Molecular phylogenetics of the neotropical butterfly subtribe Oleriina (Nymphalidae: Danainae: Ithomiini)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2010.01.010Get rights and content

Abstract

The Oleriina is one of the most speciose subtribes of the neotropical nymphalid butterfly tribe Ithomiini. They are widely distributed across the Andes and Amazonian lowlands and like other ithomiines they are involved in complex mimicry rings. This subtribe is of particular interest because it contains the most diverse ithomiine genus, Oleria, as well as two genera, Megoleria and Hyposcada, that feed on hostplants not utilized elsewhere in the tribe. Here we present the first comprehensive species-level phylogeny for the Oleriina, representing 83% of recognised species in the group, and based on 6698 bp from eight mitochondrial (mt) and nuclear (nc) genes. Topologies are largely congruent for ncDNA and the concatenated dataset and the genera Oleria, Hyposcada and Megoleria are recovered and well-supported, although strongly discordant genealogy between mtDNA and ncDNA suggest possible introgression among Hyposcada and Megoleria. A fourth clade containing the type species of Ollantaya is consistently recovered, and this recently synonymized name is resurrected. Clear subdivisions within Oleria separate the genus into four species groups, onega, amalda, makrena and aegle, which also correspond to differing biogeographic and elevation range characteristics.

Unlike other ithomiine genera, the Oleriina show homogeneity in mimetic wing pattern, in sharp contrast to the emerging paradigm that mimetic shifts have enhanced diversification in the tribe. Our results show a potentially more important role for geographic isolation in the diversification of the Oleriina compared to other Ithomiini studied to date and provide a framework for more detailed biogeographical studies, in addition to a rare opportunity for comparative analyses with other neotropical groups.

Introduction

The nymphalid butterfly tribe Ithomiini form a diverse and widespread neotropical group of approximately 370 species and over 1500 geographical races (Lamas, 2004, Willmott and Freitas, 2006). They are dominant members of complex mimicry rings that involve ithomiine, heliconiine, nymphaline and riodinid butterflies, notodontid day-flying moths and other insects (Beccaloni, 1997a). Adults of all Ithomiini use dehydropyrrolizidine alkaloids as defensive compounds, in the synthesis of pheromones to attract mates (Brown, 1987) and in the formation of aggregations of butterflies in ithomiine ‘pockets’ (Haber, 1978, Pinheiro et al., 2008). Most Ithomiini larvae feed on Solanaceae and the use of this family as a hostplant is seen as a key to the diversification of the butterfly group (Brown, 1987, Willmott and Freitas, 2006).

Knowledge of their systematics, biology and distribution is relatively advanced and the tribe has provided excellent models in studies on mimicry (Beccaloni, 1997a, Beccaloni, 1997b, Joron et al., 2001, Willmott and Mallet, 2004), biogeography (Elias et al., 2009), evolution (Whinnett et al., 2005a, Whinnett et al., 2005b, Jiggins et al., 2006, Elias et al., 2007, Elias et al., 2008) and chemical ecology (Brown, 1987, Schultz et al., 2004). However, species-level molecular phylogenies have yet to be elucidated and currently only two out of 50 genera (Mallarino et al., 2005, Elias et al., 2009) have been completed.

Ten Ithomiini subtribes (one unnamed) are currently recognised based on morphological characteristics (Lamas, 2004, Willmott and Freitas, 2006) and molecular data (Brower et al., 2006). The subtribe Oleriina contains 63 species and is of particular interest because one of its three constituent genera, Oleria, is the most speciose ithomiine genus (52 species) (Lamas, 2004). In contrast, the other two genera are relatively depauperate, with nine species of Hyposcada (Willmott and Lamas, unpublished data) and two species of Megoleria (Willmott and Lamas, 2008) currently recognised. The biogeography of this group is also of interest. Oleria and Hyposcada are both widely distributed, occurring from Mexico to Brazil at varying altitudes from sea level to 3000 m, with the former genus diverse in both lowland and montane habitats. Conversely, Megoleria is restricted to the high Andes of Colombia, Ecuador and Peru at altitudes ranging from 1200 to 2700 m.

Elucidating the systematics of the Ithomiini has proved particularly problematic because of their involvement in complex mimicry rings and geographical polymorphism. Additionally, association of the sexes in Oleria is sometimes complicated by sexual dimorphism in mimicry pattern (Willmott and Mallet, 2004).

