Modeling lineage and phenotypic diversification in the New World monkey (Platyrrhini, Primates) radiation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2013.11.008Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We estimate a dated platyrrhine phylogenetic tree for ca. 80% extant species.

  • Extant lineage diversification shows a constant rate of accumulation.

  • In contrast, body size diversification shows a pattern of early niche partition followed by stasis.

  • Body size evolved according to the occupation of a multidimensional niche.

  • When oldest fossils are included, an early pulse of lineage origination appears.

Abstract

Adaptive radiations that have taken place in the distant past can now be more thoroughly studied with the availability of large molecular phylogenies and comparative data drawn from extant and fossil species. Platyrrhines are a good example of a major mammalian evolutionary radiation confined to a single continent, involving a relatively large temporal scale and documented by a relatively small but informative fossil record. Here, we present comparative evidence using data on extant and fossil species to explore alternative evolutionary models in an effort to better understand the process of platyrrhine lineage and phenotypic diversification. Specifically, we compare the likelihood of null models of lineage and phenotypic diversification versus various models of adaptive evolution. Moreover, we statistically explore the main ecological dimension behind the platyrrhine diversification. Contrary to the previous proposals, our study did not find evidence of a rapid lineage accumulation in the phylogenetic tree of extant platyrrhine species. However, the fossil-based diversity curve seems to show a slowdown in diversification rates toward present times. This also suggests an early high rate of extinction among lineages within crown Platyrrhini. Finally, our analyses support the hypothesis that the platyrrhine phenotypic diversification appears to be characterized by an early and profound differentiation in body size related to a multidimensional niche model, followed by little subsequent change (i.e., stasis).

Introduction

The study of lineage and phenotypic diversification in living clades with relatively recent divergences has supported models of adaptive radiation (Simpson, 1953, Schluter, 2000) that predict selective influences arising from ecological opportunity and circumstances (Gavrilets and Losos, 2009, Losos and Mahler, 2010). This process frequently results in great phenotypic variation and species richness relative to a short time frame of phylogenetic divergence (Schluter, 2000, Gavrilets and Losos, 2009, Losos and Mahler, 2010). It is also suspected that similar processes of adaptive radiation have driven the initial diversification of clades that originated in the distant past, for example, at the ordinal and subordinal levels in mammalian clades (Gavrilets and Losos, 2009, Losos and Mahler, 2010). In such cases, ecological opportunity may decrease during the radiation as niches are filled, leading to stasis.

Several evolutionary radiations have been carefully studied with recently developed mathematical models applied to molecular phylogenies and comparative data from extant species (Nee, 2006, Gavrilets and Losos, 2009, Losos and Mahler, 2010). However, it is becoming clear that our capacity to successfully model and understand the diversification processes of ancient clades is limited when only neontological data are considered (Quental and Marshall, 2010, Slater et al., 2012). New World monkeys (Parvorder Platyrrhini), one of the three major groups of living and fossil primates, are a good example of a major mammalian evolutionary radiation that occupies a large temporal scale (i.e., 20–40 million years ago or megannums [Ma] in Central and South America), exhibits a remarkable phenotypic variation (e.g., a body mass spanning two orders of magnitude, from 0.1 to more than 10 kg) and presents a relatively small but informative fossil record (Fleagle, 1999, Fleagle and Tejedor, 2002, r, 2008). Morphological and phylogenetic studies have hypothesized that the diversification of this monophyletic group was mainly linked to the action of deterministic-selective factors related to ecological variables (Rosenberger, 1992, Marroig and Cheverud, 2001, Rosenberger et al., 2009). However, there is no general agreement about the main ecological dimension—e.g., diet, locomotion or a multidimensional niche—behind the platyrrhine diversification (Rosenberger, 1992; Allen and Kay, 2012; Youlatos and Meldrum, 2011; Perez et al., 2011). It has also been suggested that the marked phenotypic diversification of platyrrhines occurred relatively quickly during the initial branching process of the main extant clades in connection with ecological niche opportunity (i.e., an early-burst platyrrhine radiation), followed by a slowdown in evolutionary rates which resulted in the widespread retention of the formative patterns that are characteristic of these lineages (i.e., evolutionary stasis; Rosenberger, 1992, Rosenberger et al., 2009, Perez et al., 2011).

