Mechanisms of the cyclic nucleotide cross-talk signaling network in cardiac L-type calcium channel regulation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjmcc.2017.01.013Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Model analyzes L-type Calcium Channel (LCC) regulation by cyclic nucleotide (cN) cross-talk signaling network.

  • Model distinguishes LCC regulation mechanisms: cN cross-talk (Mechanism 1) versus interaction with PKA and PKG (Mechanism 2).

  • NO suppression of ICaL occurs via potentiation of gating mode with prolonged closed times.

  • Changes to ICaL are mitigated by cN cross-talk and redistribution of LCC gating modes.

  • Model provides insights into how cN signals are integrated via LCC regulation in the heart.

Abstract

Regulation of L-type Calcium (Ca2+) Channel (LCC) gating is critical to shaping the cardiac action potential (AP) and triggering the initiation of excitation-contraction (EC) coupling in cardiac myocytes. The cyclic nucleotide (cN) cross-talk signaling network, which encompasses the β-adrenergic and the Nitric Oxide (NO)/cGMP/Protein Kinase G (PKG) pathways and their interaction (cross-talk) through distinctively-regulated phosphodiesterase isoenzymes (PDEs), regulates LCC current via Protein Kinase A- (PKA) and PKG-mediated phosphorylation. Due to the tightly-coupled and intertwined biochemical reactions involved, it remains to be clarified how LCC gating is regulated by the signaling network from receptor to end target. In addition, the large number of EC coupling-related phosphorylation targets of PKA and PKG makes it difficult to quantify and isolate changes in L-type Ca2+ current (ICaL) responses regulated by the signaling network. We have developed a multi-scale, biophysically-detailed computational model of LCC regulation by the cN signaling network that is supported by experimental data. LCCs are modeled with functionally distinct PKA- and PKG-phosphorylation dependent gating modes. The model exhibits experimentally observed single channel characteristics, as well as whole-cell LCC currents upon activation of the cross-talk signaling network. Simulations show 1) redistribution of LCC gating modes explains changes in whole-cell current under various stimulation scenarios of the cN cross-talk network; 2) NO regulation occurs via potentiation of a gating mode characterized by prolonged closed times; and 3) due to compensatory actions of cross-talk and antagonizing functions of PKA- and PKG-mediated phosphorylation of LCCs, the effects of individual inhibitions of PDEs 2, 3, and 4 on ICaL are most pronounced at low levels of β-adrenergic stimulation. Simulations also delineate the contribution of the following two mechanisms to overall LCC regulation, which have otherwise been challenging to distinguish: 1) regulation of PKA and PKG activation via cN cross-talk (Mechanism 1); and 2) LCC interaction with activated PKA and PKG (Mechanism 2). These results provide insights into how cN signals transduced via the cN cross-talk signaling network are integrated via LCC regulation in the heart.

Introduction

The cardiac voltage-gated L-type calcium (Ca2+) channel (LCC) initiates and coordinates a series of events that give rise to the cardiac myocyte action potential (AP) and mechanical contraction and relaxation within each heartbeat [1], [2]. Activated upon membrane depolarization, LCCs allow Ca2+ influx across the sarcolemma [3] into nano-structures known as cardiac dyads, defined as regions where the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) membrane closely apposes (to within ~ 12 nm) the sarcolemma. Ca2+-binding Ca2+ release channels, known as ryanodine receptors (RyRs), are localized to the junctional SR (JSR) membrane of the dyad. LCC openings increase dyad Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2 +]) and Ca2+ binding to RyRs. Upon Ca2+ binding, RyRs open to release Ca2+ from the JSR Ca2 + store in a process known as Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release (CICR) [3], [4]. The elevated [Ca2+] promotes Ca2+ binding to myofilaments, initiating contraction [5], [6]. The process by which electrical excitation leads to mechanical contraction of the myocyte is referred to as the cardiac excitation-contraction (EC) coupling [3], [7].