Fox (1956) first proposed the subtribe Oleriina (then considered a tribe called Oleriini) including Hyposcada, Oleria, Aeria and an undescribed genus, but Harvey (1991) revised the constituent genera to include Hyposcada, Oleria and two new undescribed genera later named Ollantaya (Brown and Freitas, 1994) and Megoleria (Constantino, 1999). The genus Ollantaya was synonymized with the Oleria (Lamas, 2004), although recent morphological work suggests Ollantaya should be resurrected to include O. canilla, O. aegineta, H. olerioides and a fourth undescribed species from the Peruvian Andes (Willmott and Freitas, 2006).

Recent higher-level systematics of the Ithomiini using morphological characters confirmed Oleriina as monophyletic and sister to the Napeogenina and Ithomiina (Brown and Freitas, 1994, Willmott and Freitas, 2006). The monophyly of this group is corroborated from molecular data (Brower et al., 2006), based on 2335 bp of the mitochondrial (mtDNA) cytochrome oxidase subunits I and II (COI–COII) and the nuclear (ncDNA) genes, wingless and elongation factor 1-alpha (EF-1α). These data provide conflicting signal regarding the relationships of Megoleria to other oleriines, with morphological characters suggesting that Megoleria is sister to Hyposcada (Willmott and Freitas, 2006), while molecular data place Megoleria as sister to all other Oleriina (Brower et al., 2006). With the exception of Megoleria, there are few clear morphological synapomorphies supporting the remaining genera, and molecular data thus offer a promising solution to resolve relationships within this group.

The first molecular phylogenetic study of the Oleriina included 41 species (103 samples) based on 1619 bp of the mtDNA COI–COII and the ncDNA genes, wingless and EF-1α (Whinnett, 2005), and recovered the four genera, Oleria, Hyposcada, Megoleria and Ollantaya. Analyses using neighbour-joining (NJ) and maximum parsimony (MP) recovered Hyposcada as sister to all other Oleriina (Whinnett, 2005), whereas Bayesian inference (BI) of the concatenated data identified Megoleria as sister to all other Oleriina as in Brower et al. (2006).

Here we present one of the first comprehensive molecular phylogenetic analyses for any diverse butterfly tribe. Our sampling includes 52 of the 63 known Oleriina species, based on six gene regions comprising three mtDNA and five ncDNA genes for multiple individuals from the whole of the Oleriina subtribe. Our phylogenetic hypotheses allow revision of the generic classification of the tribe as a basis for generic revisions currently in preparation. In addition, this study forms part of a collaborative effort to generate species-level molecular phylogenetic hypotheses for the whole of the Ithomiini (Mallarino et al., 2005, Elias et al., 2009). As a result, we are also able to further assess the general importance of biogeographic processes identified as critical in the evolution of the few other tropical Andean butterfly genera studied to date (e.g., Willmott et al., 2001, Hall, 2005, Jiggins et al., 2006, Elias et al., 2009).

Section snippets

Taxon sampling

A total of 52 Oleriina species (Lamas, 2004, Willmott and Lamas, 2008), represented by 228 specimens were included in our phylogenetic analyses. This includes 43 of the 52 known species of Oleria, seven of nine species of Hyposcada and both species of Megoleria. At least three samples of each species were sequenced where available. In order to maximize geographical coverage of each species and to test species validity as many subspecies as possible were included: 87 of the 262 known Oleriina

Sequence data

The concatenated dataset consists of 6698 bp. Of 2291 bp from mtDNA, 929 sites were found to be variable of which 821 were parsimony informative. The combined ncDNA dataset of 4407 bp contained 2155 variable sites of which 1350 were parsimony informative. mtDNA showed strong A:T nucleotide bias (47.0:6.2:9.8:37.0% A:C:G:T) also found in other butterfly and Drosophila genomes (Wahlberg et al., 2003 and references therein). The ncDNA genes showed almost equal nucleotide base composition

Oleriina phylogeny and evolutionary history

Phylogenetic hypotheses for the Oleriina are largely concordant with morphology and previous molecular analyses with the exception of the relationships of Hyposcada and Megoleria. The former is recovered as sister to all other Oleriina confirming the findings of Whinnett (2005) but challenging those of Brower et al., 2006, Willmott and Freitas, 2006. Morphological analyses place Megoleria as sister to Hyposcada and these as sister to all other Oleriina (Brown and Freitas, 1994, Willmott and

Acknowledgments

We thank Gerardo Lamas, Andrew Brower, Mauro Costa, Luz Miryam Gomez Piñeres, Chris Jiggins, Mathieu Joron for donation of specimens, André Freitas for DNA sequences and Geoff Martin and Blanca Huertas for access to the NHM collections. Karina Lucas Silva-Brandão, Paul Upchurch and Ziheng Yang provided helpful discussions regarding statistical analyses. Fraser Simpson and Kanchon Dasmahapatra assisted in the lab and Fraser provided photographs for Fig. 2. K.W. acknowledges the support of the

References (54)

  • A.V.Z. Brower et al.

