Tempo and mode in coevolution of Agave sensu lato (Agavoideae, Asparagaceae) and its bat pollinators, Glossophaginae (Phyllostomidae)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2019.01.004Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Agave sensu lato appeared around 8 Mya.

  • The best supported diversification model for Agavoidae shows two shifts around 8 Mya.

  • Agave sensu lato speciation rate has been increasing towards the present.

  • Nectarivorous bats from the Glossophaginae subfamily originated around 7 Mya.

  • Agave and their pollinating bats share a diffuse coevolutionary history.

Abstract

The genus Agave sensu lato contains ca. 211 described species, many of which are considered keystone species because of their ecological dominance and the quantity of resources they provide with their massive, nectar-rich inflorescences. The large diversity of Agave species has been hypothesized as being related to their reproductive strategy (predominantly monocarpic) and diverse pollinators (e.g., bats, hummingbirds, hawkmoths). In particular, Agave species provide resources that a few genera of nectar feeding bats from the subfamily Glosophaginae are dependent upon. To explore a possible coevolutionary relationship between Agave and the bat species that pollinate them, we calibrated molecular phylogenies of both groups and looked for a correlation in their dates of divergence. One coding and two non-coding regions of the chloroplast genome were sequenced from 49 species of the Agavoideae (Asparagaceae), and the mitochondrial gene Cyt-b and nuclear coding gene RAG2 were either sequenced or obtained from gene bank for 120 Phyllostomid bats. Results from the analyses indicate that Agave sensu lato is a young genus (estimated crown age 2.7–8.5/stem age 4.6–12.3 Ma), with an increasing diversification rate, and the highest speciation rate among Agavoideae’s clades. The origin of the Glossophaginae bats (stem age 20.3–23.5 Ma) occurred prior to the stem age of Agave sensu lato, while the origin of the current pollinators of Agave species, members of the genera Glossophaga, Leptonycteris, Anoura, Choeronyscus, Musonycteris and Choeronycteris, was estimated to be around 6.3–16.2 Ma, overlapping with the stem age of Agave sensu lato, supporting the hypothesis of diffuse coevolution.

Introduction

Two clades of succulent plants define the landscape of most of Mexico and the Southwestern United States: Agavoideae and Cactaceae. Within these clades, two prominent lineages, Agave (ca. 211 species) and columnar cacti (Pachycereeae tribe, Cactaceae, ca. 58 species) are both mainly pollinated by bats, and are considered keystone species because of their local abundance and the high quantity of resources they provide (Good-Avila et al., 2006, Rocha et al., 2006, Hernández-Hernández et al., 2014). Both lineages exhibit asymmetric relationships with their pollinators (Slauson, 2000): while the nectarivorous bats (subfamily Glossophaginae) almost completely rely on these two plant resources for survival in arid and semi-arid regions (Arita and Humphrey, 1988, Rojas-Martinez et al., 1999, Trejo-Salazar et al., 2016), the degree of reliance of the agaves and columnar cacti on bat pollination depends on the abundance of the bat species in the region, but is rarely exclusive of them (Munguía-Rosas et al., 2009). In other regions of Mexico, in particular the dry tropical forests, Glossophaginae bats feed mainly on other tropical tree species, in particular, members of the Bombacoideae (Malvaceae) such as Ceiba and Pseudobombax (Álvarez and González Quintero, 1970, Arita and Ceballos, 1997). Consequently, it has been suggested that the relationship between columnar cacti, Agave and Glossophaginae bats may represent a complex case of diffuse coevolution, a shared evolutionary history between two lineages without coincident speciation and thus few species of one lineage influencing several species of the other lineage in a reciprocal manner (Valiente-Banuet et al., 1996, Valiente-Banuet, 2002, Good-Avila et al., 2006, Rocha et al., 2006, Trejo-Salazar et al., 2015, Trejo-Salazar et al., 2016). This hypothesis was proposed based on the observations of an overlapping distribution and a chiropterophilous pollination syndrome present in Agave and most columnar cacti, but it is also supported by field observations and experiments (Arizaga, 2000, Eguiarte et al., 2000, Molina-Freaner and Eguiarte, 2003, Rocha et al., 2006, Trejo-Salazar et al., 2015, Trejo-Salazar et al., 2016). To test if the relationship among these groups is an example of diffuse coevolution, a careful calibration of the time of origin and diversification is needed.