Our previous work constructed a mechanistic model of the cyclic nucleotide (cN) cross-talk signaling network (Fig. 1A) [8], [9], composed of the β-adrenergic signaling pathway (red color scheme), the nitric oxide (NO)/cGMP/PKG signaling pathway (blue color scheme), and cross-talk between them (yellow color scheme) as facilitated by five distinct phosphodiesterases (PDEs) (orange boxes) [11], [12], [13]. Stimulation of the β-adrenergic and NO/cGMP/PKG pathways exert opposing physiological responses, with the former enhancing cardiac inotropy and lusitropy [3], [14] and the latter attenuating cardiac contractility [15], [16], [17], [18], [19] and antagonizing β-adrenergic tone [11], [12], [13], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27]. The importance of a delicate balance of cN signaling is reflected by isoform-specific alternations in PDEs in cardiac diseases [23], [26], [28], [29], [30]. As examples, PDE2 upregulation in the failing heart is observed to attenuate β-adrenergic signaling [26], decreased PDE3 activity promotes cardiac myocyte apoptosis [28], and PDE4 downregulation is associated with arrhythmias in cardiac hypertrophy and HF [29]. Drugs that target specific PDE activities have cardio-protective effects [31], such as restoration of PDE3 activity in ischemic and dilated cardiomyopathies [32], restoration of PDE1 and PDE4 activities in cardiac ischemia [33], and inhibition of PDE5 in heart failure, cardiac hypertrophy, and ventricular arrhythmias [34], [35], [36], [37].

The cN signaling cross-talk network (Fig. 1A) exerts both stimulatory (green arrow) and inhibitory (red arrow) regulation of LCCs (Fig. 1B). These actions are mediated by the dynamics of the two cyclic nucleotides (cNs), cyclic adenosine-3′, 5′-monophosphate (cAMP) and cyclic guanosine-3′, 5′-monophosphate (cGMP), as well as the subsequent activation of protein kinase A (PKA) and protein kinase G (PKG) [8], [9]. More specifically, PKA isoforms, PKA-I and PKA-II, and PKG isoform, PKG-I, are predominant in cardiac myocytes [8], [9]. As shown in Fig. 1B, the random openings and closings of LCCs result from an interplay between the processes of voltage-dependent activation (left model, horizontal transitions), Ca2+ dependent inactivation (CDI; left model, vertical transitions), and voltage-dependent inactivation (VDI; right model) [10]. In addition, Fig. 1B (left model) represents one of a number of possible LCC gating modes (Modei) depending upon PKA- and PKG-mediated phosphorylation of the channel, in response to the cN cross-talk signaling network [3], [35]. The values of transition rates, fmodei and gmodei (colored), depend on the gating mode (Modei). Explanation of gating mode transitions will follow in Methods below. In diseases such as cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure (HF) [30], [38], [39], [40], [41], the imbalances between β-adrenergic and NO/cGMP/PKG signaling and the resultant changes in L-type Ca2+ current (ICaL) lead to alterations in EC coupling [42], AP duration (APD) [42], and increased likelihood of after-depolarizations [43]. Despite its physiological significance, mechanisms of LCC regulation by the cN cross-talk signaling network are not yet understood quantitatively.

The large number and inter-dependence of EC coupling-related PKA and PKG phosphorylation targets [3], [4], [35], as well as the large number of interacting proteins within the cN cross-talk signaling network itself, make understanding of the ways in which this network regulates ICaL challenging [8], [9]. Multiple mechanisms may underlie observed changes in ICaL upon activation of the signaling network. Prior studies have modeled the impact of β-adrenergic regulation or PKA activation on LCC gating [44], [45], [46], [47], [48], [49]; however, the integration of NO/cGMP/PKG and its cross-talk with the β-adrenergic pathway on LCC gating regulation remains to be carefully studied. In addition, the mechanisms underlying LCC regulation remain elusive, in part because it has been challenging to distinguish the impact on LCC gating from PKA and PKG activation via competitive and compensatory interactions between the cNs and PDEs within the signaling network (Mechanism 1) and from LCC interaction with activated PKA and PKG (Mechanism 2). To address this challenge, we have constructed an integrative mathematical model of the dynamic regulation of stochastic LCC gating as a function of β-adrenergic and NO stimulation (Fig. 1). Three predictions emerge from this model. First, changes in ICaL under varying extents of stimulation of the cN cross-talk network can be explained by redistribution of LCCs among four distinct gating modes. Second, NO suppression of ICaL occurs via potentiation of an LCC gating mode characterized by prolonged closed times [44], [50]. Third, individual inhibitions of PDEs 2, 3, and 4 produce no changes in ICaL under basal conditions. Instead, ICaL changes are observed in the presence of β-adrenergic stimulation, with effects being more pronounced at lower, rather than higher levels, of β-adrenergic stimulation.

