaceae – Informing questions in taxonomy at multiple ranks
Mol. Phylogenet. Evol.
(2015)