Although some recent studies of evolutionary radiations have included information from the fossil record along with phylogenies and comparative data of extant species in a mathematical modeling framework (Slater et al., 2010, Slater et al., 2012, Etienne et al., 2011), such approach to the study of the dynamic processes of lineage origin and extinction, and phenotypic diversification, has not been applied to explore the platyrrhine evolutionary radiation. Here, we present comparative evidence using data on extant and fossil species to explore alternative evolutionary models in an effort to better understand the process of platyrrhine lineage and phenotypic diversification. Specifically, we compare the likelihood of null models of lineages and phenotypic diversification versus various models of adaptive evolution. Moreover, we explore the main ecological dimension behind the platyrrhine diversification. If the platyrrhine diversification conforms to the adaptive radiation theory, we expect that differentiation of the major extant platyrrhine lineages was concentrated relatively early in the history of the clade and that phenotypic variation—measured as body size—was partitioned among subclades early in their phylogenetic history as well, as a major driver or consequence of ecological niche partitioning and niche-filling. As a starting point, we first estimate a chronophylogenetic tree for most extant platyrrhine species using molecular data and Bayesian methods (Drummond et al., 2006). Then, using this tree and comparative statistical methods we explore the pattern of lineage diversification through time (Nee et al., 1992, Harmon et al., 2003, Ricklefs, 2007, Stadler, 2011a), investigate the pattern of body size diversification through time and the fit of a series of evolutionary models (Harmon et al., 2003, Butler and King, 2004). Finally, given that the inference of the tempo and mode of diversification of a clade using only extant species can be biased (Quental and Marshall, 2010, Slater et al., 2012), we compare the results based on extant species with the estimated body masses and number of lineages inferred from the platyrrhine fossil record. Summarizing, our work contributes to the discussion of platyrrhine evolution and diversification in three different ways: (1) we present one of the most complete molecular phylogenies of extant platyrrhine species to date, sampling published data on 108 taxa and estimating a chronophylogenetic tree for 78 putative “good” species; (2) we mathematically model the pattern of lineage and phenotypic diversification of the platyrrhine clade; and (3) we combine data about extant and fossil species in a novel way not employed before in studies of the platyrrhines to better understand the process of their diversification.

Section snippets

Molecular divergence among species and phylogenetic inference

Phylogenetic trees are used in almost every branch of evolutionary biology. In particular, in comparative analyses they are needed to avoid misinterpreting historical contingencies as causal relationships and to understand the patterns of diversification (Nee, 2006, Losos, 2011, Yang and Rannala, 2012). In our study, the phylogenetic tree itself is not of direct interest but it is a necessary first step for the following statistical comparative analyses. Previous phylogenetic studies have

Results

Our chronophylogenetic tree of platyrrhines is in general agreement with other recent relationship estimations (Fig. 1; Opazo et al., 2006, Wildman et al., 2009, Perelman et al., 2011, Perez et al., 2012), which support the division of platyrrhines into three monophyletic families (Atelidae, Cebidae and Pitheciidae) and suggest a sister-group phylogenetic relationship between Atelidae and Cebidae (Opazo et al., 2006, Wildman et al., 2009). We found Aotus to be phylogenetically related to

Discussion

The process of diversification of the platyrrhines has been investigated phylogenetically and morphologically (e.g., Rosenberger, 1992, Fleagle, 1999, Marroig and Cheverud, 2001, Hodgson et al., 2009, Wildman et al., 2009, Perez et al., 2011, Perez et al., 2012, Perez et al., 2013). Many of these studies have interpreted the diversification of extant New World monkeys as an adaptive radiation in which the major lineages diversified early and into various alternative ecological niches that

Conclusions

The temporal pattern of lineage accumulation and the mode of phenotypic evolution described here based on the extant platyrrhine species might seem contradictory since, as described above, one of the adaptive radiation scenarios predicts an early burst of species origination accompanied by a marked phenotypic diversification. Although both processes may be unlinked, when we also consider the fossil record information this contradiction diminishes as a pattern of an early burst of species

Acknowledgments

We are sincerely grateful to S.F. dos Reis, E. Delson and two anonymous reviewers for their comments on the manuscript. We thank Graham Slater for providing the scripts used to run OUaverage function in R software, and Luz Arias for helping us with the figures. This research is supported by Grants from the FONCyT (PICT-2011-0307).

References (81)

  • P.M. Barrett et al.

    Dinosaur diversity and the rock record

    Proc. R. Soc. B

    (2009)
  • M.J. Benton et al.

    Calibrating and constraining molecular clocks

  • K.P. Burnham et al.

    Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach

    (2002)
  • M.A. Butler et al.

    Phylogenetic comparative analysis: a modeling approach for adaptive evolution

    Am. Nat.

    (2004)
  • H.J. Chatterjee et al.

    Estimating the phylogeny and divergence times of primates using a supermatrix approach

    BMC Evol. Biol.

    (2009)
  • R.B.G. Clemente-Carvalho et al.

    Morphological and molecular variation in the Pumpkin Toadlet, Brachycephalus ephippium (Anura: Brachycephalidae)

    J. Herpetol.

    (2011)
  • N. Cusimano et al.