Section snippets

Methods

The integrated model described in this work (Fig. 1) is referred to as the cN signaling-LCC model and consists of three modules: 1) the cN cross-talk signaling network model; 2) the PKA-PKG-LCC model; and 3) the LCC gating model. To develop this model, we have integrated the previously developed cN cross-talk signaling network model from Zhao et al. [8] with the LCC model of Greenstein and Winslow [10], originally developed by Jafri et al. [51], through PKA- and PKG- mediated regulation of the

Model validation of single channel behavior

Model predictions of LCC availability and gating mode distributions in response to the β-adrenergic agonist, isoproterenol (ISO), and the NO donor, S-nitroso-N-acetyl-d, l-penicillamine (SNAP), reproduce results from single channel recordings (Fig. 3). Four stimulation scenarios were investigated: “Basal” representing non-stimulated condition, and “ISO”, “SNAP”, and “ISO + SNAP” representing maximal stimulation by the indicated reagent. As shown in Fig. 3A, the fraction of LCCs available under

Integrative modeling dissects mechanisms underlying LCC regulation by cN cross-talk signaling network

The cN cross-talk signaling network (Fig. 1A) exerts both stimulatory and inhibitory regulations of LCCs (Fig. 1B), which is essential for the initiation and coordination of cardiac electrical and mechanical properties, such as CICR, AP, and EC coupling [1], [2]. On the other hand, the nature of LCC regulation by the cN cross-talk signaling network is poorly understood, in part because it has been challenging to decipher the functional roles of the numerous mechanisms contributing to ICaL

Conclusion

We developed a computational model of LCC regulation by the cN cross-talk signaling network (Fig. 1) that functionally integrates signaling and LCC gating to investigate the effect of cN cross-talk on ICaL (Fig. 2). Using the model, we deciphered the underlying mechanisms of three model observations: 1) changes in whole-cell ICaL can be explained by redistribution of LCC gating modes caused by the cN cross-talk network (Fig. 3, Fig. 4, Fig. 5); 2) NO regulation of ICaL occurs via potentiation

Disclosures

None declared.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada scholarships, CGS M-377616-2009 and PGSD3-405041-2011, awarded to C.Y.Z, and National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) of the USA grant R01 HL105239.

A portion of the research contained in this manuscript has been presented as a Platform Presentation in Calcium Signaling at the 60th Annual Meeting of the Biophysical Society in March 2016.

References (138)

  • H. Mehel et al.

    Phosphodiesterase-2 is up-regulated in human failing hearts and blunts β-adrenergic responses in cardiomyocytes

    J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.

    (2013)
  • S.E. Lehnart et al.

    Phosphodiesterase 4D deficiency in the ryanodine-receptor complex promotes heart failure and arrhythmias

    Cell

    (2005)
  • M. Kostic et al.

    Altered expression of PDE1 and PDE4 cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase isoforms in 7-oxo-prostacyclin-preconditioned rat heart

    J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol.

    (1997)
  • J.-P. Benitah et al.

    L-type Ca2 + current in ventricular cardiomyocytes

    J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol.

    (2010)
  • A.J. Tanskanen et al.

    The role of stochastic and modal gating of cardiac L-type Ca2 + channels on early after-depolarizations

    Biophys. J.

    (2005)
  • A.J. Tanskanen et al.

    The role of stochastic and modal gating of cardiac L-type Ca2 + channels on early after-depolarizations

    Biophys. J.

    (2005)
  • J.J. Saucerman et al.

    Modeling β-adrenergic control of cardiac myocyte contractility in silico

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2003)
  • A.R. Soltis et al.

    Synergy between CaMKII substrates and β-adrenergic signaling in regulation of cardiac myocyte Ca2 + handling

    Biophys. J.

    (2010)
  • J.H. Yang et al.

    Phospholemman is a negative feed-forward regulator of Ca2 + in β-adrenergic signaling, accelerating β-adrenergic inotropy

    J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol.

    (2012)
  • J.H. Yang et al.

    PKA catalytic subunit compartmentation regulates contractile and hypertrophic responses to β-adrenergic signaling

    J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol.

    (2014)
  • M.S. Jafri et al.

    Cardiac Ca2 + dynamics: the roles of ryanodine receptor adaptation and sarcoplasmic reticulum load

    Biophys. J.

    (1998)
  • R.D. Harvey et al.

    CaV1.2 signaling complexes in the heart

    J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol.

    (2013)
  • L. Jiang et al.

    Regulation of cloned cardiac L-type calcium channels by cGMP-dependent protein kinase

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2000)
  • C. Grassi et al.

    Modulation of Ca v 1 and Ca v 2.2 channels induced by nitric oxide via cGMP-dependent protein kinase

    Neurochem. Int.