Within the Chiroptera, only two families contain nectarivorous bats, one in the Old World (Pteropodidae) and the other from the New World (Phyllostomidae). Among new world bats only Glossophaginae and Lonchophyllinae exhibit nectarivory, representing an example of dietary convergence based on morphological, behavioral, ecological and physiological strong resemblances. These independent adaptations to a nectar-feeding lifestyle in bats originated during the Miocene at (17–25) and (8–19) Ma respectively (Datzmann et al., 2010, Rojas et al., 2011, Rojas et al., 2012). In particular, the bat species that pollinate agave and cacti belong to the Subfamily Glossophaginae (sensu Baker et al., 2016), which contains 13 genera, most of them (eight) with representatives in Mexico (Arita and Santos del Prado, 1999). Within Glossophaginae, members of Leptonycteris, Glossophaga and Choeronycteris are considered to be the most specialized, feeding exclusively on nectar and pollen (Arizmendi et al., 2002). Moreover, the three species within the Leptonycteris genus feed primarily from agave and columnar cacti nectar and pollen (Arita and Humphrey, 1988, Rojas-Martinez et al., 1999, Cole and Wilson, 2006, Trejo-Salazar et al., 2016). Bats are able to travel long distances if they are provided with an abundant and easily accessible source of highly energetic, nocturnally released reward (see review in Fleming et al., 2009). The preference of Leptonycteris bats for agave and columnar cacti flowers arises from their needs for both resource accessibility (Muchhala, 2003, Fleming et al., 2009) and a high nectar volume. In addition, Agave nectar contains dimethylsulfides (de la Fuente et al., 2007), aromatic compounds to which nectar-feeding bats are strongly attracted (von Helversen et al., 2000). These compounds are found in a wide range of unrelated bat-pollinated plants, including agaves and columnar cacti, probably as a result of convergent evolution (Knudsen and Tollsten, 1995).

Agave is highly adapted to arid and semi-arid conditions exhibiting Crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM), and producing a characteristic massive inflorescence (Eguiarte et al., 2000, Eguiarte et al., 2013, Rocha et al., 2006; see Heyduk et al., 2016 for a detailed analysis on the evolution of CAM within the Agavoidae), which is followed by the death of the vegetative rosette, in contrast to iteroparous columnar cacti. Agave has traditionally been divided into two subgenera based on the branching of the inflorescence: Littaea which has an unbranched spike or racemose inflorescence (including eight morphological groups Berger 1921 (in Gentry, 1982)) and Agave with a branched or paniculate inflorescence (including 12 morphological groups; Berger 1921 (in Gentry, 1982)). A molecular estimate of the time of origin of Agave sensu lato (consisting of the monophyletic lineages of Agave sensu stricto, Manfreda, Polianthes and Prochnyanthes) indicated that the genus is young, 7.8–10.6 Ma (Good-Avila et al., 2006), and has undergone rapid diversification, potentially driven by an adaptive radiation.

Our main aim was to answer two central questions: Does the current ecological interaction between Glossophaginae bats and Agave sensu lato species represent a diffuse coevolutionary process? If so, could bat pollination have driven, at least in part, the rapid diversification of Agave?

In order to answer these questions, we extended the study mentioned previously in two ways: first, by including more representatives of herbaceous species, and second, by determining the most likely diversification model for Agave sensu lato and the rest of the sampled members of the family. In addition, to assess the potential of a shared evolutionary history between these two lineages, we addressed the monophyly of the nectarivorous groups within the Glossophaginae bats and estimated their date of divergence.

Section snippets

Sampling

Particular attention was devoted to taxonomic sampling for both groups, Agavoideae (i.e., what used to be considered Agavaceae, as defined in Dahlgren et al., 1985, Rocha et al., 2006) and the Phyllostomidae, because it is well known that the proportion of taxa sampled has an effect not only on phylogenetic inference (Felsenstein, 1978, Poe, 1998), but also on estimates of molecular divergence and diversification rates in the focal clade (Sanderson and Doyle, 2001, Linder et al., 2005).

Amplification and sequencing

We obtained sequence data for 12% of the Mexican members of Agave sensu stricto, including members of all Mexican morphological groups of Littaea, and four (out of nine) morphological groups of Mexican members of the subgenus Agave. Regarding the herbaceous genera, 37% of the total species were included. All of the morphological groups of Manfreda, Polianthes and Prochnyanthes (a mono-generic clade) were represented, except for one Manfreda group (Verhoek, 1975). Thus, in total 17.5% of Mexican

Discussion

Our phylogenetic reconstruction and dating analysis with an extended sampling effort confirm a relatively recent 5–8 Ma monophyletic origin of Agave sensu lato, with a very high diversification rate. Manfreda, Polianthes and Prochnyanthes do not group together in a monophyletic clade nested within Agave, suggesting multiple origins of the herbaceous habit within the genus. Our estimate on the crown age of Glosophagini (18–22 Ma) and Choeronycterini (12–16 Ma), the most specialized tribes within

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by Proyecto Conacyt SEP-2004-C01-46475-Q and Proyecto Papiit IN224309-3. We thank the Posgrado en Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México and the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, México for granting scholarship 207136 to INFA, 262540 to LLSR and 16961 to RETS. The authors would like to thank Aldo Valera, Erika Aguirre, and Sandra Gómez for providing laboratory help during this study, Laura Espinosa-Asuar for laboratory help and sequencing

References (108)

  • H. Arita et al.

    The mammals of Mexico: distribution and conservation status

    Revista Mexicana de Mastozoología

    (1997)
  • H. Arita et al.

    Conservation biology of nectar-feeding bats in Mexico

    J. Mammal.

    (1999)
  • H.T. Arita et al.

    Revisión taxonómica de los murciélagos magueyeros del genero Leptonycteris (Chiroptera:Phyllostomidae)

    Acta Zool. Mexicana

    (1988)
  • S. Arizaga et al.