    A new method for handling missing species in diversification analysis applicable to randomly or nonrandomly sampled phylogenies

    Syst. Biol.

    (2012)
  • E. Delson et al.

    Are there any anthropoid primate “living fossils”?

  • E.P. Derryberry et al.

    Lineage diversification and morphological evolution in a large-scale continental radiation: the neotropical ovenbirds and woodcreepers (Aves: Furnariidae)

    Evolution

    (2011)
  • M. dos Reis et al.

    Phylogenomic datasets provide both precision and accuracy in estimating the timescale of placental mammal phylogeny

    Proc. R. Soc. B

    (2012)
  • A.J. Drummond et al.

    BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees

    BMC Evol. Biol.

    (2007)
  • A.J. Drummond et al.

    Relaxed phylogenetics and dating with confidence

    PLoS Biol.

    (2006)
  • R.S. Etienne et al.

    Diversity-dependence brings molecular phylogenies closer to agreement with the fossil record

    Proc. R. Soc. B

    (2011)
  • J. Felsenstein

    Phylogenies and the comparative method

    Am. Nat.

    (1985)
  • J.G. Fleagle

    Primate Adaptation and Evolution

    (1999)
  • J.G. Fleagle et al.

    Early platyrrhines of southern South America

  • M. Foote

    Origination and extinction components of taxonomic diversity: general problems

    Paleobiology

    (2000)
  • A. Fouquet et al.

    Underestimation of species richness in neotropical frogs revealed by mtDNA analyses

    PLoS One

    (2007)
  • S. Gavrilets et al.

    Adaptive radiation: contrasting theory with data

    Science

    (2009)
  • C.P. Groves

    Primate Taxonomy

    (2001)
  • C. Groves

    The what, why and how of primate taxonomy

    Int. J. Primatol.

    (2004)
  • T.F. Hansen

    Stabilizing selection and the comparative analysis of adaptation

    Evolution

    (1997)
  • Hall, T., 2004. BioEdit 7.0.0....
  • L.J. Harmon et al.

    Tempo and mode of evolutionary radiation in Iguanian lizards

    Science

    (2003)
  • L. Harmon et al.

    GEIGER: investigating evolutionary radiations

    Bioinformatics

    (2008)
  • P.H. Harvey et al.

    Phylogenies without fossils: estimating lineage birth and death rates

    Evolution

    (1994)
  • Hershkovitz, P., 1977. Living new world monkeys (Platyrrhini), vol. 1. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, p....
  • J.A. Hodgson et al.

    Successive radiations, not stasis, in the South American primate fauna

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.

    (2009)
  • C. Hoorn et al.

    Amazonia through time: Andean uplift, climate change, landscape evolution, and biodiversity

    Science

    (2010)
  • A.L. Jaffe et al.

    The evolution of island gigantism and body size variation in tortoises and turtles

    Biol. Lett.

    (2011)
  • Cited by (39)

    • Early evolutionary diversification of mandible morphology in the New World monkeys (Primate, Platyrrhini)

      2017, Journal of Human Evolution
      Citation Excerpt :

      Phylogenetic trees have direct or indirect interest for several branches of biology and anthropology (e.g., Lemey et al., 2009; Wiens, 2009; Yang and Rannala, 2012) and their estimation is a necessary first step for understanding the factors responsible for the ecological and phenotypic diversification of a clade (e.g., Felsenstein, 1985; Wiens, 2009; Losos, 2011). In this study, we based our phylogenetic analysis on the fossil-calibrated chronophylogenetic tree previously published in Aristide et al. (2015a), obtained using Bayesian methods on a concatenated dataset of 25,361 DNA bp, including coding and non-coding sequences and selecting six fossil calibrations. Geometric morphometric techniques were used to study variation in the mandibular morphology of extant and fossil platyrrhine species.

    • The evolution of the platyrrhine talus: A comparative analysis of the phenetic affinities of the Miocene platyrrhines with their modern relatives

      2017, Journal of Human Evolution
      Citation Excerpt :

      This is similar to the trend observed for body mass by Aristide et al. (2015), likely because both are scale measurements that are highly correlated. This relationship was likely associated with a differentiation among NWM families within an ecological adaptive landscape mostly defined by locomotion and diet (Rosenberger, 1992; Aristide et al., 2015). It has been previously proposed that size diversification in platyrrhines was mostly related to diet variation (Marroig and Cheverud, 2001; Perez et al., 2011), however the present results align with other findings that support a more complex scenario where platyrrhine evolution among the main lineages is linked to size changes related to a multidimensional niche (Rosenberger, 1980, 1992, Aristide et al., 2015, 2016).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text