    (2004)
  • Y.L. Hashambhoy et al.

    CaMKII-induced shift in modal gating explains L-type Ca2 + current facilitation: a modeling study

    Biophys. J.

    (2009)
  • Y.L. Hashambhoy et al.

    Role of CaMKII in RyR leak, EC coupling and action potential duration: a computational model

    J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol.

    (2010)
  • D.M. Bers et al.

    Chapter 1 - a practical guide to the preparation of Ca2 + buffers

  • Y. Katsube et al.

    Differences in isoproterenol stimulation of Ca2 + current of rat ventricular myocytes in neonatal compared to adult

    Eur. J. Pharmacol.

    (1996)
  • J.M. Best et al.

    Different subcellular populations of L-type Ca2 + channels exhibit unique regulation and functional roles in cardiomyocytes

    J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol.

    (2012)
  • M.T. Ziolo et al.

    Myocytes isolated from rejecting transplanted rat hearts exhibit a nitric oxide-mediated reduction in the calcium current

    J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol.

    (2001)
  • H. Wang et al.

    Phosphodiesterase 5 restricts NOS3/soluble guanylate cyclase signaling to L-type Ca2 + current in cardiac myocytes

    J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol.

    (2009)
  • J.M. Hare

    Nitric oxide and excitation–contraction coupling

    J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol.

    (2003)
  • R. Rastaldo et al.

    Nitric oxide and cardiac function

    Life Sci.

    (2007)
  • D.D. Thomas et al.

    The chemical biology of nitric oxide: implications in cellular signaling

    Free Radic. Biol. Med.

    (2008)
  • M.D. Stern et al.

    Local control models of cardiac excitation–contraction coupling. A possible role for allosteric interactions between ryanodine receptors

    J. Gen. Physiol.

    (1999)
  • D.M. Bers

    Cardiac excitation–contraction coupling

    Nature

    (2002)
  • R.L. Winslow et al.

    Integrative modeling of the cardiac ventricular myocyte

    Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Syst. Biol. Med.

    (2011)
  • J.J. Rice et al.

    Comparison of putative cooperative mechanisms in cardiac muscle: length dependence and dynamic responses

    Am. J. Phys. Heart Circ. Phys.

    (1999)
  • M. Zaccolo et al.

    cAMP and cGMP signaling cross-talk role of phosphodiesterases and implications for cardiac pathophysiology

    Circ. Res.

    (2007)
  • A. Stangherlin et al.

    cGMP-cAMP interplay in cardiac myocytes: a local affair with far-reaching consequences for heart function

    Biochem. Soc. Trans.

    (2012)
  • A. Stangherlin et al.

    cGMP signals modulate cAMP levels in a compartment-specific manner to regulate catecholamine-dependent signaling in cardiac myocytesnovelty and significance

    Circ. Res.

    (2011)
  • A. Katz

    Physiology of the heart

  • G. Boerrigter et al.

    Modulation of cGMP in Heart Failure: A new Therapeutic Paradigm, cGMP: Generators, Effectors and Therapeutic Implications

    (2009)
  • L.L.K. Antos et al.

    cGMP: Generators, Effectors and Therapeutic Implications

    (2009)
  • E. Takimoto et al.

    cGMP catabolism by phosphodiesterase 5A regulates cardiac adrenergic stimulation by NOS3-dependent mechanism

    Circ. Res.

    (2005)
  • H. Senzaki et al.

    Cardiac phosphodiesterase 5 (cGMP-specific) modulates β-adrenergic signaling in vivo and is down-regulated in heart failure

    FASEB J.

    (2001)
  • M. Mongillo et al.

    Compartmentalized phosphodiesterase-2 activity blunts β-adrenergic cardiac inotropy via an NO/cGMP-dependent pathway

    Circ. Res.

    (2006)
  • A. Abi-Gerges et al.

    Decreased expression and activity of cAMP phosphodiesterases in cardiac hypertrophy and its impact on β-adrenergic cAMP signals

    Circ. Res.

    (2009)
  • H.R. Weiss et al.

    Cyclic GMP and cyclic AMP induced changes in control and hypertrophic cardiac myocyte function interact through cyclic GMP affected cyclic-AMP phosphodiesterases

    Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol.

    (1999)
  • H.C. Champion et al.

    Role of nitric oxide in the pathophysiology of heart failure

  • 1

    Current position: Scientist, Acute Care Solutions, Philips Research North America, 2 Canal Park, 3rd floor, Cambridge, MA 02141, USA.

    View full text