    Insurance against reproductive failure in a semelparous plant: bulbil formation in Agave macroacantha flowering stalks

    Oecologia

    (1995)
  • S. Arizaga

    Pollination ecology of Agave macroacantha (Agavaceae) in a mexican tropical desert. II The role of pollinators

    Am. J. Bot.

    (2000)
  • M. Arizmendi et al.

    Columnar Cacti and the diets of nectar-feeding bats

  • D.I. Axerold

    Age and origin of the Sonoran Desert

    Occas. Pap. Calif. Acad. Sci.

    (1979)
  • B. Baldwin et al.

    Age and rate of diversification of the Hawaiian silversword alliance

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.-Biol. U.S.A

    (1998)
  • R.J. Baker et al.

    Diversification among New World leaf-nosed bats: an evolutionary hypothesis and classification inferred from digenomic congruence of DNA sequence

    (2003)
  • R.J. Baker et al.

    Systematics of bats of the family Phyllostomidae based on RAG2 DNA sequences

    (2000)
  • R.J. Baker et al.

    Higher level classification of phyllostomid bats with a summary of DNA synapomorphies

    Chiropterologica

    (2016)
  • J. Bergstem

    A review of long-branch attraction

    Cladistics

    (2005)
  • D. Bogler et al.

    Phylogeny of Agavaceae based ndhF, rbcL and ITS sequences: implications of molecular data for classification

    Aliso

    (2006)
  • D.J. Bolger et al.

    Phylogeny of Agavaceae based on ITS rADN sequence variation

    Am. J. Bot.

    (1996)
  • K. Bremer

    Ancestral Areas: a cladistic reinterpretation of the center of origin concept

    Systemat. Biol.

    (1992)
  • R.F. Cole et al.

    Leptonycteris yerbabuenae

    Mammal. Species

    (2006)
  • N.J. Czaplewski et al.

    Additional bats from the middle Miocene LA Venta fauna of Colombia

    Rev. Acad. Colomb. Cienc.

    (2003)
  • T. Datzmann et al.

    Evolution of nectorivory in phyllostomids bats (Phyllostomidae Gray, 1825, Chiroptera: Mammalia)

    Evol. Biol.

    (2010)
  • J.J. Doyle et al.

    A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue

    Phytochem. Bull.

    (1987)
  • A.J. Drummond et al.

    Relaxed phylogenetics and dating with confidence

    PLoS Biol.

    (2006)
  • A.J. Drummond et al.

    BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees

    BMC Evol. Biol.

    (2007)
  • L.E. Eguiarte

    Hutchinson (Agavales) vs. Huber y Dahlgren: análisis moleculares sobre la filogenia y evolución de la familia Agavaceae sensu Hutchinson dentro de las monocotiledóneas

    B. Soc. Bot. Mex.

    (1995)
  • L.E. Eguiarte et al.

    Evolución de la Familia Agavaceae: filogenia, biología reproductiva y genética de poblaciones

    B. Soc. Bot. Mex.

    (2000)
  • L.E. Eguiarte et al.

    From isozymes to genomics: population genetics and conservation of Agave in Mexico

    Bot. Rev.

    (2013)
  • L.H. Emmons

    Neotropical Rainforest Mammals. A Field Guide

    (1997)
  • J. Felsenstein

    Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be posively misleading

    Syst. Zool.

    (1978)
  • T.H. Fleming et al.

    The evolution of bat pollination: a phylogenetic perspective

    Ann. Bot._London

    (2009)
  • I.N. Flores-Abreu

    Coevolución entre el género Agave sensu lato y sus murciélagos polinizadores (Phyllostomidae)

    (2007)
  • A. García-Mendoza

    Riqueza y endemismos de la familia Agavaceae en México

  • H.S. Gentry

    Agaves of Continental North America

    (1982)
  • E. Gimenez et al.

    Lingual morphology and cladistic analysisof the New World nectar-feeding bats (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae)

    J. Compar. Biol.

    (1996)
  • E.P. Gómez-Ruiz et al.

    Modelling the potential geographical distribution of an endangered pollination corridor in Mexico and the United States

    Divers. Distrib.

    (2017)
  • S. Good-Avila et al.

    Timing and rate of speciation in Agave (Agavaceae)

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.-Biol. U.S.A.

    (2006)
  • D. Gordon et al.

    Consed: a graphical tool for sequence finishing

    Genome Res.

    (1998)
  • Hall, T., 2005....
  • K.M. Halpin et al.

    A chloroplast phylogeny of Agavaceae subfamily Chlorogaloideae: implications for the tempo of evolution on serpentine soils

    Syst. Bot.

    (2013)
  • L. Hernández

    Análisis cladístico de la familia Agavaceae

    B. Soc. Bot. Mex.

    (1995)
  • T. Hernández-Hernández et al.

    Beyond aridification: multiple explanations for the elevated diversification of cacti in the New World Succulent Biome

    New Phytol.

    (2014)
  • F.G. Hoffmann et al.

    Molacular dating of the diversification of Phyllostominae bats based on nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequences

    Mol. Phylogenet. Evol.

    (2008)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text