    Phylogenetic relationships among the Ithomiini (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) inferred from one mitochondrial and two nuclear gene regions

    Syst. Entomol.

    (2006)
  • K.S. Brown

    Chemistry at the solanaceae/ithomiinae interface

    Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.

    (1987)
  • K.S. Brown et al.

    Juvenile stages of Ithomiinae: overview and systematics (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)

    Trop. Lepid.

    (1994)
  • R.T. Brumfield et al.

    Evolution into and out of the Andes: a Bayesian analysis of historical diversification in Thamnophilus antshrikes

    Evolution

    (2007)
  • V. Bull et al.

    Polyphyly and gene flow between non-sibling Heliconius species

    BMC Biol.

    (2006)
  • L.M. Constantino

    Nuevas especies, subespecies y un nuevo género de ropalóceros del occidente de Colombia (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae, Nymphalidae, Charaxinae, Ithomiinae, Heliconiinae)

    Boletín Cientifico. Museo de Historia Natural. Universidad de Caldas

    (1999)
  • B.A. Drummond et al.

    Ithomiinae (Lepidotera: Nymphalidae): summary of known larval food plants

    Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.

    (1987)
  • M. Elias et al.

    Mutualistic interactions drive ecological niche convergence in a diverse butterfly community

    PLoS Biol.

    (2008)
  • M. Elias et al.

    Limited performance of DNA barcoding in a diverse community of tropical butterflies

    Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B

    (2007)
  • M. Elias et al.

    Out of the Andes: patterns of diversification in clearwing butterflies

    Mol. Ecol.

    (2009)
  • R.M. Fox

    A monograph of the Ithomiidae (Lepidoptera). Part I

    Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist.

    (1956)
  • Z. Gompert et al.

    Homoploid hybrid speciation in an extreme habitat

    Science

    (2006)
  • Haber, W.A., 1978. Evolutionary Ecology of Tropical Mimetic Butterflies (Lepidoptera: Ithomiinae). Ph.D. Thesis,...
  • J.P.W. Hall

    Montane speciation patterns in Ithomiola butterflies (Lepidotera: Riodinidae): are they consistently moving up in the world?

    Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B

    (2005)
  • T.A. Hall

    BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT

    Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser.

    (1999)
  • D.J. Harvey

    Higher classification of the Nymphalidae

  • J.P. Huelsenbeck et al.

    MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees

    Bioinformatics

    (2001)
  • Cited by (23)

    • Molecular comparison of the genus Junonia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in Myanmar

      2015, Journal of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity
      Citation Excerpt :

      The classification of closely related lepidopteran species based on morphological features alone presents several difficulties and the risk of inaccuracy because the function of certain attributes differs in different environments, leading to the prevalence of several biotypes (Linares et al 2009). Recent molecular marker techniques have facilitated the assessment of genetic diversity, improving the accuracy of genotyping, classification, inventorying, and molecular phylogenetic studies (Silva et al 2010). Mitochondrial and nuclear genes, such as elongation factor-1α gene and wingless gene, have been widely used for the molecular study of butterflies (Caterino et al 2000; Kandul et al 2004; Monteiro and Pierce 2001; Wahlberg et al 2003, 2005a; Zakharov et al 2004a).

    • Phylogeny, biogeography, and host-plant association in the subfamily Apaturinae (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) inferred from eight nuclear and seven mitochondrial genes

      2010, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
      Citation Excerpt :

      For distantly related taxa, such conflict is mainly due to the faster evolution of mitochondrial genes and their extremely biased base composition, which render them less suitable for recovering deeper divergence (Lin and Danforth, 2004; Winterton et al., 2007; Yoshizawa and Johnson, 2008). Recent studies have revealed that ancient hybridization also leads to the conflict in higher phylogeny (Wahlberg et al., 2009b; de-Silva et al., 2010). In the present phylogenetic analyses, although monophyly of Apatura and Doxocopa, and of Chitoria and Asterocampa was recovered only in the mitochondrial mt12 and mt18 datasets, other datasets containing nuclear sequences demonstrated largely similar phylogenetic results for the 12 ingroups.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text